Let's see how it's going:So far you've had a new manager who'll come in and stop the rot every 2.5 years, and a billion pounds (a literally billion actual pounds) spent in nine summers (just summers) on an average of four new players at a time. What you have to show for it is a Community Shield, an FA Cup, and a Europa League, and crushing embarrassment.
And you're doing the exact same thing again this summer - and you think this will work this time?
There wasn't a single good cross or corner in that match. It was absolute dross from both sides.There's watching paint dry and there's watching Man Utd. I'm not sure which is the best time to spend.
Because he's a very good manager? If the Chelsea board had any ball knowledge then he'd still be there.How on earth does this man keep getting jobs?
The latter absolutely isn't a problem at all for me. He's a brilliant coach, I like his style, I like him as a person and he's phenomenal at knockout football.So England are going all out to win that major tournament then, they got the best available manager and he isn't English, but I don't think the latter is a massive problem to be honest.
He's a very good tactician, I don't know about manager - he falls out with players and dressing rooms rather easily but maybe the infrequency of international management squad camps compared to daily club training will help him... ...or the players will dread seeing this tyrant every six weeks.Because he's a very good manager?
They just... don't learn.
No, it's the same pattern:More insight, please. Is it your opinion that they should have stuck with Ten Hag?