Sorry but Nissan gathering endurance race data and experience is like a complete greenhorn competing in a strongmen competition, lifting the heaviest weight in the most uncommon way, utterly failing and getting his skull crushed in the process. Then in the intensive care station he tells everyone he is so happy about all the data and experience and that everything went as expected.To us, they may have nothing to show for it, but to them they have 24 hours of data and experience that they can use to make the car better. And that's all that matters at this point.
To us, they may have nothing to show for it, but to them they have 24 hours of data and experience that they can use to make the car better. And that's all that matters at this point.
It gives alot of track information as well, keep in mind LeMans is a street circuit mostly and the only time they touch the track is in june.I still have significant doubts over how much useful data Nissan could have collected about the car. Missing such a fundamental aspect of the car (half it's power and drivetrain) had knock on effects such as a different weight balance, different suspension load, different brake load, different tyre pressures and they even had to change from the custom tyres and wheels that were designed and built for the car. With everything so far removed from the cars design specs there wont be much data that's relevant.
Getting the drivers and team as a whole familiar with working together and experience in the race is vital and will on it's own bring massive performance gains but other then that? Seems a waste of fuel and brake material.
You have to think of their timescale - a large part of the team will never have done a Le Mans as part of a P1 team before. If you're aiming to win next year, time is against you completely - you have just one year for the entire team to be bulletproof. Letting up the one opportunity you're given to have the most realistic 24 hour race run possible would be extremely unprofessional of NISMO.I still have significant doubts over how much useful data Nissan could have collected about the car. Missing such a fundamental aspect of the car (half it's power and drivetrain) had knock on effects such as a different weight balance, different suspension load, different brake load, different tyre pressures and they even had to change from the custom tyres and wheels that were designed and built for the car. With everything so far removed from the cars design specs there wont be much data that's relevant.
Getting the drivers and team as a whole familiar with working together and experience in the race is vital and will on it's own bring massive performance gains but other then that? Seems a waste of fuel and brake material.
Yeah, the head of the field as they get lapped by the field.I have to give thanks to Foxtel. The last time I watched a Le Mans race almost in its entirety was when Speed Channel broadcast years back. I was struck by the closing speeds and the surgical precision of the LMP drivers through the esses when passing. This series has made me put F1 on the back burner.
Nissan are looking at winning the big races. They're happy to race sprints and 300km races but, they want the world class big races. Porsche pretty much won on sheer speed. When Nissan get the HY system working in full effect, Godzilla will be stomping through France at the head of the field.
He qualified 17th and finsihed 9th, out of 12. I wouldn't say that was competitive.A key difference was that when Brabham ran Indy there was obvious potential with the concept - he was competitive even when the engine was giving away 170HP to the rest of the field. Nissan have a lot to prove.
I agree about the car needing the hybrid power to the rear wheels, but until the car is running in that configuration they will not be competitive and the data they gather will be somewhat useless even if they do get an hybrid system running on the front wheels.But the GTR-LM is also giving away power, and drive, that it will have next year. Despite that, it was pretty much keeping up with the other LMP1s on the straights, and only losing out on corner exit (which will be help by hybrid power to the rear) and on braking (which will also be helped by the hybrid harvesting power.)
Anyway, there was an entire 24hr race that happened without Datsuns, moving on...
Was a great race, as usual, though I do believe the pit building is in need of a drastic update, specially to cater for 3 car teams, I think that all garages should be able to cater for 3 cars inside and pose as 2 cars simultaneously parallel in front of the garage in the lane itself, I also believe the building needs to be extended and cater for 70+ cars, and the lane exit needs to be moved to come out prior to the Dunlop bridge past the chicane, with the price caps coming into play for the future and the potential for LMP3 cars 5 odd years down the track the field can grow,
Besides that, the announcements made regarding manufacturers and class regulations for the future are making this quite an exciting prospect in years to come, and hopefully the event can get itself back to the status it once had a long time ago,
Anyway, there was an entire 24hr race that happened without Datsuns, moving on...
Marketing exercise successful!
Well, it would look bad if they didn't congratulate their VAG partner on their win. Audi is too classy to be poor sports.Field is growing to 57 next year and 60 the year after with pit overhauls.
Translation I am told for this is "Porsche Win The Race, You Have Our Respect"
Say what you want about Audi, but that is a classy gesture.
Unreliable?As a motoring and motor racing enthusiast I am aware of the manufacturer Nissan, no amount of advertising "innovation" exercises with millions of dollars invested will ever get me to purchase anything so overpriced, dreadful, boring, uncomfortable, unreliable and as unsafe as anything they have or have had in their range of vehicles for some time, about the only thing Nissan related I would purchase with my own money is anything Datsun, 120Y, 180B, Stanza etc, probably the most unsafe cars other then the Ford Pinto released to the world, but for under $400 AUD they are brilliant fun in a paddock,
Listen to the car coming out of the corners. It sounds like it's going to vomit out a piston. No wonder it was so slow.
Unreliable?
I don't like Nissan that much either as I find their products to be bland and outdated outside the GT-R, but they have a strong reputation for reliability tbh.
Data is never useless. Data about brake longevity and heat issues. Data about engine durability, fuel consumption, heat, changes over race distance and long stints. Data about tire longevity (which should actually improve once the hybrid system balances it out)... all of this can be carried forward.
It's a big loss that they don't have hybrid data, but whatever else they gather is nowhere near useless.
I don't think they needed to sandbag to be the slowest LMP1.Here's something to consider, that Nissan is sandbagging.
After this years LM they are doing the BOP for the remaining 12 months. So we have seen the speed of Porsche and Audi so if they are deemed to be too fast then they will be pegged back in line with Toyota.
As Nissan didn't do much bar turn up they might not get looked at too much in relation to bop.
Yes actually it will be useless. Not a single piece of data you mentioned will transfer over to the car when running in it's as designed specs, it will be too radically different to what they ran this year. I really don't see how this is so hard for people to see.
Here's something to consider, that Nissan is sandbagging.
After this years LM they are doing the BOP for the remaining 12 months. So we have seen the speed of Porsche and Audi so if they are deemed to be too fast then they will be pegged back in line with Toyota.
As Nissan didn't do much bar turn up they might not get looked at too much in relation to bop.
No actually it will not. You still have a LMP with 4 wheels, a cockpit, and the track data, temperature, wear, bumps etc won't be changed.