I find it hilarious that you always use Toronto as a good example of multiculturalism, yet you always fail to mention the majority of the population have either a Western European or Canadian ethnic background, countries that hardly have a major problem with poverty or crime, so it's not surprising that Toronto is the same. Instead you mostly mention the smallest minorities in Toronto that you seem to feel will make your argument more valid if they're the only ones mentioned because it gives the impression that they make up the majority. At least Carb is only posting non factual articles as evidence because he hasn't done any fact checking, you're purposely (or at least I fail to see how it's accidental) presenting misleading half truths and failing to mention all the facts to try and win an argument.
I find it hilarious you're trying to fact check me when the stats don't back you up here either.
Literally half the people in Toronto weren't born in Canada. That's not misleading, that's not a made up fact, literally
1 in 2 people you meet in Toronto are not born Canadians. That's not even ancestry, 1 in 2 people in Toronto have moved to Canada from another country during their life. As for your idea that "most" of the people in Toronto are European/"Canadian" background, you're right. By
one percent. 49% of the people in Toronto are visible minorities, which means a non-white, non-European background. Forgive me for calling a city multicultural when only 49% of people there aren't white. Sorry for being "misleading" by mentioning visible minorities in a city that's
only 49% visible minorities. I guess I should have mentioned Brampton (33% white), or Vancouver (47% white) if I was being "honest".
Comparing that to London's 71.5% white population, or the 78% French nationals in Paris, or the 82% European ethnicity in Berlin, you can see that a 51% white population in a large western city isn't exactly common. The fact remains there's significant numbers of all of those ethnic groups I mentioned as well as Toronto having the highest concentration of muslims of any city in North America. I'm not just making this stuff up. If we want to talk about misleading truths saying the "majority" of the population have a European background is pretty misleading when the number is actually 51%.
Of course a country that was founded as British and French colonies will still have a lot of white people. That there's still white people in Toronto doesn't take anything away from what I've said. There's nearly 600,000 muslims in Toronto, that's quite a lot of them but somehow we've not all succumbed to Sharia law.
Yeah I know you were replying to Carbonox. I was asking for your opinion on those two subjects since you happen to bring them up. So that's a 'yes' then. I have found my opponent. I shall be summoning you to a debate soon.
(And I am honestly, extremely intrigued at how your city makes it 'work', but don't answer that. I'll ask you in another place.)
I said I didn't think there's an inherent problem with either, not that they're all perfect in their implementation across the Earth. There's no "debate" to have here unless you're going to tell me that people of multiple cultures inherently leads to problems, or that muslims inherently cause problems. If that's your position then I'm not having a debate with you.
As an aside, I find it pretty funny that in the gun, god, or discussions about black crime/policing online there's a big circlejerk about how much more progressive Europe is. Then when it comes to Islam you get Europeans who are so smug about what Bubba thinks about his AR-15, bible, and black people talking about how dangerous Islam and multicultural cities are. I see stuff said online by Europeans about muslims or Roma people ("gypsies") that they'd be frothing with rage if an American said them about a gay or a black person.