2015 Ford Mustang - General Discussion

  • Thread starter CodeRedR51
  • 6,247 comments
  • 418,434 views
Test car spotted on the streets.

2015-mustang-spy-1tt.jpg


You can kinda see the grill...I sorta of like it. The body still shows lines to that of a '69-'70.

http://www.themustangnews.com/conte...ng-spied-on-streets-of-dearborn/#.Ubu6tPlwqjM
 
Looks smaller than 5th gen.

I've heard its smaller by a large margin but not small enough that it can't retain it's signature long hood/short rear deck looks. 200lbs lighter is what it's expected to be.
 
They probably dropped it back down to Fox Body size.

If it's that size again, that much lighter with similar power figures and an awesome design this could be one of the best Mustangs yet.


But right now I'm preparing for another Mustang II. That seems to be what everyone is afraid of right now.
 
But right now I'm preparing for another Mustang II. That seems to be what everyone is afraid of right now.

A lot of people are probably also scared of the proposed Ecoboost turbo 4 cylinder engine for the Mustang as well, not just the styling changes. I'm just happy it's coming to the UK in right hand drive.
 
It does look like it's about on par with the foxbody in terms of size. If so, I'd be quite happy. I always thought my old foxbody was the perfect size.
 
AudiMan2011
A lot of people are probably also scared of the proposed Ecoboost turbo 4 cylinder engine for the Mustang as well, not just the styling changes. I'm just happy it's coming to the UK in right hand drive.

Why? It's not like there won't be a V8 available.
 
Why? It's not like there won't be a V8 available.

When people think Mustang they always imagine a V8. People would think a 4 cylinder Mustang in America sold alongside the V8 would not be the Mustang way. I think a 4 cylinder Mustang would make more sense in Europe and the UK in regards to fuel economy as well as different buying tastes.
 
But right now I'm preparing for another Mustang II. That seems to be what everyone is afraid of right now.

That's what I see. A fox-body would be OK, but what I see in the front and in the profile, it looks like Ford is planning to go through ALL the old mustang designs. Unfortunately, the Mustang II is next in line. Fortunately, technology has made massive leaps in the 30-40 years since the original. People are whining about a 4-banger in a mustang right now, I guarantee that if it's a Ecoboost engine, they will try it once and proceed to shut up.
 
A 2.0 Turbo can work, and it can work well. Modern ones are mostly lag free, and can be tuned for any characteristic you desire, whether it be a great big lump of midrange torque, a linear powerband or high-revving silliness.

I don't see anything fundamentally wrong with a 2.0 Mustang with 270 odd horses. People have put up with asthmatic V6s (except the 3.7) in Mustangs over the years, so why not give them a base motor that can actually scoot?
 
Wonder if it might be a juiced up version of what's in the Focus ST. That car can really move.
 
The 4 cylinder Ecoboost engine mooted for the next Mustang is said to be a modified version of the motor in the Focus ST, increased to 2.3 liters and pushing 330-350hp. That same engine is also reported to be going in the next Focus RS.
 
330 for the four-banger? And yet they still need the V6? Fuhgeddaboutit.

2.3 and 5.0, just like the good old days.

No, really, we swear, we didn't pick that exact displacement on purpose. :lol:
 
Remember the 180hp 1.8L in the Corolla/Matrix XRS and how amazing it was to get 100hp/L? :lol:

But seriously, 330hp from a 2.3L is amazing. I'm also really interested in the Focus ST/RS at some point, love hot hatches.
 
A 2.0 Turbo can work, and it can work well. Modern ones are mostly lag free, and can be tuned for any characteristic you desire, whether it be a great big lump of midrange torque, a linear powerband or high-revving silliness.

I don't see anything fundamentally wrong with a 2.0 Mustang with 270 odd horses. People have put up with asthmatic V6s (except the 3.7) in Mustangs over the years, so why not give them a base motor that can actually scoot?

Just curios, what year of Mustang had the 3.7 V6?

EDIT: Just read online that it's the 2011 model year and beyond. In which case, the engine in my Mustang is the 3.7.

I personally find the engine to be brilliant. With such a good V6, I don't see the point of putting an Eco-Boost engine in the car. Simply because I'm afraid people will say "Eco-Boost doesn't work for a Mustang" and it just won't sell as much as a V6 would, despite any benefits..
 
A new Mustang that looks about foxbody sized with a turbo 4 cylinder? Bring back the SVO!
 
When people think Mustang they always imagine a V8. People would think a 4 cylinder Mustang in America sold alongside the V8 would not be the Mustang way. I think a 4 cylinder Mustang would make more sense in Europe and the UK in regards to fuel economy as well as different buying tastes.
They did it before and it sold in droves.
A new Mustang that looks about foxbody sized with a turbo 4 cylinder? Bring back the SVO!

A new SVO would be sweet alongside a new SVT Cobra.
 
Just curios, what year of Mustang had the 3.7 V6?

EDIT: Just read online that it's the 2011 model year and beyond. In which case, the engine in my Mustang is the 3.7.

I personally find the engine to be brilliant. With such a good V6, I don't see the point of putting an Eco-Boost engine in the car. Simply because I'm afraid people will say "Eco-Boost doesn't work for a Mustang" and it just won't sell as much as a V6 would, despite any benefits..

Much as I like that V6, which makes even something as big as the CX9 a hoot, the Ecoboost is likely what the Mustang needs to survive future CAFE regulations.
 
Last edited:
I'll just say this. The 2 liter ecoboost in the Focus ST is stronger than the V6 in the base Mustang. It feels far gruntier down low and has incredible top end as well. My brother has a ST and the engine is the highlight of that car. It's just a ball of fury. I can only imagine how awesome it would feel in a RWD car with more power.
 
A report from Mustangs Daily—confirmed and added to by our friends at Road & Track—reveals that the next-generation Ford Mustang‘s SVT model will swap its Shelby GT500 moniker for a GT350 badge. Recall that the original GT350 lived alongside the GT500 back in the late 1960s, and Shelby American currently sells a GT350 apart from the Shelby GT500 sold through Ford dealers. Look for the new GT350 to arrive as a 2016 model about a year after the redesigned, un-retro 2015 Mustang arrives.

The name change will be accompanied by a slight change in character, as well. Today’s GT500 is a 662-hp, supercharged beast that feels more at home on a drag strip than a road course. Expect that to change with the new GT350, which reportedly will feature a naturally aspirated V-8 based on the Mustang GT’s 5.0-liter Coyote motor. R&T says the mill won’t necessarily displace 5.0 liters, though, and could pack even more displacement to help bolster its horsepower advantage over the regular Mustang GT.

More interesting still, like the original GT350, the new one will be more of a stripped-down, performance-oriented offering. Hopefully it isn’t too stripped down—as you can see from our original road test of a 1965 Shelby GT350, it basically was a race car—but Road & Track does hint that it could be priced lower than today’s nearly $55,000 GT500. As expected, when reached for comment, Ford refused to confirm or deny anything regarding the future Mustang or its possible variants. Our bet is that the GT350 will move to fill the void left by the now-departed Boss 302, but with the added cache of a Shelby badge. Either way, color us excited.

Car and Driver


This is pretty big news. The last un-supercharged SVT Mustang was the 2001 Mustang Cobra. After that they got consistently heavier and arguably less track-suited resulting in the true clown-car 660hp GT500 we have today.

Hopefully this will usher in a successor to this:
2000FordMustangCobraR.jpg


The Boss 302 LS is somewhat like that, but it's not an SVT product.
 
The 302 LS is already pretty hardcore. Also, it is unknown whether the Boss will even carry over to the new car.

The new Boss 302 won't carry over as it was a 2 year production run only like the original. That said, what's to stop them from doing a Boss 429 or Boss 351 (more likely)...
 
Well, it's not like Ford is collecting all of the 07-13 GT500s and sending them to the shredder. If they follow the trend of the other Cobras (non R models) they will steeply depreciate as well, so you may soon be able to buy one for cheap!
 
I wonder how much displacement they could add to the coyote before the head flow becomes a limiting factor. Isn't that what's said about that engine? That the heads flow for days?
 
I wonder how much displacement they could add to the coyote before the head flow becomes a limiting factor. Isn't that what's said about that engine? That the heads flow for days?

I don't know if they will. I'm not sure how much more displacement the engine can withstand. I know they make 5.8L Coyote stroker kits and haven't seen much else so I think that's as far as the stock block can go unless they go with a physically larger block and I doubt that will happen and/or be worth it.
 
Surely they don't need more displacement? I bet that they could get 450 bhp from 5.0 litres with some fairly simple modifications.
 
Back