Jason~BourneAwesome!!! I love the Audi R8 [just watched Lehto win at Road Atlanta]. Im just wondering, if you include the GT40, wouldn't you want to include the new GT?, the C5R and GTS-R? They should run laps as fast as the GT40, or is this just a LMP thread? If so, please make a GTS class list. Anyways, thanks for the info, its very useful.
kennythebombWell, today is my test of your information now Zardoz
I'm doing the 24hrs of lemans 2 right now with my XJR9, my best car out of all the ones you tested without many miles on it (My minolta has over 3,000.)
It's in the lead on lap 5
I have to say, you're spot on with these two points. Why is the 88C-V (or the Minolta as everyone seems to call it) among the best LM cars in GT4? I couldn't understand it either. And I agree, the Sauber was indeed hyped up and still is. I think it's just because it's hard to acquire.ZardozMinolta Toyota 88C-V -
Seemingly glued to the track in A-Spec, this car is unrealistically fast. It should not be the fastest of the Group C cars, but the developers made it so, at least in A-Spec. In B-Spec, though, its a different story.
Sauber Mercedes C9 -
When we were all awaiting the release of the game, the Sauber attained a sort of mystical aura, and the word was that it would be the fastest car in the game. It isn't, but its close.
FormulaGTI used the Plyaystation 2 Pesky. it's a damn good car, but i think you may have gotten the '03 model confused with '04 because the tire wear with R2/R3 is quite bad (lasting only 5 laps).
Also, has anyone been severely affected by the drive-into-the-wall-on-the-straight glitch? I know i was...like once every 2 laps!
ZardozGreat! Let us know how your Bob does with the Jag. What are his stats?
.
kennythebombI won yesterday on lap 443.
His stats are 8245, 96, 82 and 81.
ZardozThat's exactly the number of laps my 4-hour test extrapolated out to for 24 hours!
Your Bob has much better stats than mine, yet they apparently got the Jag around equally as well. I wonder what the significance of that is?
ZardozLooks like you reversed the tires. You should have had an R3/R2 combo, with the Mediums on the front, not the rear. Five laps with Mediums on the rear is about right for the '04 Playstation car.
In my test the '03 Courage car went seven laps on R3/R3. The '04 Playstation car, with more power, had to have R3/R2 to go seven.
Your experience with the drive-into-the-wall glitch is the worst I've heard of. With me, it happened on the first lap with the '04 Pesky, so I re-started the race, and I never saw it happen again.
.
ZardozIf you're planning on running one of these 24-hour races as a co-driver with your B-Spec pilot, keep this in mind: Cars in GT4 wear out pretty quickly...
Group C FanaticI have to say, you're spot on with these two points. Why is the 88C-V (or the Minolta as everyone seems to call it) among the best LM cars in GT4? I couldn't understand it either. And I agree, the Sauber was indeed hyped up and still is. I think it's just because it's hard to acquire.
Anyway, great write up, will come in useful. Great to see so many LM fans on GTP.
ZardozThey all had their transmissions adjusted with the old "tranny trick": Final was slid full right to 5.000 (or 5.500), the Autoset was slid right to 25, then back full left to 1 and left there. The Final was then adjusted for the long, long Sarth II Mulsanne straight so that the red rev-limiter light flashed at the end.
I did some preliminary testing to get the correct final drive gear ratio and the best tire combination for each car. Almost all the cars had to pit for fuel at 7 laps, so I picked tire combos that would last that long.
What is the "tranny trick"? and what does it do?
VyPeRYes, much agreed. In GT3, It was the R390, 787B, or the GT1 that was always the dominant cars in racing. Is PD showing favoritism?
The Sauber C9 was one of the fastest cars ever to compete in the Lemans 24hr. race. It hit almost up to 240 mph on the Mulsanne straight, also winning the race in '89.
Your post's are always looking so energetic!Old GeezerWOW!!!
"Outstanding" work Zardoz!!!
THANX for all your effort! đź‘Ť ...O.G.
live4speedVery nice writeup, however you did something I would think you'd have been better off not doing. Thats the extra rigidity, I'm not 100% sure if it will slow down your lap times, but on all the LMP, GT1 and group C cars I did it to became harder to control and more prone to spinning which may be part of the reason your B-Spec driver couldn't control the Vertigo and GT40.
njesperExcuse me, if this has been answered in another post (have checked but couldnt find it)
1. Could you specify the result of this wear and tear? How does it make your car weaker? do you loose horsepower and/or does the car skid more/feel heavier?
2. Is there a cure for a car, that has been worn out? or do you have to sell it, and buy a new one?
3. What about oil change? If you change the oil before the endurance race, does anybody know how much time into the race, the oil reaches its worst again?
Hope somebody wants to help out yet another gt4 fanatic, who could probably find all the answers on page 32 in three different threads
Best regards,
Jesper
-Denmark-
Zardoz1. The handling of the car becomes erratic and unpredictable. It will wander around on the straight, and be generally more difficult to control.
2. There is indeed a cure. In the tune shop for the car, in the "Other" section, is the Rigidity Refresher Plan. It restores the car to as-new condition. It does not last, however, and should be re-applied whenever it becomes available again (check-mark disappears). I've seen this happen in as little as 400 miles on some cars, and some say that rough driving, with lots of collisions, hastens its availability.
3. No data on this, but it does have an effect. You'll note a drop in power as the race progresses. Always change the oil and buy the RRP after a long race.