Thank you very much!Yeah, that JPS style Porsche is easily the standout car for me as well. Great sets Nico_Ble99.
Couldn't agree more. Worst track in the UK for spectators in my opinion, overpriced and absolutely soulless.but Jesus do I hate Silverstone ... literally couldn't bring myself to go
Yup, I'd pretty much agree. That's not to say other venues are perfect, and I understand safety acts as impetus for some decisions, but as the UK's 'flagship' circuit, the experience it offers is nowhere near good enough. I'd literally rather go anywhere else - I'm local to Silverstone, it's a shame Knockhill is so far away!Couldn't agree more. Worst track in the UK for spectators in my opinion, overpriced and absolutely soulless.
Castle Combe for the win for photographers, you can walk around the entire circuit, loads of spots you can photograph from that look over the catch-fencing and the most open paddock of any circuit I've been to. Well worth a trip with a camera or six.Yup, I'd pretty much agree. That's not to say other venues are perfect, and I understand safety acts as impetus for some decisions, but as the UK's 'flagship' circuit, the experience it offers is nowhere near good enough. I'd literally rather go anywhere else - I'm local to Silverstone, it's a shame Knockhill is so far away!
Silverstone can't really get much worse for amateur photographers than it already was, mostly because of catch fences - which is just unavoidable as an F1 venue, but with more and more fences creeping in at MSV circuits, it really does suck the fun out of the experience, especially when you're having to perch yourself atop other fences, in the rain, to try and get a clean shot. They've recently removed some of the photographers windows in the fences at Silverstone too.
Lydden Hill tops Castle Combe for me; waist high fence for 95% of the circuit and a short distance between the spectator areas and the track. There is a small section closed off at the moment (for tree felling), otherwise you can get around the whole thing.Castle Combe for the win for photographers, you can walk around the entire circuit, loads of spots you can photograph from that look over the catch-fencing and the most open paddock of any circuit I've been to. Well worth a trip with a camera or six.
Surely if you've got creds fencing doesn't matter anyway?Reading all that really makes me want to travel to the UK for a race or two in the near future. But I'd need to know before hand which series won't require a press card or letter of intent.
In like "You've got good creds, here is your accreditation" or just turning up to a race and shooting through the spectator fencing?Surely if you've got creds fencing doesn't matter anyway?
Sorry, I've confused myself with what I said, I'd misread what you wrote. Off the back of what we were talking about I thought you'd be behind the fence anyway. Not sure about getting accreditation here, there's obviously different ways of going about it, I'd imagine it's all very similar to over there.In like "You've got good creds, here is your accreditation" or just turning up to a race and shooting through the spectator fencing?
Oulton Park for me. Since they closed off Stirlings and chucked all the catch fencing up on the GP loop at Brands I haven't actually been back.Brands Hatch was great, but they are slowly ruining all the best spots. Still the best of the MSV circuits for spectator photography in my opinion
Cadwell is pretty good, as with Oulton, the topography really helps. Snetterton is still very open, but as with Silverstone, the backdrops are generally pretty dull.I really want to try Cadwell, as I have seen a few great shots from there.
No worries. ^^Sorry, I've confused myself with what I said, I'd misread what you wrote. Off the back of what we were talking about I thought you'd be behind the fence anyway. Not sure about getting accreditation here, there's obviously different ways of going about it, I'd imagine it's all very similar to over there.
Shooting through the fence is always an option though, it's what 99% of the people trackside end up doing, there's just better places to do it than others.
Just followed you Flickr by the way.
Ha, fair enough. I'm stuck in limbo where I hate being a slave to the viewfinder at events, instead of just enjoying them, and sucking as a hobbyist photographer and wanting to be better!I never wanna do it another way. I'm that passionate about the hobby I do, I guess.
Feel 'ya. 😁Ha, fair enough. I'm stuck in limbo where I hate being a slave to the viewfinder at events, instead of just enjoying them, and sucking as a hobbyist photographer and wanting to be better!
In my (very limited) experience, getting accreditation in Europe has been much less hassle than in the UK. I have only shot rallycross in Europe, but just a few circuits have asked to see public liability insurance. Every tarmac circuit I have shot at in the UK has wanted to see PLI, some up to the value of £5 million.Sorry, I've confused myself with what I said, I'd misread what you wrote. Off the back of what we were talking about I thought you'd be behind the fence anyway. Not sure about getting accreditation here, there's obviously different ways of going about it, I'd imagine it's all very similar to over there.
Don't blame you. I still love the circuit, but it irks me every time I walk around the GP loop seeing how much they have ruined it for spectators, especially those with a camera. All for a series that didn't come back again .Oulton Park for me. Since they closed off Stirlings and chucked all the catch fencing up on the GP loop at Brands I haven't actually been back.
@Nico_Ble99, this seems a relevant consideration.Every tarmac circuit I have shot at in the UK has wanted to see PLI, some up to the value of £5 million.
I have never shot trackside at an MSV circuit: tried to get accredited for an event (at Brands Hatch) a few years ago and the application process was so convoluted that I gave up and just shot from the spectator areas.
I've been offered creds twice by people already with access, I've taken neither up on the offer because it's not a situation I wanted to go into half-assed feeling like I wasn't supposed to be there.I have never shot trackside at an MSV circuit: tried to get accredited for an event (at Brands Hatch) a few years ago and the application process was so convoluted that I gave up and just shot from the spectator areas.
I do like Brands and I will go back, it's just so frustrating. I'd say we are past peak amateur race photography in the UK, though I suspect it won't be long before some casual in flip flops is taking better photos than me on their phone 'cus it's got AI fence removal!Don't blame you. I still love the circuit, but it irks me every time I walk around the GP loop seeing how much they have ruined it for spectators, especially those with a camera. All for a series that didn't come back again .
I haven't looked at the MSV media process for a while now, so it may have changed; I suspect it likely has as, when I was looking at accreditation, evidence of print media was a big part of it. That seems less relevant these days.@Nico_Ble99, this seems a relevant consideration.
"half-assed feeling like I wasn't supposed to be there" is a pretty good summary of the time I have spent trackside. My first opportunity to go trackside came as a prize to a photography competition; it is a long tale, but everything that has happened since has really been a consequence of that. I was just an enthusiastic spectator with a camera then and I still feel the same now!I've been offered creds twice by people already with access, I've taken neither up on the offer because it's not a situation I wanted to go into half-assed feeling like I wasn't supposed to be there.
My view on this is very old fashioned, as my personal preference is to avoid any post-processing if possible (as I feel like I am cheating to get a photo!). The use of AI is like another level on this to me!I do like Brands and I will go back, it's just so frustrating. I'd say we are past peak amateur race photography in the UK, though I suspect it won't be long before some casual in flip flops is taking better photos then me on their phone 'cus it's go AI fence removal!
It does indeed. I did it during the WEC race at Spa last year and it turned out fairly well, I think I have posted a picture of the Glickenhaus hypercar blasting down the old start/finish straight here from that day.@Nico_Ble99, this seems a relevant consideration.
Over the last two years, I have picked out my races / series I'll apply for media accreditation. For me, it's the Creventic 24H Series, International GT Open, NASCAR Whelen Euro Series and (I never thought it would be possible as an amateur motorsports photographer but here we are, hah) MotoGP. Track-wise, it's usually either Spa, Zolder or Assen. Though, I have applied for accreditation when the NWES returns to oval racing @ Raceway Venray in June as well. Creventic, GT Sport (Int'l GT Open host) and even NASCAR are very "open" when it comes to handing out credentials. A press card can be provided during the application process, however it's not necessary to have one to get accredited. I have tried applying for VLN (now NLS) and ADAC GT Masters once, but Germany bureaucracy is at it's peak when it comes to series hosted in Germany or races at German race tracks in general. Without a press card and letter of intent, you're getting nowhere. And don't forget your outreach on the web and your socials. Even when I applied for the NWES round in Oschersleben last year, I still needed to be accredited by the race track, despite being granted permission from NWES media officials themselves. But do let me know if you want to know how I got MotoGP credentials. The story is quite interesting.In my (very limited) experience, getting accreditation in Europe has been much less hassle than in the UK. I have only shot rallycross in Europe, but just a few circuits have asked to see public liability insurance. Every tarmac circuit I have shot at in the UK has wanted to see PLI, some up to the value of £5 million.
I have never shot trackside at an MSV circuit: tried to get accredited for an event (at Brands Hatch) a few years ago and the application process was so convoluted that I gave up and just shot from the spectator areas.
That's exactly the way I feel about it as well. Sure, I'd really like it if all that leads me to some great opportunity one day. But even if that will never happen, it's a privilege to just be there, do what I'm passionate about among utter professionals and make myself a better photographer every time by trying different angles, techniques or simply by being inspired by some well-known motorsport photographers and then trying to get as close as possible to even remotely recreating a picture the guy has taken once. Of course, while still being the car-nut that I (or we) are and enjoying the sights, sounds and excitement motorsport brings to us.If you get the chance, then I would urge you to say yes and see where it leads you. It is meaningless really, but I get a massive kick being able to stand alongside the professional photographers and journalists who I respect the hell out of and being able to peep behind the curtain of the motorsport I love.
It was also a (possibly) once-in-a-lifetime event in Alabama and my neighbors saw it around 9-10pm. After a long week at work, we were zonked out by 8pm, but the following nights offered no aurora lights. My better half has been more upset about this than me, which is also rare.Also side note, I am PISSED that I missed the solar flare event from last Friday. I was so tired from work I slept from 6 PM til 5 AM the next morning. I wake up to a news article that says we can expect aurora lights in the southern regions of Ontario due to this solar flare and it said they will occur Friday and Saturday. I thought okay I had time to still see it that night and NOTHING.
Damn you work exhaustion and CBC news!!
Yep, exactly this. I have definitely improved by looking at what the professionals are doing and trying to get similar results myself. Been a few (rare!) occasions where I have managed to achieve something similar and that has been immensely satisfying.That's exactly the way I feel about it as well. Sure, I'd really like it if all that leads me to some great opportunity one day. But even if that will never happen, it's a privilege to just be there, do what I'm passionate about among utter professionals and make myself a better photographer every time by trying different angles, techniques or simply by being inspired by some well-known motorsport photographers and then trying to get as close as possible to even remotely recreating a picture the guy has taken once. Of course, while still being the car-nut that I (or we) are and enjoying the sights, sounds and excitement motorsport brings to us.
Indeed! For example, I always wanted to mimick pictures like this at Spa:Yep, exactly this. I have definitely improved by looking at what the professionals are doing and trying to get similar results myself. Been a few (rare!) occasions where I have managed to achieve something similar and that has been immensely satisfying.
I'll never forget the feeling when I first stood on the inside of La Source, leaning on that wall and a R8 LMS GT3 went by with just inches to spare. I almost flinched and thought "That's the s**t!" or whenI think the "sights and sounds" part of what you said is especially relevant to me; racing and racing cars are that little bit cooler when you have the chance to experience them up close!
Power steering failed and the driver (some Italian bloke called Rossi) couldn't quite muscle the car round the corner: pretty fortunate he didn't end up stuck in the gravel trap.That was an expensive mistake in the BMW!
Most of the GT3 cars sound great at any distance, but they must sound absolutely savage that close. The AMG especially, such a deep engine note.I'll never forget the feeling when I first stood on the inside of La Source, leaning on that wall and a R8 LMS GT3 went by with just inches to spare. I almost flinched and thought "That's the s**t!" or when
an AMG GT3 fired up the engine for quali on pit road and did a hard launch with me standing just one or two meters next to it.
Flexing all your cameras there! Those night shots are cool, love seeing the details like brakes and exhaust that you don't get to see during the daylight hours.Finally got around to uploading some resized pics from the 12 Hours of Sebring. Pics were taken with 3 different cameras lol...
They absolutely do. The NASCAR Whelen Euro Series cars are incredible as well. They might not rev as high as the US cars ( they are limited to around 7000 rpm I believe), but man do they make you shake when they're given the beans right next to you. Last year at the season finale @ Ciruit Zolder I stood at the pit exit, right at the line where the pit limiter gets deactivated.And since the exhaust on these cars is located on the right side of the car, me and another photographer who was standing there with me knew what was coming up. The car crossed the line on a damp track and just smashed the throttle. The look on our faces spoke for itself.Most of the GT3 cars sound great at any distance, but they must sound absolutely savage that close. The AMG especially, such a deep engine note.
That must be one hell of a sight (and feeling) as well. And nice shot, too!Lydden Hill is the standout for me; the island in the center of Lydden puts you on a bank with the apex of the corner at your feet. The best drivers come into the corner sideways and pass under your nose.
Peugeot 208 4x4 T16 (GB1) (Patrick O'Donovan) by Steve White, on Flickr
I always make a point of visiting the same spot every time I am trackside at Lydden and it never, ever, gets old.