- 4,496
- Indiana
- DolphDrago
Lol. The refs help decide another one.
How was it not fair? How was it tampered with? How would the NFL "come clean"?There will always be conspiracy theories, the real issue is how many turn out to be true. No matter how true individual conspiracies end up being, the NFL has to do better in trying to regain trust with the fans. As of now I don't have trust in any game because if the NFL can't convince most people that the most important game isn't tampered with in whatever ways then why should I believe that any game is completely fair. Whatever did or didn't happen, the NFL needs to come clean and do whatever they can to ensure that there is never this much uncertainty again.
The NFL could come clean by releasing their own evidence like comparing with past calls for various controversial moments to prove there wasn't anything unfair or tampered with. The NFL has enough money where they could even pay for a primetime slot on TV like a PSA or address better documenting various plays and they could have on various former referees and maybe who was involved in the controversy so they can share their takes and knowledge plus maybe it could be done live and there could be interviews and answering fan questions after the presentation.How was it not fair? How was it tampered with? How would the NFL "come clean"?
Isn't it kinda like a rugby referee suddenly calling a bad scrum put in at the death of a match?Is everybody talking about the Bradberry holding Smith-Schuster call? Because that's holding all day long. That's a no doubter. Even Bradberry himself said he held but was hoping the refs wouldn't call it. You have to call that.
Oh and if you want to go back to the Cincy game and complain about the late call on the push on Mahomes out of bounds? Yeah that's a penalty also.
Look I don't have a rooting interest in the NFL. I don't care who wins. But you guys have to get rid of these ******** ****ing conspiracy theories.
I don't know what everyone is talking about with the game being spoiled by the refs. I think they did a good job. If Philly didn't turn the ball over twice for TDs each time, they would have won easily. The game was outstanding-- not sure why people are throwing all of that away to put focus on the refs.I was disappointed with everything this year. Typically I'm excited for the Super Bowl but this year was just so meh. The NFL wants the Chiefs to be the dominant team so bad that the officiating was as lopsided as it's been all playoffs. I didn't really care who won, but I'm so tired of the refs influencing the game like that. If you're going to call stuff, be consistent.
Even the extras were lame too with uncreative commercials and a terrible halftime show. I mean I get Kanye is toxic and shouldn't be there, but you're really going do two Jay-Z songs and not have him as the special guest? I think I got spoiled last year with such a killer show.
I will fully agree that the officiating is inconsistent, but the middle of a game winning drive is a bad time to test that. If that penalty isn’t called, and KC misses the field goal/ loses the game that would look a lot worse on the refs.Isn't it kinda like a rugby referee suddenly calling a bad scrum put in at the death of a match?
As in both teams do it throughout a match and generally it's overlooked unless it's a flagrant violation?
I don't see how that would work. The ref involved comes on and says, "the Eagles defender tugged on the jersey, by rule that's holding and I threw the flag". End of controversy? I doubt it.The NFL could come clean by releasing their own evidence like comparing with past calls for various controversial moments to prove there wasn't anything unfair or tampered with. The NFL has enough money where they could even pay for a primetime slot on TV like a PSA or address better documenting various plays and they could have on various former referees and maybe who was involved in the controversy so they can share their takes and knowledge plus maybe it could be done live and there could be interviews and answering fan questions after the presentation.
Given the way controversies about almost any topic go nowadays it is better to address it quickly and honestly instead of ignoring it and acting like rumors aren't just going to become more and more common.
It was mostly the penalty with less than 2 minutes left against James Bradberry. Yes, it was holding, but those holds were constant throughout the game and the refs chose to throw a flag on that hold but not the others. I'm not annoyed it was called, I'm annoyed that the refs are inconsistent in their officiating. If you're going to call holds, then call holds.I don't know what everyone is talking about with the game being spoiled by the refs. I think they did a good job. If Philly didn't turn the ball over twice for TDs each time, they would have won easily. The game was outstanding-- not sure why people are throwing all of that away to put focus on the refs.
Then get rid of holding all together is that's what you're mad about. Take a defensive lineman to the ground and just hold him there. Wide receiver makes a cut, just tackle him, who cares right? Holding is ruining your game so it has to go. After all everyone does it .It was mostly the penalty with less than 2 minutes left against James Bradberry. Yes, it was holding, but those holds were constant throughout the game and the refs chose to throw a flag on that hold but not the others. I'm not annoyed it was called, I'm annoyed that the refs are inconsistent in their officiating. If you're going to call holds, then call holds.
Holding is a stupid penalty though. It ruins games, influences outcomes, and is something everyone does.
It's called way too frequently and way too inconsistently. Throughout the season, offensive holding was the most frequent penalty called at 581 times for 5,579 yds averaging 16.91 yds/game. Defensive holding was third with 281 times for 1,134 yds and 3.44 yds/game. The only penalty that's anywhere near holding is false starts, which will be called correctly most of the time. In 2021 it was even worse, offensive holding was called 649 times for 6,297 yds resulting in an average of 23.15 yds/game. It was 75 more times than false starts, which was number 2.Then get rid of holding all together is that's what you're mad about. Take a defensive lineman to the ground and just hold him there. Wide receiver makes a cut, just tackle him, who cares right? Holding is ruining your game so it has to go. After all everyone does it .
Breakdowns on kick coverage, breakdowns in the secondary in goal line situations, fumbling the ball in key situations, that's what ruins games and influences outcomes.
Anything even hinting at rigging a game on such a level to me, is completely ridiculous. Again, it was a penalty and it was called correctly in my opinion and crucial situation has nothing to do with it.It's called way too frequently and way too inconsistently. Throughout the season, offensive holding was the most frequent penalty called at 581 times for 5,579 yds averaging 16.91 yds/game. Defensive holding was third with 281 times for 1,134 yds and 3.44 yds/game. The only penalty that's anywhere near holding is false starts, which will be called correctly most of the time. In 2021 it was even worse, offensive holding was called 649 times for 6,297 yds resulting in an average of 23.15 yds/game. It was 75 more times than false starts, which was number 2.
The NFL needs to look at what really is holding and what is just playing defense. Bradberry's hold was holding by definition since he held the jersey, but it was for a brief moment and Smith-Schuster still managed to get separation from him. Those sorts of plays were happening all game with no calls for both sides. Suddenly calling it when it's happened all game in such a crucial situation is suspect at best and flat-out rigging the game at worse.
Honestly, I didn't care who won the game, so I'm not upset the Chiefs won. I'm bored with the Chiefs, but I don't hate them or anything. I just hate the officiating in the NFL because it's been terrible all year.
Is there different rules over holding before/after a throw?The NFL needs to look at what really is holding and what is just playing defense. Bradberry's hold was holding by definition since he held the jersey, but it was for a brief moment and Smith-Schuster still managed to get separation from him. Those sorts of plays were happening all game with no calls for both sides. Suddenly calling it when it's happened all game in such a crucial situation is suspect at best and flat-out rigging the game at worse.
Per the NFL rule book, it doesn't look like it.Is there different rules over holding before/after a throw?
Seems to me it would be easier to enforce a post-throw hold over a pre-throw hold as the referee team would have a better idea of which defensive team members to focus on.
They didn't overturn the call on that challenge from the chiefs and they absolutely should have. If you wanted to throw the games for the chiefs, that would have been a good opportunity - was effectively a turnover.The NFL wants the Chiefs to be the dominant team so bad that the officiating was as lopsided as it's been all playoffs.
It turns out that pregnant women can actually have sex, and some people find them sexy. So I'm not sure why you assume that a pregnant performer can't or shouldn't be sexual in their performance.I had a laugh at her being obviously pregnant while trying to sell sex with her silly songs and dance moves.