Anti-Video Game Senator Arrested!

Full article from the AP:

Associated Press
A California state senator who authored gun control legislation asked for campaign donations in exchange for introducing an undercover FBI agent to an arms trafficker, according to court documents unsealed Wednesday.

The allegations against State Sen. Leland Yee were outlined in an FBI affidavit in support of a criminal complaint. The affidavit accuses Yee of conspiracy to deal firearms without a license and to illegally import firearms. He was arrested Wednesday.

Yee is also accused of accepting tens of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions and cash payments to provide introductions, help a client get a contract and influence legislation. He or members of his campaign staff accepted at least $42,800 in cash or campaign contributions from undercover FBI agents in exchange for carrying out the agents’ specific requests, the court documents allege.

Yee discussed helping the agent get weapons worth $500,000 to $2.5 million, including shoulder fired automatic weapons and missiles, and took him through the entire process of acquiring them from a Muslim separatist group in the Philippines to bringing them to the United States, according to the affidavit by FBI Special Agent Emmanuel V. Pascua.

He was unhappy with his life and told the agent he wanted to hide out in the Philippines, according to the affidavit.

“There’s a part of me that wants to be like you,” he told the undercover agent, according to the affidavit. “You know how I’m going to be like you? Just be a free agent there.”

The introduction with the trafficker took place at a San Francisco restaurant earlier this month, according to the documents. Yee said he wouldn’t go to the Philippines until November.

“Once things start to move, it’s going to attract attention. We just got to be extra-extra careful,” he said, according to court documents.

The affidavit names Yee and 25 others, including Raymond Chow, a onetime gang leader with ties to San Francisco’s Chinatown known as “Shrimp Boy,” and Keith Jackson, Yee’s campaign aide. Jackson is accused of multiple counts of fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud.

Chow and Yee were arrested Wednesday during a series of raids in Sacramento and the San Francisco Bay Area.

According to court documents, Yee performed “official acts” in exchange for donations from undercover FBI agents, as he sought to dig himself out of a $70,000 debt incurred during a failed San Francisco mayoral bid.

Yee is also accused of accepting $10,000 in January 2013 from an undercover FBI agent in exchange for making a call to the California Department of Public Health in support of a contract was considering.

The agent who discussed arms with Yee presented himself as a member of Ghee Kung Tong, a fraternal organization in San Francisco’s Chinatown that Chow reportedly headed. It was among the sites searched Wednesday.

Firefighters were seen going inside with a circular saw and later said they had cracked a safe. FBI agents were seen coming out with boxes and trash bags full of evidence that they loaded into an SUV.

Chow is accused of money laundering, conspiracy to receive and transport stolen property and conspiracy to traffic contraband cigarettes.

Yee is the third Democratic senator to face charges this year. Sen. Rod Wright was convicted of perjury and voter fraud for lying about his legal residence in Los Angeles County, and Sen. Ron Calderon has been indicted on federal corruption charges. Wright and Calderon are taking a voluntary leave of absence, with pay, although Republicans have called for them to be suspended or expelled from the Legislature.

Mark Hedlund, spokesman for Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, confirmed that the FBI searched Yee’s office in the state capitol on Wednesday.

Steinberg, D-Sacramento, said he had no comment and did not know anything about the investigation.

Officers from the California Highway Patrol and Senate sergeant-at-arms details were standing guard outside Yee’s office, where a morning newspaper remained untouched.

Yee, 65, represents western San Francisco and much of San Mateo County. A spokesman for the senator, Dan Lieberman, said he had no comment, but the senator’s office would release a statement in the afternoon.

He is best known for his efforts to strengthen open records, government transparency and whistleblower protection laws, including legislation to close a loophole in state public records laws after the CSU Stanislaus Foundation refused to release its $75,000 speaking contract with former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin in 2010.

Chow ran a Chinese criminal organization with ties to Hong Kong and was convicted of gun charges. But he had recently been held up as an example of successful rehabilitation and was praised for his work in the community.

Yee’s arrest came as a shock to Chinese-Americans who see the senator as a pioneering leader in the community and a mainstay of San Francisco politics, said David Lee, director of the Chinese American Voters Education Committee.

“People are waiting to see what happens, and they are hoping for the best, that the charges turn out not to be true,” said Lee, whose organization just held a get-out-the-vote event with Yee and other Chinese-American elected officials last week.

For his efforts to uphold the California Public Records Act, Yee was honored last week by the Northern California chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists, which awarded him its public official citation for his efforts to maintain the requirements of the California Public Records Act.

Yee has at times clashed with fellow Democrats for casting votes of conscience, refusing to support the Democratic budget proposal in 2011 because of its deep cuts to education, social services and education. He also opposed legislation by a fellow Democrat, Assemblyman Paul Fong of Cupertino, that banned the sale of shark fins used for Chinese shark fin soup, saying that it unfairly targeted the Chinese-American community.

Yee is among three Democrats running this year for secretary of state, the office that oversees elections and campaign finance reporting. He lost a bid for mayor of San Francisco in 2011.

A man was charged last year for threatening Yee over legislation that he proposed to limit rapid reloading of assault weapons. The bill would have prohibited the use of devices that allow users to swiftly reload military-style assault weapons. Lee also authored legislation that that would have required the state to study safe storage of firearms.

Chow acknowledged in an unpublished autobiography that he ran prostitution rings in the 1980s, smuggled drugs and extorted thousands from business owners as a Chinatown gang member, KGO-TV reported two years ago.

In 1992, Chow was among more than two-dozen people indicted on racketeering charges for their alleged involvement in crimes ranging from teenage prostitution to an international drug trade mostly involving heroin.

He was later convicted of gun charges and sentenced to 25 years to life in prison. He spent 11 years in prison and was released in 2003 after he cut a deal with the government to testify against another high-ranking associate, Peter Chong. Chong was later convicted of racketeering.

Chow told KGO-TV in a 2012 interview that he had changed and was working with at-risk children in San Francisco.

U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California issued a statement in 2012 recognizing Chow as a former offender who had become an asset to his community, the Sacramento Bee reported. Chow was also praised by San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee for his “willingness to give back to the community,” the Bee reported.
 
How is his stance on video games, or alleged stance I should say, relevant to this at all? I see no mention of it whatsoever in the AP article.
 
I would say that his strong stance against semi-automatic rifles in the hands of civilians is more relevant due to the fact that this is an arms trafficking case.

According to the FBI file, Yee himself said he attempted to sell a rocket launcher. Absolutely crazy.

How is his stance on video games, or alleged stance I should say, relevant to this at all? I see no mention of it whatsoever in the AP article.

As far as video-games are concerned, Yee's stance was about anti-violence. He wanted to criminalize the sale of violent video games to minors and repeatedly made clear that his stance of video-games was due to the violence portrayed in the medium. He believes that gamers have a "lust" for violence.

The whole video games deal seems like a small hypocrisy next to a huge one.

Sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leland_Yee#Gun_and_corruption_charges
http://gamepolitics.com/2013/01/24/...me-debate-should-just-quiet-down#.UzSIchBdUty
 
How is his stance on video games, or alleged stance I should say, relevant to this at all? I see no mention of it whatsoever in the AP article.
It is ironic that the sole item that he campaigned on, violence in medium, was the reason that got him in trouble in the first place.

To explain, Yee's so called studies into violence in video games that had his game bill signed into law in 2005, was discredited within a year of passage. The law was struck down by the Supreme Court 7-2. Then came the infamous quote in 2013. All the while in real life, he was soliciting campaign funds in exchange for weapons, the very thing that he campaigned against.
 
Yes, he was against violence in video games. I understand that. What I don't see is any connection whatsoever between that stance on video games and his office being raided, the corruption charges, etc.

As for the hypocrisy, he's a politician. It's what they do. Not that that excuses it, sadly, but it's what we've come to expect.
 
Last edited:
Maybe I'm not just saying it right. Yee wasn't arrested for his stance on video games, we all know that. While video games can't kill people, he was arrested for trafficking something that does, guns.

Now you are telling me that it would have been alright to have laws that suppress something that would have taken a person's natural violent tendencies and turned it into something positive, and turn around and have a knee-jerk reaction and run guns out of the Philippines for the street gangs [I'll stop short of saying that the triads were involved as I don't know what particular gang was involved] of San Francisco.

Leland Yee has turned into a hypocrite of the level that city officials of Philly has turned into with their "campaign" to reduce crime. Philly has said that they want to reduce crime, but are making active efforts to close the only reasonable outlet that Philly teens have to do it themselves, and that is the Basketball courts.

What every anti-video game critic out there has failed to take into account is that these violent video games do virtually nothing to a person of reasonable morals. I should know, I've played video games for nearly 30 years.
 
Is it sad if I've never heard of this guy in my entire life? I remember Fred Thompson but nary heard a word about this guy.
 
He wanted to disarm civilians, but will illegally import military-grade weapons into the country for cash. What a scumbag. :lol: Much props to the FBI on this one, but how many more like him do we have around?
 
As far as video-games are concerned, Yee's stance was about anti-violence. He wanted to criminalize the sale of violent video games to minors and repeatedly made clear that his stance of video-games was due to the violence portrayed in the medium. He believes that gamers have a "lust" for violence.

What's the problem with that? Under 15 or 16 years of age and it should (at least it is here) be required that a parent or guardian is with you to buy the game. It certainly shouldn't be the opposite where any 6 or 7 year old can go out and buy the latest Grand Theft Auto without his or her parents knowing. The important thing is consent on the part of the parent who should understand the content that's in the game and what they're exposing their child to.
 
He wanted to disarm civilians, but will illegally import military-grade weapons into the country for cash. What a scumbag. :lol: Much props to the FBI on this one, but how many more like him do we have around?

How many in congress, whitehouse or any other political place?
 
What's the problem with that?
Because government-enforced ratings systems invariably lead to censorship, and video games are protected by the First Amendment from allowing that.

It certainly shouldn't be the opposite where any 6 or 7 year old can go out and buy the latest Grand Theft Auto without his or her parents knowing.
They already can't, in the sense that making it a criminal act to do so won't cut down on how to do so.
 
Last edited:
What's the problem with that? Under 15 or 16 years of age and it should (at least it is here) be required that a parent or guardian is with you to buy the game. It certainly shouldn't be the opposite where any 6 or 7 year old can go out and buy the latest Grand Theft Auto without his or her parents knowing. The important thing is consent on the part of the parent who should understand the content that's in the game and what they're exposing their child to.
It would be one thing if Yee was forcing stores to educate consumers on the content of the game based on the ESRB system, and then back off. However, what he wanted was for stores to refuse sales of said game if the 6 or 7 year old was in the same room, AND put special stickers on the game boxes themselves detailing the content of the game.

Give an inch, take a mile.
 
Because government-enforced ratings systems invariably lead to censorship, and video games are protected by the First Amendment from allowing that.


They already can't, in the sense that making it a criminal act to do so won't cut down on how to do so.


So what is too stop a child from getting a porno from a video store?

Classifications are so that kids are not subjected to gore, violence.

Australia has a rating system for games and movies and it hasn't lead to censorship.

Issue is it wont stop 8 year old from playing COD or battlefield.
since mommy or daddy will buy it for them.
 
Most of those were banned cause Australia didn't have a R18+ for games,
MA15+ was our highest and anything that was too extreme for that rating was simply banned.

I think you could still get those games through online stores like steam.
 
Most of those were banned cause Australia didn't have a R18+ for games,
MA15+ was our highest and anything that was too extreme for that rating was simply banned.
So the rating system has lead to censorship then.
 
Only for the average person.

I rather have a rating system than encounter a squeaker in every game I play.
 
8 year old from playing COD or battlefield.
Which doesn't sound like much of a problem in a lot of cases.

since mommy or daddy will buy it for them.
Unless they use the ratings and decide not to, which can happen even if they're oblivious to them as the seller could inform them at purchase.
 
Maybe I'm not just saying it right. Yee wasn't arrested for his stance on video games, we all know that.
Actually I didn't know that. The title of the thread certainly makes it sound like his anti-game stance was (at least part of) the reason for his arrest.
 
Australia has a rating system for games and movies and it hasn't lead to censorship.

Issue is it wont stop 8 year old from playing COD or battlefield.
since mommy or daddy will buy it for them.

Only for the average person.

I rather have a rating system than encounter a squeaker in every game I play.

Where's Green Day's "Walking Contradiction" when I need it?
 
Only for the average person.
That'll be a "yes".

Tornado's line was that enforced ratings systems lead to censorship. You said they don't because Australia has enforced ratings systems that, it turns out, has lead to censorship. That doesn't seem to be a rebuttal to me.
 
Actually I didn't know that. The title of the thread certainly makes it sound like his anti-game stance was (at least part of) the reason for his arrest.

Exactly as it has been said already the irony isn't what the OP thinks is ironic, rather him being anti-firearms more so Assault rifles is ironic. It'd be on the same scale as Feinstein selling an AR-15 to drug dealer, while being hugely against the ownership and legal distribution of them (which she is). That is the point @Sanji Himura
 
LOL. Any word if a tattooed, extreme-athlete/social activist stole his Corvette and jumped it off a bridge?

"Don't be a dick, Dick!"

00c5md.2151.jpg
 
Haha. "Only for the average citizen..." Wow. Just wow.
As for the op. I read it just fine. People just have a way of getting hung up on titles.
That Yes though. Forget the fact that he was anti video games. The dude was an anti gun advocate, while at the same time selling guns to criminal factions. This guy epitomizes the the second amendment nutters worst nightmare conspiracy theory.
 
So the rating system has lead to censorship then.
Australia now has an R-18 classification but some games are refused classification, which means they can't be sold BUT it is legal to possess them unless they contain illegal content (ie child porn).

Don't tell me that in the US child porn is not made illegal/censored.

A game will be refused classification if it has things like; detailed instructions or glorification of crime, disgusting sexual scenes/gameplay (eeerm bestiality, incest), sexual violence, extremely high cruelty etc.

But who wants to play that rubbish besides the creeps who don't get their stuff at the shops anyway.
 
R.S
Australia now has an R-18 classification but some games are refused classification, which means they can't be sold BUT it is legal to possess them unless they contain illegal content (ie child porn).

Don't tell me that in the US child porn is not made illegal/censored.

A game will be refused classification if it has things like; detailed instructions or glorification of crime, disgusting sexual scenes/gameplay (eeerm bestiality, incest), sexual violence, extremely high cruelty etc.

But who wants to play that rubbish besides the creeps who don't get their stuff at the shops anyway.


The last game I got for PC from the shops was borderlands 2 Ultimate Loot Chest Edition

I get everything else from steam since it is cheaper.
 
So let me get this straight. Australia does not have censorship of video games, but there are video games that Australia won't allow to be sold.

What would happen if one were to buy a prohibited (but not censored :)) game from an overseas outlet and the authorities knew about it? I have difficulty believing the answer would be "nothing".
 
Back