Max's monza press conference

  • Thread starter pSI civic
  • 5 comments
  • 464 views

pSI civic

(Banned)
1,135
http://www.formula1.com/race/news/3529/746.html

long read but some interesting things i though.

first off, with the max amount of downforce being measured by putting weight on the car and seeing when the plank touchs wouldnt the suspension set up (i.e spring rates and ride height.) make a difference to when the plank would touch?

they also say that they wouldnt regulate the downforce by deminsions so does that mean the teams can chose the max heigh of the front wing and where the rear wing is or will they still keep max deminsions similer to now but losen them up a bit?

on the engines, they are talking about not having a v10 as a second engine choice for the smaller teams but a rev limited v8. does that mean there will be two v8's or will all be rev limited?

i dont like the idea they have proposed of rev limiting all engines to, say, 18,000rpm. i like the idea of with growing technology ataining higher revs. it has been said that in the next year 22,000rpm would be in reach. i like the sound of that.

they are also talking about hybrid technology being used in f1. by the brakes gathering force when used like is used in the toyota prius. is the extra weight worth an extra 50-60 hp?

also, would this be a full time system to be used when the car gets on a straight or would this be like the cart series' push to pass?

they are saying there may be an increas to the size of wheels and tires. is that really needed? if so how much are we talking? i dont like the idea of an F1 car sitting on dubs... but bigger wheels would allow for bigger brakes which would be good.

with the active tire presures, does that mean they would be able to adjust them during the race or just maintain them so avoid a flat or such?

i like the fact that teams will soon be able to sell their old cars to new teams. we finaly could see more then 10 teams. that combined with the elimination of the large 48 million entry bond should provide us with a few more teams which will make me happy.

now to the ecu's. i like the idea of each team making its own, but i dont like the idea of having traction control. the fia saying they would have to give up on policing it seems rather lazy to me.
 
is the extra weight worth an extra 50-60 hp?
There would be no extra weight, ballast would simply be removed to lighten the car back down to around the minimum weight limit.

Blake
 
There would be no point, because every car will still be the same weight irrespective of whether they used this sort of device or not. Anyway I'd say that the use of such devices should be encouraged, because if teams pump millions into developing these systems they will be much more efficient than if it was left to car companies to do it on their own accord.

Blake
 
what about that aero/suspension thing? i dont see how putting weight on a car will test its max aero. the stiffness of the suspension and the mount points would affect it wouldnt it?
 
they couldnt use generic figures because all the cars are different. they would have to have all the cars specs and data and they would have to specialize all their equipment to each car. that would cost money and time.

i like the idea of having a max number and just letting the teams do what they want to get there though. get away from the cookie cutter car. the last thing we need is F1 being anything like nascar.
 
Back