06 Viper details anyone???

  • Thread starter fergamasco
  • 86 comments
  • 3,679 views
Does anyone have any updates on the 06 viper srt coupe,im dieing to know more details!!! :banghead: :odd: :drool:



Holy crap,screw that,was looking on the hennesy performance website and saw this

Pic2.php



2006 Venom 1000 Twin Turbo SRT Coupe
The fastest and most powerful limited-edition street car in the world. Only 24 will be built for the 2006 production year. Now taking orders for 2006 production. Dealer inqueries welcome.

Power:
1000 hp @ 5000 rpm
1100 lb-ft torque @ 3800 rpm

Performance:
0-60 mph: 2.9 sec.
0-100 mph: 5.9 sec.
0-150 mph: 10.9 sec.
0-200 mph: 19.9 sec.
Top Speed: 255 mph
 
They're guesstimates, even if it could do that it would never lap a track as fast as an Enzo or similar car unless it was a track that allowed for an average speed of over 220Mph. I noticed they put the 0-100 at 5.9, because 6 seconds it currently a holy grail for production cars to hit 100 in, tbh I find it funny that they chose 5.9 for that, it'll probably do it in the mid-low 6's. None of the cars have been built or are near completion just yet.
 
1000hp and 1100lb ft. Hmmm sounds like severe traction problems to me. Unless its going to have massive drag slicks in the back of course.
 
Speaking of shafted... once again the Vipers are embarassed at the Road America ALMS. :rolleyes: :banghead: damn it Dodge! Do something you ****ers! Stupid ass Merc. :grumpy:
 
live4speed
They're guesstimates, even if it could do that it would never lap a track as fast as an Enzo or similar car unless it was a track that allowed for an average speed of over 220Mph. I noticed they put the 0-100 at 5.9, because 6 seconds it currently a holy grail for production cars to hit 100 in, tbh I find it funny that they chose 5.9 for that, it'll probably do it in the mid-low 6's. None of the cars have been built or are near completion just yet.
Not sure if you just mean the coupe hasn't been built, but the Venom 1000 is in the current issue of R&T this month. They have a standing mile drag race, along with other things, with the Venom 1000, the S7-TT, an F18, and a CHAMP car, and some other speed machines. The Venom ran the 0-mile in 25.6sec at 210.2mph, second in the test behind the CHAMP car, and beating every other thing there, including a Daytona Prototype racer and MV Agusta sport bike. And, while its actual acceleration times are slightly off from the estimates listed here, they are damn close, and staggeringly fast at that. Seems to me, they have all the power and speed they say the cars makes.

Article
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article.asp?section_id=7&article_id=2572&page_number=1
Article Data Page (pdf)
http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/download/0509_mile_spread_carts.pdf
Speeds and Acceleration (pdf)
http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/download/0509_mile_speedometer.pdf

Hilg
 
I think the venom your talking about is the old gts version,With 1000hp+ and a top spd of 250+ i think that this new venom would easily reach those standerds.
 
I doubt it would accelerate as fast as the guesstimates given, sure it will be insanely fast in a straight line. It will not go round your average track as quick as an Enzo, MC12 or Speed 12, they are based on carbon tub chassis and setups like top class GT racers, the Viper is not.
 
live4speed
I doubt it would accelerate as fast as the guesstimates given, sure it will be insanely fast in a straight line. It will not go round your average track as quick as an Enzo, MC12 or Speed 12, they are based on carbon tub chassis and setups like top class GT racers, the Viper is not.
While I don't doubt that those cars are very fast around a track, I think a lot of people underestimate how good the Viper is around a track. We're talking about a very low car, that weighs just 3,300lbs, has over 500hp, and has 275 and 345 section width tires under it. While it obviously won't be as fast as a C-GT or Enzo, which both weigh less and have more power, this car has huge potential in the right hands.

R&T have tested it to 1.04g in the skidpad, and almost 69mph in the slalom. Thats actually better than the Enzo in the skidpad, and only marginally slower through the slalom. Braking numbers are only slightly better for the Enzo as well, now that the Viper has ABS. Yes, these are only static measurements, and not actual lap times or real world numbers. They do show the potential the cars have.

And, I don't want to take anything away from the Enzo, its a hell of a work of art. But I have to think that a base car like the Viper that can handle and brake that well, will easilly keep up with, or leave in the dust, an Enzo when the Ferrari has 400hp less than the Venom??? We're talking about 1000hp here. We've all played with cars like that in GT. Might handle like total ass, but if its got the power, you can make things happen. And, the Viper already handles very well just because of the sheer mechanical grip it has. Put 1000hp in one, and it will leave a lot of things in its rear-view.

Hilg
 
Skid pad tests and numbers of g's pulled in a skid pad test are not definitive, they test a car driven at a certain speed round a certain corner or circle. I've seen it a few times where the car has broken loose and they've kept that speed but the back end's come out, same for slalom speeds. It doesn't count if the cars lost grip and slides yet some magazines will still use thoes results a R&T is one of them. I've seen the SRT-10 round a track more than once, it's an underachiever. Round the TopGEar track it ran 1'28.5, it was half a second slower than the M3 CSL, 1 second slower than a T350C, nearly 2 seconds slower than the C6 corvette cabriolet and a whole 4 seconds slower than a Sagaris. Every single one of thoes cars hass less power, they all beat the Viper. Don't tell me that they're super track cars when I haven't seen or read about a single good lap time from one, ever, that includes the Ring, TopGear's track and Hockenheim. Theres no way on earth any Viper with any ammount of power will go round corners faster than an Enzo, the Enzo is wider, lower, stiffer and better aerodynamically, it's carrying speed through corners that counts on a track.

It's funny how people are happy to dissmiss one 1000Bhp car ie the Veyron, and praise another. The bottom line is we won't know until we see lap times, but the SRT-10 is not a great track performer.
 
JNasty4G63
While I don't doubt that those cars are very fast around a track, I think a lot of people underestimate how good the Viper is around a track. We're talking about a very low car, that weighs just 3,300lbs, has over 500hp, and has 275 and 345 section width tires under it. While it obviously won't be as fast as a C-GT or Enzo, which both weigh less and have more power, this car has huge potential in the right hands.

R&T have tested it to 1.04g in the skidpad, and almost 69mph in the slalom. Thats actually better than the Enzo in the skidpad, and only marginally slower through the slalom. Braking numbers are only slightly better for the Enzo as well, now that the Viper has ABS. Yes, these are only static measurements, and not actual lap times or real world numbers. They do show the potential the cars have.

And, I don't want to take anything away from the Enzo, its a hell of a work of art. But I have to think that a base car like the Viper that can handle and brake that well, will easilly keep up with, or leave in the dust, an Enzo when the Ferrari has 400hp less than the Venom??? We're talking about 1000hp here. We've all played with cars like that in GT. Might handle like total ass, but if its got the power, you can make things happen. And, the Viper already handles very well just because of the sheer mechanical grip it has. Put 1000hp in one, and it will leave a lot of things in its rear-view.

Hilg

5th Gear (on british TV) tested the SRT-10 around Anglesey track last year with BTCC Touring Car driver Jason Plato and ex F1 & LeMans racer Tiff Needell- they said it was ****e as a track car. Loads of power, but absolutley rubbish at getting the power down. How does the saying go? - power is nothing without control.

Like Live4Speed mentioned, on the TopGear test track it lapped 9.5 seconds slower than the Enzo and 10 seconds slower than the MC12 Masser.
 
live4speed
Skid pad tests and numbers of g's pulled in a skid pad test are not definitive, they test a car driven at a certain speed round a certain corner or circle. I've seen it a few times where the car has broken loose and they've kept that speed but the back end's come out, same for slalom speeds. It doesn't count if the cars lost grip and slides yet some magazines will still use thoes results a R&T is one of them.
The way they test them, is by doing a lap around a set-diameter circle, and timing it. If a car gets around the circle in a faster time, it has a better skidpad number. And, even if the rear breaks loose, if they can hold it through the full lap, all the better. Faster around the pad is faster. Same goes for the slalom. Set a distance, time it, and get your speed.

And, as I said, yes, these are only static numbers and measurements. But, they give you a very good base point and idea of what a car is capable of. At no point in either of my previous posts did I say the Viper was the greatest road car ever. Just simply that it has huge potential and can be very, VERY fast around a track. I've raced against a couple on multiple occasions here in auto-x races, and at some open track days. They are not to be underestimated.

Just because a couple of British TV shows bag on the car, that doesn't mean anything to me. Nothing against those shows, but I've yet to ever see an episode where the non-British car won anything. 5th and TG are fun to watch, but come on. Have you ever seen either of those shows say they like anything American???? What did you think they'd say about it???

And, the lap times at the TG track are all well and good being that its same track and same driver. But,without testing same cars on same days in same conditions, direct comparison is kind of moot. Yes, it shows potential of a car. But, as everyone knows, unless its direct and equal competition, the numbers are just good for show. Didn't we all learn anything in the "Z06 'Ring" thread???

Again, I'm not trying to knock the Enzo here. But, just because a couple of, albeit funny and entertaining, British TV shows say the American car sucks around the track, that means little to me. I've seen first hand what Vipers can do, and its nothing to be sorry for. Like I said, its not the greatest car ever, far from it. But, the car is a very potent machine. Look past the TV and you'll see this.

If you want a good look at what they are capable of, check out the "One Lap of America" sometime. Its a big race here in the states every year where teams drive their car from track to track for a week and a half or so. Then, at each track, they compete for fast laps. So, not only do you need to have a fast car. But, it has to be reliable enough to last the whole time at the track, AND to be driven the entire time to all the events. From 2000-2002, a Viper won the whole competition, and since then, there has been a Viper in the top 3 every year. This is a great show of what the cars can do. With a top notch driver, under heavy competition, they perform very well.

Stock for stock, sure an Enzo will dominate a Viper all day. But, I've seen Vipers with upwards of 700hp at the track. And, regardless of how well you think they handle, they are absolute monsters. Give it 1000hp, and I don't know many cars that could keep up.

Hilg
 
Fisrt off, the whole idea of testing how well a car handles is to see how well it gets round a corner, going around it sideways is not good cornering, yet it can be missleading if you look at the g's produced since you can get more g's going a corner sideways as you do cornering flat.

Secondly, who mentioned a couple of British TV shows, I'm talking every lap time set, magazines, TV ect, they all show the SRT-10 getting beat by lesser cars. TopGear demonstrated this, however, it's worth noting Jerremy Clarkson like the SRT-10 a lot before you start blabbing on about how much he slates them when your just guessing.

The Viper was tested in good dry conditions on the TopGear track, it doesn't matter if the otthers that beat it were or wern't, exept for the fact that if they wern't then the in performance difference is even bigger, and doesnt the same apply to almost every test done so the point is kind of mute.

Just as you've seen first hand what a Viper can do, I've seen first hand what one can't do. More than once, there used to be a guy that lived near me that owned one, take the C6 Vette for examplem 100Bhp less, much better round a track, produces faster times all the time. The T350C, 150Bhp down, faster times in all tests, the Sagaris, too new to have been tested in enough places but where it has been, far superior times, 100Bhp down.

Give a Viper 1000Bhp and just try to use that power round a corner when a stock one with 500 horses can't do it. I'm not saying th Vipers a crap car, but it's not a great track car, for it's power and purpose it's an underachiever compared to TVR's, Corvette's and others. It's a nice car and it's cool to like them but don't start raving about a 1000Bhp Viper turning the Enzo on it's ass because thats just not happening.

If you want stock for stock performance a 350Bhp T350 will humiliate the SRT-10 all day.
 
live4speed
Fisrt off, the whole idea of testing how well a car handles is to see how well it gets round a corner, going around it sideways is not good cornering, yet it can be missleading if you look at the g's produced since you can get more g's going a corner sideways as you do cornering flat.
You're missing the point there. If the test is getting around a circular lap faster, and a car can do it, thats good. Just because the back end might be out, that means nothing about good or bad handling. You'd be surprised at how many auto-x cars are setup for oversteer. To you, that might be "bad handling" because the back end gets out. But, it gets around the track faster. If you can control it, it will be faster.
live4speed
Secondly, who mentioned a couple of British TV shows,
You did.
live4speed
I'm talking every lap time set, magazines, TV ect, they all show the SRT-10 getting beat by lesser cars.
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article.asp?section_id=31&article_id=1949&page_number=13
There you go. In 5 seconds of searching, I found that. Driven by Steve Millen, the Viper was only beaten by the Vette, and only by 0.3sec. Easilly beating those "lesser" cars that you think should beat it. If you have some other links you'd like to share, fire away.
live4speed
it's worth noting Jerremy Clarkson like the SRT-10 a lot before you start blabbing on about how much he slates them when your just guessing.
Show me any example of an American car that they like on that show. I'd love to see it. I've watched every episode thats available to me here from the internet, and have yet to see anything but mockery and laughter at the American cars from them. Its a funny show. But, they aren't the ones I'm looking to if I want info on a car.
live4speed
...so the point is kind of mute.
MOOT, the word is MOOT.
live4speed
Just as you've seen first hand what a Viper can do, I've seen first hand what one can't do.
Well, no offense, but I think I can attest for the capability better than you can. I basically live in Viper Country. Just north of Omaha here, is Woodhouse Chrysler. They are the biggest Viper dealer in the world. Bob Woodhouse, the owner, has been racing them for as long as they've been around. Given how often I see them at the track, and around town, I feel I'm a little more qualified to talk about capabilities. Hell, I've been to open track days here when there has been close to 100 Vipers there. Is there even 100 Vipers in all of GB???
live4speed
I'm not saying th Vipers a crap car, but it's not a great track car, for it's power and purpose it's an underachiever compared to TVR's, Corvette's and others.
Again, you must not be seeing very good Vipers if you think they aren't good around a track. Hell, I've seen a stock old-gen Viper ACR run the table at an auto-x before. Thats bone stock, and it beat every car, in every class. They are very capable cars.
live4speed
It's a nice car and it's cool to like them but don't start raving about a 1000Bhp Viper turning the Enzo on it's ass because thats just not happening.
I don't really like them. I'm just trying to help dispell the myth that they are somehow BAD track cars. And, I also never said a Venom 1000 would "turn an Enzo on it's ass" did I??? No. I simply said that given how well I know Vipers can handle stock, a well setup one with 1000hp could be very, VERY fast at the track.
live4speed
If you want stock for stock performance a 350Bhp T350 will humiliate the SRT-10 all day.
Well, I would hope so. The car weighs 1000lbs less. You know what??? A Yamaha R1 will beat a T350. Oh, wait. Its got 180hp and only weighs 350lbs, it should.

Hilg
 
JNasty4G63
You're missing the point there. If the test is getting around a circular lap faster, and a car can do it, thats good. Just because the back end might be out, that means nothing about good or bad handling. You'd be surprised at how many auto-x cars are setup for oversteer. To you, that might be "bad handling" because the back end gets out. But, it gets around the track faster. If you can control it, it will be faster.
Grip is faster in a race scenario, race drivers don't drift. Auto X may be different due to the way the tracks are laid out, tighter ect I don't know, but on a race track if the back end goes out you've made a mistake.

JNasty4G63
I didn't, I mentioned the TopGear test track, thats not a TV show thats a track, even if you take it as a show thats still only TopGear and not a couple of shows.

JNasty4G63
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article.asp?section_id=31&article_id=1949&page_number=13
There you go. In 5 seconds of searching, I found that. Driven by Steve Millen, the Viper was only beaten by the Vette, and only by 0.3sec. Easilly beating those "lesser" cars that you think should beat it. If you have some other links you'd like to share, fire away.
Road and track are biased, I have links to times for the TopGears track times, round the Ring it managed a "superb" 8'13, thats slower than the two ton V8 Vantage.

JNasty4G63
Show me any example of an American car that they like on that show. I'd love to see it. I've watched every episode thats available to me here from the internet, and have yet to see anything but mockery and laughter at the American cars from them. Its a funny show. But, they aren't the ones I'm looking to if I want info on a car.
The C6 Corvette, sure they had a joke about it being American but they still liked it, Jerremy even said people should consider buying one in one of his articles.

JNasty4G63
MOOT, the word is MOOT.
Very nice, the point still stands.

JNasty4G63
Well, no offense, but I think I can attest for the capability better than you can. I basically live in Viper Country. Just north of Omaha here, is Woodhouse Chrysler. They are the biggest Viper dealer in the world. Bob Woodhouse, the owner, has been racing them for as long as they've been around. Given how often I see them at the track, and around town, I feel I'm a little more qualified to talk about capabilities. Hell, I've been to open track days here when there has been close to 100 Vipers there. Is there even 100 Vipers in all of GB???
Where your from means nothing, how many you see on the streets means nothing..

JNasty4G63
Again, you must not be seeing very good Vipers if you think they aren't good around a track. Hell, I've seen a stock old-gen Viper ACR run the table at an auto-x before. Thats bone stock, and it beat every car, in every class. They are very capable cars.
I'm seeing the same ones you are. Can't hav been good competition or good drivers.

JNasty4G63
I don't really like them. I'm just trying to help dispell the myth that they are somehow BAD track cars. And, I also never said a Venom 1000 would "turn an Enzo on it's ass" did I??? No. I simply said that given how well I know Vipers can handle stock, a well setup one with 1000hp could be very, VERY fast at the track.[./QUOTE]
Tell that to all the journalists who've driven them in Europe. You said the Venom would beat an Enzo, it won't simple as.

JNasty4G63
Well, I would hope so. The car weighs 1000lbs less. You know what??? A Yamaha R1 will beat a T350. Oh, wait. Its got 180hp and only weighs 350lbs, it should.
Power to weight isn't that different in the 350 and SRT-10.
 
live4speed
Grip is faster in a race scenario, race drivers don't drift. Auto X may be different due to the way the tracks are laid out, tighter ect I don't know, but on a race track if the back end goes out you've made a mistake.
You're confusing drift racing with a mild drift in racing. I'm not talking about full-on, ass out drifting. I'm talking about mild oversteer or 4-wheel drifts. If its on a track, or at the auto-x, getting a mild 4-wheel drift can be, in many circumstances, very fast. Why do you think rally drivers do it??? It keeps speed up very well. Its not right in every instance. But, it can be very fast.
live4speed
I didn't, I mentioned the TopGear test track, thats not a TV show thats a track, even if you take it as a show thats still only TopGear and not a couple of shows.
OH, I'M SORRY. You mentioned a track that is only used on a TV show, not the actual show. My misunderstanding. 👎
live4speed
Road and track are biased, I have links to times for the TopGears track times, round the Ring it managed a "superb" 8'13, thats slower than the two ton V8 Vantage.
OH, so I find a link to a story that contradicts what you say, and so you say its biased. I get it. Thats cool. And, no need for your links. I can find those 2 just fine. But, if you have any of these other supposed storys where the Viper got beat by these lesser cars, I'd love to see them.
live4speed
Where your from means nothing, how many you see on the streets means nothing.
I didn't mean that in a "I'm American, I know American cars" kind of way. I simply meant that, around here, we know Vipers. I know many people here with Vipers through the various racing I do. I've seen good ones, I've seen bad ones. But, given the regularity and sheer ammount that I see, I feel I know the capability of the car better. If you were to argue with me about TVRs or Astons, and I said I know just as much as you, what would you say???? Think about it man.
live4speed
I'm seeing the same ones you are. Can't hav been good competition or good drivers.
No, you aren't. As I've said, I see Vipers at just about every auto-x and track day. I've probably seen more 750hp track prepared Vipers than you have seen regular Vipers. I don't mean that in a disrespecting way, its just a fact about how many there are around here. And, about the ACR, it was the other way around. It was good car, and great driver. Like you said earlier, you don't know auto-x, so don't talk like you know what happened. In auto-x, the better driver in a slower car will almost always win.
live4speed
Tell that to all the journalists who've driven them in Europe.
OK, you have links for them too???? Again, I'm not trying to make you believe the car is the best in the world. Just that it needs more credit than many people give it. As I said, journalists mean nothing, I've seen first hand MANY times what they can do on a track.
live4speed
You said the Venom would beat an Enzo, it won't simple as.
I said it would keep up, or possibly beat it. Stop trying to make it seem like I said the Venom would walk all over the Enzo. How many times do I have to say that for you to get it. For the 73rd time.....

The Enzo is a great car. But, from what I've seen, a well prepared Viper with 1000hp would give it a hell of a run, and could possibly beat it. Not stomp all over it, but it would be a good challenge.

OK??? Get it???
live4speed
Power to weight isn't that different in the 350 and SRT-10.
If power to weight is the same, which these two are, you always take the lighter car. Again, thats just simple knowledge from auto-x or any racing. Less mass is easier to move around a track. Power to weight is fine for estimating straight line speeds. But, around a track, the lighter car of two similar cars should always win.

Hilg
 
Top Gear is incrediably biased, since we finally get it here in the states now via the Discovery Channel. I try to watch it when I can. They made the new C6 Corvette out to be the biggest pile of s*** on the planet. I'm sorry, I think the Vette holds it own pretty damn well.

The host of the show is a dumbass as far as I'm conserned. He hates it because it's American, you read something like Car and Driver and they hate it because it sucks. Sure I don't always agree with them since I'm a Chevy boy tride and true, but I can't say they are wrong. Hell Car and Driver is by far one of the most balanced magazines I read.

Top Gear bugs me greatly as you can see.

As for the comment about a 1000hp Viper beating an Enzo, I can totally agree with that. Enzos and Ferrari's in general are WAY OVERRATED. Get over it, you are buying a name not a car. Sure they are good around a track but that doesn't mean something can't touch it or totally kick its ass. Now I downright dislike the Viper in every since of the word, but that doesn't mean I don't think its a pretty good car. I've seen Vipers run around the track before and I know they can hold there own. A 1000 pony Viper would ceritanly be able to match an Enzo around the track, and there would be a great chance that it would beat it.
 
This blurb is from the DaimlerChysler media site:

Dodge Announces Pricing for All-New 2006 Viper SRT10 Coupe

All-new 2006 Dodge Viper SRT10 Coupe priced at $83,995

Boasts Viper-signature triple 500s: 505-cubic-inch V-10 engine, 500 horsepower, 525 pound-feet of torque

Zero to 60 mph in under 4 seconds, 0-100-0 mph in low 12 seconds, over 1g on the skidpad

Dodge announced pricing today for the all-new, heart-pounding 2006 Dodge Viper SRT10 Coupe. Returning in hardtop form for the first time since the 2002 model year, the 2006 Dodge Viper SRT10 Coupe is available for $83,995, which includes $850 for destination. The 2006 Dodge Viper SRT10 Coupe arrives in Dodge showrooms in October.

“With heart-pounding performance and head-turning design, Viper is the icon of the Dodge brand,” said Darryl Jackson, Vice President -- Dodge Marketing, Chrysler Group. “The all-new 2006 Dodge Viper SRT10 Coupe is a true Dodge supercar boasting triple 500s – a 505-cubic-inch V-10 engine, 500 horsepower and 525 pound-feet of torque – plus a race-bred, stick-to-the-pavement suspension and braking performance that will separate your retinas.”

The all-new 2006 Dodge Viper SRT10 Coupe features a “double-bubble” roof design and dramatic rear styling with wraparound taillamps reminiscent of the 1996-2002 Dodge Viper GTS Coupe.

Another connection to the Dodge Viper GTS Coupe is the inaugural color scheme: The 2006 Dodge Viper SRT10 Coupe will be launched with a Viper Blue exterior accented with Stone White stripes, a nod to the blue-with-white-stripes motif of the original Dodge Viper GTS Coupe.

To develop the 2006 Dodge Viper SRT10 Coupe, the starting point was the stout structure of the Dodge Viper SRT10 Convertible. With the addition of the roof structure, the Viper SRT10 Coupe becomes even more torsionally rigid than the Convertible. From an aerodynamic standpoint, the all-new 2006 Dodge Viper SRT10 Coupe is designed for downforce and high-speed stability, with a sloping roofline and deck lid spoiler.

In addition to the new canopy and deck lid, the 2006 Dodge Viper SRT10 Coupe has a special windshield surround, door side glass, rear fascia, quarter panels and taillights.

The deck lid for the Dodge Viper SRT10 Coupe was designed for customer convenience as well as structural integrity. The decklid opening is deeply integrated into the rear fascia, which offers a low lift-over height for stowing cargo.

Race-inspired characteristics are evident throughout the cockpit of the 2006 Dodge Viper SRT10 Coupe, which features a performance-oriented, highly functional instrument panel with center-mounted tachometer and 220-mph speedometer.

The 2006 Dodge Viper SRT10 Coupe offers more usable trunk space: 4 cubic feet more than the Dodge Viper SRT10 Convertible, for a total of 6.25 cubic feet.

New options for 2006 on both the Dodge Viper SRT10 Coupe and Dodge Viper SRT10 Convertible include two new styles of forged wheels: an “H-pattern” wheel and a five-spoke wheel (MSRP $700), SIRIUS Satellite Radio (MSRP $195) and dual exterior stripes: silver stripes on red and black cars and black stripes on yellow cars (MSRP $3,000). Additional color and stripe combinations will be introduced throughout the model year.

The first 200 of the all-new 2006 Dodge Viper SRT10 Coupes will be offered with a First Edition package that includes a Viper Blue exterior (the only coupes available in blue) accented with dual Stone White stripes; the five-spoke forged wheels; a car cover with dual stripes; seats and floor mats with contrasting blue stitching and embroidery; parking-brake handle, shift knob and steering wheel all highlighted with contrasting blue stitching and blue leather; and a serialized dash plaque (MSRP $4,995).

An aluminum-block 8.3-liter (505-cubic-inch) V-10 engine powers the all-new Dodge Viper SRT10 Coupe, generating 500 horsepower and 525 pound-feet (712 N•m) of torque — 90 percent of the torque available in the 1,500- to 5,600-rpm range. Transferring the Dodge Viper’s power to the rear wheels is a heavy-duty six-speed manual transmission.

Stopping power is another carefully developed part of the Dodge Viper SRT10 equation, with 14-inch brake rotors gripped by Brembo 44/40 dual opposing piston calipers in the front and Brembo 42/38 dual opposing calipers in the rear. This system results in a world-class braking performance of 60-0 mph in less than 100 feet.

Dodge Viper SRT10 performance is further defined by a race-bred aluminum, four-wheel independent suspension featuring lightweight, high-performance aluminum control arms and knuckles, damped by lightweight coil-over shock absorbers. Where the rubber meets the road, Dodge Viper SRT10 rides on forged aluminum, polished 18-in. x 10-in. front and 19-in. x 13-in. rear wheels, clad in Michelin zero-pressure run-flat tires.



Sure looks nice. Makes you wonder why it took them so long to get around to it:

vipersrt10coupe36751eb.jpg


vipersrt10coupe56751rg.jpg
 
BlazinXtreme
Top Gear is incrediably biased, since we finally get it here in the states now via the Discovery Channel. I try to watch it when I can. They made the new C6 Corvette out to be the biggest pile of s*** on the planet. I'm sorry, I think the Vette holds it own pretty damn well.

The host of the show is a dumbass as far as I'm conserned. He hates it because it's American, you read something like Car and Driver and they hate it because it sucks. Sure I don't always agree with them since I'm a Chevy boy tride and true, but I can't say they are wrong. Hell Car and Driver is by far one of the most balanced magazines I read.

Top Gear bugs me greatly as you can see.

As for the comment about a 1000hp Viper beating an Enzo, I can totally agree with that. Enzos and Ferrari's in general are WAY OVERRATED. Get over it, you are buying a name not a car. Sure they are good around a track but that doesn't mean something can't touch it or totally kick its ass. Now I downright dislike the Viper in every since of the word, but that doesn't mean I don't think its a pretty good car. I've seen Vipers run around the track before and I know they can hold there own. A 1000 pony Viper would ceritanly be able to match an Enzo around the track, and there would be a great chance that it would beat it.
I can't believe this, you've been shown before a link from Famine I think where JC reccomends the C6. They didn't make it out to be pile of **** either, they had a joke about American cars and their reputation and the leaf springs, they test drove it and then took it onto the track and said it was very good. Where does your sense of humour go when it's an American product being used in the joke. JC makes fun of British cars, he makes fun of German cars he makes fun of Japanese cars, Italian cars AND American cars. So wheres the Bias. As for Ferrari's, performance wise, they are superb, performance/cost they arn't. The Enzo will stomp on a 1000Bhp Viper, the Speed 12 will stomp on a 1000Bhp Viper, why, the car from the first nut is built to be as fast as it is, the Viper is built to handle 500Bhp and it doesn'y do that as well as the Enzo handles over 600. I've seen road Vipers run at tracks myself, and the results are average at best.

As for the links and articles, most of what I get is in magazines, I didn't think you'd need a link to www.bbc.co.uk/topgear for their track times, and ring times can be found all over the place. Thats what Google is for.

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/roadtest/53061/snakes_kin.html
This article covers a road test comparison between the SRT-10 and SL55, like TopGear, this British mag LIKES the VIper, but it still points out it's flaws like they're supposed to.
http://www.autocar.co.uk/FirstDrive_Summary.asp?RT=212560 Another road test.

Road and Track are very biased towards American cars, if you think TopGears biased, road and track are two fold, put nearly every American sportscar well above what it car really do, ie get beat by an M3 and T350. The M3 and T350 can't corner nearly as well as an Enzo, they don't go as fast in a straight line as the Viper either, so why do they both beat the Viper in track tests all the time if the Viper is nearly as good as the Enzo at corners and faster than these in acceleration, it doesn't add up. You've never seen a Viper tested head to head with an Enzo, the closest we have is the SRT-10 on the TopGear track, and it's underachieved, we have ring times that back this up, we have track day tests in magazines, that back this up.

I don't know maybe on wider tracks the Viper can be better, over here it's too pricey, and not fast enough to keep up. It's not a great road car, it's not a great track car, the C6 beats it convincingly in every test and costs over 20k less. Ther T350C beats it and costs nearly 40k less, it's a no brainer, the Viper is an under achiever it should either cost less, or be built to go faster stock. You can't argue when theres ring times that say it's slower and a topgear time that shows the same thing. Even if you persist in believing the presenters are biased the car was still driven hard round the track and it was slower.
 
I'm not getting into this again, because you are all pig headed when it comes to me trying to tell you something. I've watched the show, the way I saw it JC hated the Vette among other American cars. I think the show is grossly biased towards British cars.

I'm standing by my guns saying the Ferrari's are overrated, and I believe your precious TVR's are overrated as well. I'm going to bet that the Viper would keep up with the Enzo. You have the stupid misconception that all American cars are pigs when it comes to the track and can only travel in a straight line. Which is by far one of the stupidest things in the world. I can think of several American track preformers.

Did I say anything about Road and Track? No, because I don't read it to often, but if anything they enjoy Japanese cars more then anything.

C6 beats it convincingly in every test and costs over 20k less.
Well known fact.
 
How is TopGear biased towards British cars, he slags off TVR, he slags off Vauxhall he slagged off Rover, I just find it funny that you see past that, you just see him slagging American cars, like there the only cars he slags. I never said you referred to road and track either, that second paragraph onwards wasn't directed at you at all, that was directed at JNasty who I've been debating with so far. How you think comments saying the C6 handles well, and it's very fast are slagging the car off is beyond me, and yes they did say that on TopGear. In an article Jerremy even said people should consider the C6. Biased, I don't think so. A lot of the presenting on TopGear is based around humour, it's very easilly recognisable like the time JC timed people getting into and starting up a TVR, it was to make a joke that the TVR isn't your average car, it's unique it's different it takes getting used to.
 
Everytime I watch it I never see him say anything negative towards decentish British cars. And think about it, if he says something bad about Vauxhall, it's knocking GM, which is American.

I remember he called the Corvette's technology was ancient. I work with Corvette's for a living and my bills are paid for by the company that builds the Vette's. I know far to much about the inner workings of a Vette. It makes me mad when I hear its ancient technology since the stuff I engineer is on that vehicle.

You think Top Gear is humorous? Wow I found it just stupid as all hell.
 
He still says bad things about TVR, theres two British companies he hasn't knocked, Lotus and Noble, yes he's knocked Aston Martin before. You can apply your Vauxhall/GM logic if you want, but thats YOUR idea, the comment about the technology was again for humour (points out leaf springs) yes it works, leaf springs are a very old setup, but it works, didn't he mention that it works when he praised the cars handling? Yes, he did. If he hates the car so much, why did he say people after a serious sportscar should consider one/ Because he doesn't hate the car he makes jokes about it just like almost every other car on there. thats not bisaed against American cars.
 
Back