- 50,779
- Australia
- SpacedustDaddy
Oh. Haha. Nooooo.You mentioned if they used VG, the Ford boys 'would have a field day'. Assumed you meant because the Transit uses VG.
V:censored:g:censored:
Oh. Haha. Nooooo.You mentioned if they used VG, the Ford boys 'would have a field day'. Assumed you meant because the Transit uses VG.
For the record, the G8 flopped because the petrol prices and more importantly the recession. GM released a V8 family car at the absolute worst possible time.The ability for Zeta to get any widespread release in its sedan form in North America largely passed when GM ran out of money to actually finish developing the initially planned North American versions in 2004. It's a miracle that the Camaro was even built, but a good portion of that probably has to do with how much egg GM got on their face with the retro Mustang basically revitalizing a market that GM had largely just ceded to Ford. After the G8 flopped and gas prices went crazy and the entire company went banktrupt, the remaining efforts within the company to replace at least some of the cars it was originally supposed to replace (the DTS and Impala and supposedly the Lucerne) were scuttled as well; and it's hard to claim it wasn't for good reason.
GM was much wiser to not force the issue like they had tried to disastrous effect when the W-Body debuted in 1988. It meant the W and G Body were around a good while longer than originally intended even by GM standards, but the 14th floor was undoubtedly desperate to find profit somewhere at that point anyway.
and gas prices went crazy and the entire company went banktrupt
GM had been trying for some time to position Pontiac as the performance arm of the company. (Yet the Camaro and Corvette are Chevrolet-go figure) makes sense from a packaging standpoint, each marque being a specific design ethos. But didn't from the standpoint of the buying public. Thus Pontiac was redundant in the face of performance Chevrolet models and Cadillac becoming 'performance luxury'.And it should have been an Impala SS and Caprice.
The best option would've been to sell the Commodore as the Caprice in America. The name has meaning, and they could sell the Impala alongside. They already sold the Calais to the police as the Caprice, makes sense to sell the civvie one the same way.
And it should have been an Impala SS and Caprice.
The Caprice over here, were long wheelbase and fitted with V6 & V8. Plus they were fitted with TV screens in the headrest. Would have been a good car vs the 300C.
It most likely would've been priced within a few hundred of the Charger. The current SS is an example of what it would cost fully kitted out (which the SS is). Baser V6 and V8 models definitely would've been between 25-35k. Reasonable prices for a large family saloon.There are a lot of assumptions to be made about GM and their tiers of product at the time. A full size, rear drive, semi-luxury sedan available at Chevrolet would have stepped over and through a lot of products that were on the table from Pontiac, Buick, Saab, and Cadillac. A cheap option like that would have been great to take on cars like the Dodge Charger and 300C, but it would have eaten away a lot of potential for the already tepid sales of the Sigma-based Cadillacs. Even then, it ignores the fact that a rear drive Impala and Caprice likely would have been a good bit more expensive than the outgoing front drive models, and that would have only expedited the slowing sales for their large car market.
Edit: Just adding, if this NG is making its way to the USA as a Buick, what's a reasonable price for a top spec model?
Well can't forget exchange rates. And on the road taxes as well. In early 2008 the exchange rate was roughly .80 AUD for every $1 USD. Basic maths puts 45k in AUD to around 35k USD. Which is right about what the V8 model went for in America. Of course the economy tanked about 4 months before the G8 went on sale, so exchange rates went wild at that time.No doubt. When the 300C came out, Chevy was in limbo. A Commodore Calais V6 would have made for a good fleet vehicle to replace the fwd Impalas.
V8 models in 2000, would have transitioned the Catera as well.
The Lincoln LSV8 was coming out then as well. The time was ripe as I think Infiniti had the M45 V8 dropping in 2001(?). Either branding an HSV Grange(top of the line performance Caprice) with a Cadillac crest and/or Chevy/Buick/Pontiac badges, would have helped the whole of GM. In my opinion.
GM managed to undercut the G8 in the states. It was under $30k for a performance V8 where it was a $45kAUD car is Oz. I feel, changing front clips and badging for the VE, in the USA, would have changed things around.
Edit: Just adding, if this NG is making its way to the USA as a Buick, what's a reasonable price for a top spec model?
the NG Commodore (or possibly GB if we follow Holden’s code for the existing GA Insignia VXR)
I'd agree, but other than me being a Ford guy, it would have taken you, me and many people, to have kept buying Commodores over Mazda3s and Hyundai's. Sadly, it just wasn't happening.I hope it fails. I hope it completely and utterly falls flat on its face. I hope not a single one leaves a dealership. Then GM will learn the mistake they've made in shafting Australian workers and the ANZ car buying public.
I'm a Ford boy myself too. Doesn't mean I'd kick a V8 Holden out of bed. Guess I'm just a slut, hah.I'd agree, but other than me being a Ford guy, it would have taken you, me and many people, to have kept buying Commodores over Mazda3s and Hyundai's. Sadly, it just wasn't happening.
I'd love to see the numbers with faults per 100. I do hope it's a good product. I think the aftermarket may take well to it.
Had to look it up. I don't see any 2017 Malibu's on sale. Think 2016 was the last year.Here in the US, the Regal is usually marked quite well for build quality and reliability. Early models were German made, later ones shifted production to Canada - at least for the North American market. I'd be curious to know where the build numbers end up shifting for your Commodore, as the plants that currently build variants of the Insignia are in Germany, China, and Canada. If they end up being Chinese, I wouldn't worry much. The new Buick Envision is assembled and shipped to the US from China, and quality standards have been far beyond what we were expecting.
Weird for me is how they still have the previous-generation Malibu on sale at Holden, right alongside the Insignia. I'd assume both of those models are getting the axe in favor of the new Commodore, then?
Yep, Malibu no longer on sale down here. Epica was a rebadged Daewoo & the Insignia was only sold through Opel dealers for the 12 months the GM experiment lasted.Had to look it up. I don't see any 2017 Malibu's on sale. Think 2016 was the last year.
Insignia was first on sale through HSV/Opel? I think that was at the same time the old Malibu/Epica was out.
I may see one or two Malibus on the road.
I'm sure I've seen Holden Insignia's for sale at Holden dealers too?Yep, Malibu no longer on sale down here. Epica was a rebadged Daewoo & the Insignia was only sold through Opel dealers for the 12 months the GM experiment lasted.
I can assure you they definitely weren't badged as Holdens.I'm sure I've seen Holden Insignia's for sale at Holden dealers too?
No, Holden started Selling all the Opels as Holdens in the last few years.I can assure you they definitely weren't badged as Holdens.
Maybe one of the larger Holden dealers jumped on board the Opel experiment & sold the Opel range alongside the Holdens?
Surely the dealer would've had to have had some 'Opel' signage but it was lost in all the Holden garb?
I do know Holden weren't exactly thrilled with their German cousin crashing the party so to speak & can't imagine any Holden dealer being given permission to sell the Opel range from a Holden yard.
Either way, Opel didn't sell enough cars & the pin was pulled.
No, Holden started Selling all the Opels as Holdens in the last few years.
https://www.carsales.com.au/demo/details/Holden-Insignia-2015/AGC-AD-18005218/?Cr=0
I hope it fails. I hope it completely and utterly falls flat on its face. I hope not a single one leaves a dealership. Then GM will learn the mistake they've made in shafting Australian workers and the ANZ car buying public.
The problem is. For it to have been profitable enough, it would've had to have sold close to 200,000 or so cars a year. This is for a car only sold in large numbers in Australia and New Zealand. That would make it by a wide margin the highest selling car in the country. That would mean 12% of the country would have to drive a Commodore.How exactly did they shaft people, if the sales aren't enough and the money to keep the lights on isn't there, why eat into sales of successful GM markets? I say if the marketing in Australia wasn't so old world as far as the big domestics go, they'd have shifted thought and made cars that were much smaller and efficient and then produced smaller units of the cars that go racing. But Holden and Ford didn't do that and let's be clear these two weren't the only ones losing on sales, Toyota and others had left Australia manufacturing too. So clearly it would be seen as a domestic problem and not something to pin on manufactures.
I don't know Australian laws, but I'd look there to see why manufactures packed up and said they'll import cars in. Cause sales only tell so much of the story.
The problem is. For it to have been profitable enough, it would've had to have sold close to 200,000 or so cars a year. This is for a car only sold in large numbers in Australia and New Zealand. That would make it by a wide margin the highest selling car in the country. That would mean 12% of the country would have to drive a Commodore.
Lest you forget, the Commodore is the best selling executive car in Australia. Outselling BMW, Mercedes, Audi, and everything else in the class. It was a sales success by all measure, and was killed simply because it was numerically impossible to sell enough cars in Australia alone.
To answer your question on how the shafted people, the answer is obvious. Rather than evolve it into a car that could be sold worldwide so that it could meet the sales numbers, they thought it better to just cancel it.
So lemme rephrase your first comment. Who cares if it sold well? It wasn't a historical brand (except it is) so it was a failure. What kinda logic is that?So what if it's the best selling exec car. If the car isn't bought by a ton to begin with and there is no rich history for German and other Euros in the nation. Of course the domestics will outsell. The problem is the cars manufacturing ate into sells and once again (which you fail to acknowledge) wasn't the only group to do this. Even cheaper manufactured cars from Toyota have ceased before Ford and Holden. Realistically the numbers needed and the direction of the market are all reasons why the car is gone. You seem to want it to stay in manufacturing despite all of that, just to say it's Australian made?
Oh so spend even more money, and potentially risk money for other manufactures plants across the globe, that makes sense. I knew Nationalism was big there but wow this is a new level.
Also the Zeta platform and this car in general as talked about through the zeta thread show the car as global mark.
Thing is, I don't see any other gas-guzzlers on this list. Once again, why buy a V8(unless it's a Land Cruiser) to tow your caravan, when a deisel ute can do that and carry the family, with all the amemities a wagon has?Top 10 selling models 2016
Model Sales Variance %
Toyota HiLux 42,104 +19
Toyota Corolla 40,330 -4.1
Hyundai i30 37,772 +16.9
Ford Ranger 36,934 +24.6
Mazda3 36,107 -6.6
Toyota Camry 26,485 -4.2
Holden Commodore 25,860 -6.9
Mazda CX-5 24,564 -2.3
Mitsubishi Triton 21,897 -8.7
Hyundai Tucson 20,132 +273.5