- 2,843
- Lincoln
- Victory_Reign93
- Linthium Reign
I wouldn't be surprised if anyone hits 350km/h in the race with KERS, DRS and drafting, hell even 360km/h wouldn't be too far fetched in the right circumstances.
Nope, Monza will be because the downforce for Monza is significantly lower.Why are the Hamilton haters always so abusive and full of hyperbole?
Anyway, interested to see the top speeds on low fuel and DRS, and also the transmission lengths on some of the teams. Won't Mexico next year be the best track to see these car's top speeds? Fast final corner leading on to a huge straight if I remember, unless it has changed substantially over the years.
350km/h should be easy tbh, Hamilton got 346km/h at Hockenhiem with draft and DRS.I wouldn't be surprised if anyone hits 350km/h in the race with KERS, DRS and drafting, hell even 360km/h wouldn't be too far fetched in the right circumstances.
Nope, Monza will be because the downforce for Monza is significantly lower.
Remember that the parabolica will not be used in full this time at Mexico...The reason why I'm thinking Mexico could see higher top speeds is because Monza has always been a low downforce track, but cars in the past at Mexico were reaching similar speeds with more downforce.
In this era of F1 aerodynamics, the cars to a degree are low downforce all year round, Monza is not going to be as big of a leap top speed wise in the calendar compared to other years.
http://www.auto123.com/en/racing-news/f1-top-speeds-at-monza-to-be-lower-than-expected?artid=170709
If I have my facts right, when G.Berger was driving one of the most powerful F1 cars in history, the top speed difference between his Monza and Mexico top speed was only about 4mph (but I could be mixing up my years). This in an age with no DRS at the time. With the Mexico GP straight being a lil' bit longer than Monza's, I'm going to assume it will also have a slightly faster DRS zone too.
@mustafur The racing may have not been that great, but remember that there was no KERS, ERS, or DRS at the time. Passes back then were not often, but when they happened, boy were they breath taking! I think they should return to the pre 2008 chassis style, today's cars look hideous but they too have made overtaking easier and the races more enjoyable for the new fans.
I wonder why exactly they would want to resurface it? It looks really nice by the way and I see the guardrails are new.It's definitely been resurfaced. Looks really smooth.. or at least a lot smoother than it had been.
![]()
That won't work. Sound is produced by energy being released, but the current engines work on the principle of recapturing wasted energy and putting it to better use. Any energy that is spent on sound cannot be recaptured.Perhaps they can make super loud speakers in the exhaust exits and make them sound like V10s and V12s.
It gets used for the Monza Rally.I wonder why exactly they would want to resurface it? It looks really nice by the way and I see the guardrails are new.
The faster they go, the better. The oval however would be way to dangerous for F1 due to the bumpiness and they lack of safety (only a guardrail separates the track from the outside part of the track).I wonder if the FIA will change the track next year to slow down the cars.
We are seeing them hit 345km/h easy and would be getting "dangerous" to the FIA.
I would also love to see the F1s drive on the old oval.
It hasn't been used for racing for decades....On Sky marc Surer said the surface is way to bumpy to be used for racing.... Well, maybe not for rallying.
If that speed was from FP1.. it's because he was down on power, possibly due to his turbo failing.
Is the dumb fuel flow limit in effect for qualifying or is it just the race?Sounds like they are hitting the limiter quite early.