- 29,791
- Bratvegas
- GTP_Liquid
True.
Bush did 9/11.
There was also the 1993 WTC bombing which happened maybe a year before Giuliani became the Mayor Of New York.
Funny, well not really, how the headline fails to include what Giuliani actually said in order to purposely distort his position. You don't read the article you quote and go on discussing things that happened more than 20 years ago which bear no relevance to what Giuliani said either.
If you give him a little leeway for rounding and poor grammar, he's obviously talking about the 2001-2009 period from 9/11 to Obama's inauguration. How many successful Islamic terror attacks were there in that period? What's the conspiracy theory here?“Under those eight years, before Obama came along, we didn’t have any successful radical Islamic terrorist attack inside the United States,”
If you give him a little leeway for rounding and poor grammar, he's obviously talking about the 2001-2009 period from 9/11 to Obama's inauguration.
What's the conspiracy theory here?
So your assumption is he forgot about 9/11. Makes sense.And leeway he shall not have. Poor grammar means comic effect.
None. People find it amusing that dodgy syntax leads to something mildly amusing. It's happened with politicians since time immemorial.
But it very much is.Yes, probably because it's not irony.
Maybe under the Alanis Morissette definition of irony, but not under the actual definition of irony. At the moment, you could accuse the United States of hypocrisy, but there's a distinct difference between what China is doing and what America has going in Cuba. But no irony.But it very much is.
There is a difference obviously but from anyone apart from their own national view its a land grab all the same.Maybe under the Alanis Morissette definition of irony, but not under the actual definition of irony. At the moment, you could accuse the United States of hypocrisy, but there's a distinct difference between what China is doing and what America has going in Cuba. But no irony.
No, not at all.There is a difference obviously but from anyone apart from their own national view its a land grab all the same.
You probably are. Especially since the cases aren't at all similar. Besides, as @prisonermonkey points out, Guantanamo wasn't stolen in the first place.Am I the only one that finds Americas hostility to Chinese claims in the South China Sea ironic whilst they hold a stolen part of Cuba in the form of Guantanamo.
Wow american colleges are failing miserably for getting people ready for the outside world.
Wow american colleges are failing miserably for getting people ready for the outside world.
The only reason i used RT was because i was reading another article and this came up as a Live article, its on every media outlet out there.Has suing other nations ever been successful?
RT is pro-Russian-agenda website, expect loaded information for next 20 miles.
Presumably the official answer is that Iraqi WMD victims should petition their own government to create their own equivalent of the JASTA act so that Iraqi lawyers can also get in on some of this action. Indeed as the White House claims, the US act may open up US diplomats and servicemen to litigation in other countries.I find this news kinda funny
http://www.news.com.au/finance/econ...s/news-story/db5526a86ed43a1d6325d0c0a829e8f2
Yes the 9/11 attacks are not funny, but the fact that American victims can sue Saudi Arabia seems amusing to me.
Can the Iraqi victims sue America over the wrongful deaths of all those civilians killed by a war that over claimed WMDs or from ISIS which was born from said war?
No