- 4,763
- Houston, TX
Man, I love the current Lexus interior. Shame the outside isn't as clean as the inside.
I wholeheartedly disagree. Why shouldn't Lexus make a version of the RCF more competitive with the M4? Wouldn't that be a good thing?Oh God no...
This is everything the RC-F isn't meant to be. It's supposed to be a GT car, not an M4 competitor.
For goodness sakes Lexus, it was a great car, keep your hands off it and work on that LC-F!
I wholeheartedly disagree. Why shouldn't Lexus make a version of the RCF more competitive with the M4? Wouldn't that be a good thing?
First, the car is a M4 competitor. They're in the same luxury performance segment, they're in the same power bracket, and they're in the same price bracket. They've been compared many, many times over the years. Whether that was Lexus' exact intention or not, they built a car that sits in the M4 market.Oh God no...
This is everything the RC-F isn't meant to be. It's supposed to be a GT car, not an M4 competitor.
For goodness sakes Lexus, it was a great car, keep your hands off it and work on that LC-F!
If Lexus has learned anything from the RC line's poor sales following the honeymoon phase of a new car, they'll keep the facelifted RC F under $65,000, and price this around $90,000-$95,000. A fully-loaded RC F is around $83,000, so that leaves enough room for an owner to consider making the jump and paying the extra $7,000-$12,000 for the GT's improvements. Tack on a couple "options" that are usually built into every car as if they were standard (such as Nav. & Premium Pkg for the base RC F), and the car should start right around $95,000-$100,000 before you add anything else. Depending on how hardcore the GT is, this could sit fairly well next to the LC without intrusion.Exactly - The more Lexus uses the F brand to challenge M products, the more interest there will be. We already know an LC-F is in the works, so it is not like the RC-F GT has interfered with development.
I hope the RC-F doesn't go too crazy with the price increase. The prototype lacks a rollcage so it is more like a competitor to the M4 CS rather than M4 GTS. Even then, the former still costs about 40% more than a standard M4. Target price, in my opinion, should undercut a Nissan GT-R (i.e. less than £80k)
This is about as ass-backwards as it gets.This is everything the RC-F isn't meant to be. It's supposed to be a GT car, not an M4 competitor.
For goodness sakes Lexus, it was a great car, keep your hands off it and work on that LC-F!
The RC proved to have a pretty lame chassis in all its testing. The LC is actually the better sports car.You don't want them to focus on making a performance version of their smaller coupe, but on the LC, which itself is a large and heavy GT car?