- 20,681
- TenEightyOne
- TenEightyOne
Oh dear. Say it isn't so.
Surely Sunday morning's okay... even if it looks like the world's worst ventriloquist act?
Oh dear. Say it isn't so.
It's kinda fun having the Freedom Caucus going off the Republican reservation. The Don is obviously trying to flip Rand to his cause. But yeah, I hope it's not gonna be quite that easy.Surely Sunday morning's okay... even if it looks like the world's worst ventriloquist act?
I for one am glad to see this. Dr. Rand Paul has some of the best ideas for healthcare reform I have heard.It's kinda fun having the Freedom Caucus going off the Republican reservation. The Don is obviously trying to flip Rand to his cause. But yeah, I hope it's not gonna be quite that easy.
Dr. Rand Paul has some of the best ideas for healthcare reform I have heard.
So Susan Rice is the 'alleged unmasker'. After her role in the debacle in Benghazi in which she peddled lies about the now debunked story of an organic "protest" (that lead to the sacking of the US Embassy), should I really be surprised? Probably not, but somehow, I still am. I am no longer buying that this surveillance was "incidental". This needs to be completely investigated and if laws were broken, people need to go to jail.
Not illegal at all, doing her job protecting America from it's enemies- foreign and domestic. http://www.businessinsider.com/susan-rice-trump-unmask-intelligence-wiretap-2017-4There are two angles to that: if Rice is the Unmasker-General then has she broken the law against the public interest and, secondly, is the released information pertinent to pursuing investigation of further criminal matters in the part of the people the Unmasker has named?
Shenanigans in the release of accurate information doesn't make that information less valid.
Do you have a link to the evidence that suggest that her motivations were entirely in the defense of American against it's enemies?Not illegal at all, doing her job protecting America from it's enemies- foreign and domestic. http://www.businessinsider.com/susan-rice-trump-unmask-intelligence-wiretap-2017-4
Meanwhile in the swamp
Not illegal at all, doing her job protecting America from it's enemies- foreign and domestic. http://www.businessinsider.com/susan-rice-trump-unmask-intelligence-wiretap-2017-4
Meanwhile in the swamp
Motive doesn't excuse the fact that she leaked information, some of it possibly classified, to the press. Need I remind you that Edward Snowden is still wanted for the US for possible treason charges for leaking PRISM information to the public? The Snowden leaks were in the public interest, so why does Ms. Rice get a pass and Snowden gets the firing squad? Is it because that Ms. Rice is actually helping out her progressive friends in the Democrat party and in the media by getting this information out there? You need to remember that Ms. Rice is no longer the ambassador to the UN, so she shouldn't even be able to sit in on those meetings in the first place.Not illegal at all, doing her job protecting America from it's enemies- foreign and domestic. http://www.businessinsider.com/susan-rice-trump-unmask-intelligence-wiretap-2017-4
Ms. Rice is no longer the ambassador to the UN, so she shouldn't even be able to sit in on those meetings in the first place.
The Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs (APNSA), commonly referred to as the National Security Advisor or at times informally termed the NSC advisor,[1][2] is a senior aide in the Executive Office of the President, based at the West Wing of the White House, who serves as the chief in-house advisor to the President of the United States on national security issues.
In other words she bugged the Trump team for Obama. It's dangerously close to Watergate, people.
Motive doesn't excuse the fact that she leaked information, some of it possibly classified, to the press. Need I remind you that Edward Snowden is still wanted for the US for possible treason charges for leaking PRISM information to the public? The Snowden leaks were in the public interest, so why does Ms. Rice get a pass and Snowden gets the firing squad?
Nope, I'm not a mind reader. I'll just assume she wasnt a paid foreign agent like her Trump admin. replacement was.Do you have a link to the evidence that suggest that her motivations were entirely in the defense of American against it's enemies?
An amazing coincidence huh.PS, I had no idea Betsy DeVos is his sister, talk about a strange connection
She did? Link pleaseMotive doesn't excuse the fact that she leaked information, some of it possibly classified, to the press.
I'm not familiar with the bill but I have seen him interviewed several times. I like what he has to say about associative healthcare group insurance. Imagine, if say, the NRA were allowed to sell it's members group insurance, they could offer no copays for accidental gunshot wounds.Are you referring to Senate bill 222? Which parts of it in particular are the "best ideas?"
Curious that you claimed to know that she was just "doing her job", inferring that nothing nefarious was afoot, seeing as you're not a mind reader.Nope, I'm not a mind reader. I'll just assume she wasnt a paid foreign agent like her Trump admin. replacement was.
Simple: cast Alec Baldwin.I'm thinking they are going to quietly cancel the next season of House of Cards - how can it possibly compete with this?
Associative groups would keep prices low and solve the problem of pre existing conditions.
Former US Attorney: Susan Rice Ordered Spy Agencies To Produce ‘Detailed Spreadsheets’ Involving Trump
RICHARD POLLOCK
Reporter
Former President Barack Obama’s national security adviser Susan Rice ordered U.S. spy agencies to produce “detailed spreadsheets” of legal phone calls involving Donald Trump and his aides when he was running for president, according to former U.S. Attorney Joseph diGenova.
“What was produced by the intelligence community at the request of Ms. Rice were detailed spreadsheets of intercepted phone calls with unmasked Trump associates in perfectly legal conversations with individuals,” diGenova told The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group Monday.
“The overheard conversations involved no illegal activity by anybody of the Trump associates, or anyone they were speaking with,” diGenova said. “In short, the only apparent illegal activity was the unmasking of the people in the calls.”
Other official sources with direct knowledge and who requested anonymity confirmed to TheDCNF diGenova’s description of surveillance reports Rice ordered one year before the 2016 presidential election.
“We’re looking at a potential constitutional crisis from the standpoint that we used an extremely strong capability that’s supposed to be used to safeguard and protect the country,” he said. “And we used it for political purposes by a sitting president. That takes on a new precedent.”
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/03/s...d-spreadsheets-involving-trump/#ixzz4dI88qb2B
Meanwhile, whistling past the graveyard, CNN instructs viewers to ignore.
https://news.grabien.com/story-cnn-goes-rampage-against-susan-rice-bombshell-instructs-view
What we may end up with is the rather appalling situation in which members of both the last and current administrations end up facing criminal charges.
An amazing coincidence huh.
Crunch: get with the program. We've left Grey's Anatomy behind & moved on to Homeland. I'm thinking they are going to quietly cancel the next season of House of Cards - how can it possibly compete with this?
Other (slightly less partisan) sources point out that this is so far allegations and little of it is based on evidence the public has seen (...Other official sources with direct knowledge and who requested anonymity... - didn't the Don say we shouldn't trust this).
Even the Bloomburg piece (which is cited as a source by DC) is actually an opinion piece by a contributor who is not employed by Bloomberg (a point not mentioned by DC).
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/...ught-names-in-trump-intel-says-eli-lake-video
Now its certainly not good for the last administration, but its also not the smoking gun that it has been claimed, nor does it absolve the current administration in terms of the ongoing investigations.
What we may end up with is the rather appalling situation in which members of both the last and current administrations end up facing criminal charges.
I'm so tired of this political Civil War.
I'm semi-ok with it. The in-fighting means they spend less time passing the legislation you're advocating that they pass - legislation that does more harm than good. If our government gets nothing done, that's usually the best possible outcome.
Well, crumbling infrastructure has to be replaced eventually you can't just 'do nothing' and hope the problem goes away.
As for education, apparently Trump disagrees with you.
If he is being serious about Education being a fundamental right all kids should have access to, then I'm going to take him at his word and hope some good comes from it.