Everything is a race car to you though lol.Might make a nice base as a Production Touring Car.
"maintain the balance in speed and corning"
I wouldn't have done that either. But maybe that's just me....should of just called it an SE-R if they had to.
A video of the Sentra and the guy announcing the car is claiming that the reason for it having no more power than a SR Turbo is to "maintain the balance in speed and corning".
Honestly, I feel a bit frustrated about the power figures. I mean, it's the "Nismo" model and from Nismo; I expect high performance figures. I guess maybe it's due to the fact I keep thinking of the 400R and the current Nissan GT-R Nismo's performance. I really was hoping that the Sentra would get the same kind of crazy treatment, it's kinda a shame really.
TRD and Mugen have made their own specials Before(Japan only) but Ralliart is basically like a badge on mid range cars, kind of like this.While I agree with you I don't agree with your conclusion as to why you thought such. Is it a blow to the Nismo brand yeah. Why? Because Nismo isn't like other groups or until this came out as well as the Juke before it did I believe Nismo wasn't like other associated Japanese performance off brands. To me this is a blow, because I also have to ask, when did Nismo become TRD or Mugen (though not official they did have official honda cars sold), or even Ralliart.
TRD and Mugen have made their own specials Before(Japan only) but Ralliart is basically like a badge on mid range cars, kind of like this.
I wasn't comparing Nismo to other brands, I didn't say anything like that. I was saying that I was expecting the Sentra to have big performance improvements over the regular Sentra. It comes off now as nothing more than a sticker package.Why? Because Nismo isn't like other groups or until this came out as well as the Juke before it did I believe Nismo wasn't like other associated Japanese performance off brands.
I wasn't comparing Nismo to other brands, I didn't say anything like that. I was saying that I was expecting the Sentra to have big performance improvements over the regular Sentra. It comes off now as nothing more than a sticker package.
Oh sorry, I got confused on what you were disagreeing with me about; I should have just asked to make sure.I never said you said anything like that nor implied not sure why your post seems to be worded the way it was. I'm simply going off the idea of a sticker package (believe it or not I understood what you were saying)
Okay then, I can understand that.In simple terms, I'm saying yeah it's sad that they didn't put much effort into it, not because of what you stated (sticker package) but because of the way I see it more so obviously. A car that doesn't live up to the nismo brand.
This NISMO Jp website shows the March as a performance enhanced package http://www.nismo.co.jp/en/products/complete/march_stune/top.html. When I read the Nissan USA websitehttp://www.nissanusa.com/cars/2017-sentra-nismo , the Nismo Sentra reads just like that March S-tune. I think this is to continue to educate USA buyers about Nismo at an affordable price. My mom bought a Juke Nismo because she wanted a newer, flashier Juke.
I remember the USA 350Z had optional Nismo wheels and aero bits. I don't feel it dumbed down the brand. Hardcore enthusiasts may think so. Some may be disappointed in this Sentra. Maybe Nissan are testing the waters.
Testing as far as the market. How many they can sell, may determine if they continue to offer NISMO products in that price range. Or else, why offer(as compared to the higher hp SE-R) a lower hp-performing model, as a Nismo?A re-tuned suspension and added body stiffness are just a few of the NISMO-specific enhancements that drive the Sentra NISMO. From sharp curves to straightaways, the difference is palpable. Grip the 370Z®-inspired steering wheel as you feel the turbocharged engine rev, and you'll know that the Sentra NISMO is one of a kind.
So why is Nissan marketing it as a Nismo? The site is pretty much saying it's a Nismo tuned car.
Testing as far as the market. How many they can sell, may determine if they continue to offer NISMO products in that price range. Or else, why offer(as compared to the higher hp SE-R) a lower hp-performing model, as a Nismo?
Your question to my last sentence was, "Testing them how?". I was referring to this car as a marketing exercise.Not sure I understand your question, to me it could be rhetorical but on second glance perhaps not. They are marketing it as a Nismo cause it is one, despite how tame. The point still stands the SR turbo is the same thing as this without the body kit and supposed go fast suspension. I'm guessing the SR turbo is the more econo family car with a nice ride and no need for track car like interior or sport cup tires. Power is the same, transmission options and over all car the same. So my question is yet again...why was this slated as the low priced Nismo fighter, when the original running concept was more of akin to Nismo?
It baffles me and makes me lose a bit more respect for Nissan, they toss away good concepts to never see the light of day, the concepts that they do bring are watered down when they hit production...and then the limited Nismo variants don't help matters. To be honest only R1600 probably knows the answer, and I wont push it out of him because he's got a job to hold down.
Your question to my last sentence was, "Testing them how?". I was referring to this car as a marketing exercise.