Any problems with the lambo aventador

  • Thread starter JDmsz
  • 57 comments
  • 7,692 views
722
United States
United States
dmsdmj
Have anybody got the turbo kit taken away from the lambo aventador? A friend of mine had an issue with it. His horsepower was at 917hp then it went to 889. So if you had the same issue post it here.
 
It's not that understeery if you ask me.. Sure, perhaps a tad.. But the speed it reaches require early early early braking.. Or else you'll plow in to the turn.

I did some laps in it around Nurburgring GP/F, and it was actually among the fastest ones..

Here's a list (I include all the times, perhaps it shows how fast it actually is).
It's 5th on this list, so I'd say it's pretty fast. It's all about corner entry. It actually oversteers quite a bit on the exits.. So slow in, fast out os the way to go. 👍

Nürburgring GP/F
On-line
Real grip reduction
Tire/fuel wear: OFF
Tire: Sport Hard
All cars fully broken in with oil changes and completely stock


Listed by fastest times:

Bugatti Vetron
SH: 2:05.017
Bhp: 1036
Weight (kg): 1888
PP: 646

McLaren F1
SH: 2:08.068
Bhp: 658
Weight (kg): 1140
PP: 619

Lamborghini Murcielago LP670-4 SV
SH: 2:08.448
Bhp: 693
Weight (kg): 1565
PP: 583

Nissan GT-R Black Series (R35)
SH: 2:08.925
Bhp: 569
Weight (kg): 1730
PP: 553

Lamborghini Aventador LP700-4
SH: 2:09.151
Bhp: 724
Weight (kg): 1575
PP: 590

Pagani Zonda C12S 7,3
SH: 2:09.413
Bhp: 576
Weight (kg): 1250
PP: 581

Pagani Zonda C12S
SH: 2:09.463
Bhp: 570
Weight (kg): 1350
PP: 572

Nissan GT-R SpecV (R35)
SH: 2:09.592
Bhp: 517
Weight (kg): 1680
PP: 543

Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 (C6)
SH: 2:09.785
Bhp: 670
Weight (kg): 1508
PP: 581

Ferrari Enzo
SH: 2:09.874
Bhp: 692
Weight (kg): 1255
PP: 591

Ford GT
SH: 2:10.005
Bhp: 577
Weight (kg): 1451
PP: 575

Lamborghini Gallardo LP560-4
SH: 2:10.033
Bhp: 580
Weight (kg): 1410
PP: 554

Ferrari 458 Italia
SH: 2:10.220
Bhp: 592
Weight (kg): 1485
PP: 566

Mercedes SLS AMG
SH: 2:10.524
Bhp: 599
Weight (kg): 1620
PP: 567

Nissan GT-R (R35)
SH: 2:10.528
Bhp: 508
Weight (kg): 1740
PP: 537

Dodge Viper SRT10 ACR
SH: 2:10.644
Bhp: 637
Weight (kg): 1552
PP: 587

Saleen S7
SH: 2:10.994
Bhp: 577
Weight (kg): 1250
PP: 571

McLaren MP4-12C
SH: 2:11.106
Bhp: 631
Weight (kg): 1350
PP: 573

Mercedes McLaren SLR
SH: 2:11.575
Bhp: 647
Weight (kg): 1768
PP: 584

AUDI R8 V10
SH: 2:11.766
Bhp: 544
Weight (kg): 1620
PP: 547

Ferrari 430 Scuderia
SH: 2:12.367
Bhp: 523
Weight (kg): 1350
PP: 554

Chevrolet Corvette Z06 (C6)
SH: 2:12.779
Bhp: 529
Weight (kg): 1421
PP: 547

Lamborghini Murcielago LP640-4
SH: 2:12.928
Bhp: 662
Weight (kg): 1665
PP: 559

Ferrari F430
SH: 2:13.077
Bhp: 520
Weight (kg): 1450
PP: 547

Ferrari 599 GTB
SH: 2:13.781
Bhp: 643
Weight (kg): 1580
PP: 552

Dodge Viper SRT10
SH: 2:13.973
Bhp: 534
Weight (kg): 1565
PP: 541

RUF CTR2
SH: 2:14.785
Bhp: 506
Weight (kg): 1380
PP: 535

Mercedes SL65 AMG
SH: 2:16.210
Bhp: 634
Weight (kg): 2028
PP: 554

Cizeta V16T
SH: 2:16.432
Bhp: 609
Weight (kg): 1640
PP: 552

Spyker C8 Laviolette
SH: 2:17.594
Bhp: 471
Weight (kg): 1070
PP: 533
 
Lamborghini Murcielago LP670-4 SV
SH: 2:08.448
Bhp: 693
Weight (kg): 1565
PP: 583

Lamborghini Aventador LP700-4
SH: 2:09.151
Bhp: 724
Weight (kg): 1575
PP: 590

Thanks for confirming, I was also under the impression that Murcielago LP670-4 SV is slightly faster than Aventador, though I'm quite sure my Aventador has not so much power, mine's got cca 680 bhp. Not sure if I did the oil change, but I think I did.


Actually when I read the forum title, I was thinking the issue on your mind is the quite long gap between shifting from 1st to 2nd gear, which I experience, regardles the revs.
 
Thanks for confirming, I was also under the impression that Murcielago LP670-4 SV is slightly faster than Aventador, though I'm quite sure my Aventador has not so much power, mine's got cca 680 bhp. Not sure if I did the oil change, but I think I did.


Actually when I read the forum title, I was thinking the issue on your mind is the quite long gap between shifting from 1st to 2nd gear, which I experience, regardles the revs.
A stock one should have 700hp, with oil change a bit more.
 
A stock one should have 700hp, with oil change a bit more.

Haha now you got me, it definitelly is possible since I can't remember, and I was looking at it yesterday. :) I'll check the power in the evening. ;) Is it possible the SV Murcielago has cca 680 bhp?
 
The BHP and PP figures in my list is reached thru buying the car - drive it for 186 Miles (300 km) - change oil - voila!

Fully broken in engines with oil change:
Aventador: 724 bhp
Murciélago LP670-4 SV: 693 bhp

👍
 
A couple of days ago I saw a green Aventador in Jesolo (near Venice, Italy). The street was near the beach so cars were going slow. The Aventador passed at 30 km/h and everybody turns their head. The engine was rumbling in 1st gear. Even at the minimum it was an awesome noise.

I think GT5 version is way off proportions. Expecially real wheels size. In GT5 are not large enough compared to real life. Look here is a pic (not my pic, wasn't fast enough to photo it LOL). Photos are not enough to represent real life proportions though. You have to see one in real life to understand what I mean.

IMG_0457-1024x682.jpg


Rear tyres are massive. The car is really really large and low. PD version is not correct.
 
A couple of days ago I saw a green Aventador in Jesolo (near Venice, Italy). The street was near the beach so cars were going slow. The Aventador passed at 30 km/h and everybody turns their head. The engine was rumbling in 1st gear. Even at the minimum it was an awesome noise.

I think GT5 version is way off proportions. Expecially real wheels size. In GT5 are not large enough compared to real life. Look here is a pic (not my pic, wasn't fast enough to photo it LOL). Photos are not enough to represent real life proportions though. You have to see one in real life to understand what I mean.

IMG_0457-1024x682.jpg


Rear tyres are massive. The car is really really large and low. PD version is not correct.

Please tell me more about how seeing a car once, briefly in real life, has made you an expert at 3D model recreation. And how inaccurate a multi million dollar developer is at making them.
 
The Lambo above seems to have non stock wheels :D and Aventador can be turbocharged in GT5 via hybrid, but the exhaust sound would be inaudible :(
 
Please tell me more about how seeing a car once, briefly in real life, has made you an expert at 3D model recreation. And how inaccurate a multi million dollar developer is at making them.

Hmmm, you mean the same developer who starts the game with a disclaimer that says the cars in this game may differ from the real ones in size, shape, color and performance?
 
Hmmm, you mean the same developer who starts the game with a disclaimer that says the cars in this game may differ from the real ones in size, shape, color and performance?

Which is only there in the event they do make a mistake they cant be sued for it.
 
Please tell me more about how seeing a car once, briefly in real life, has made you an expert at 3D model recreation. And how inaccurate a multi million dollar developer is at making them.

Please tell me more about how PD being a multimillion dollar developer means they are above making modeling errors. And how he said that he was an expert in 3D modeling because he pointed out that he felt the car wasn't modeled correctly after seeing one in real life.


I mean, I really loved the year or so that GT5 was on the market where the Audi R8 V10 very obviously had a V8 in the engine bay:

original


But since you have all the answers maybe you can provide explanations for the above.
 
I'd just like to point out that only 2 people have actually been on topic here.

Did any of you actually read the OP - or did you just read the title?

@OP - Unfortunately I can't help you as don't dabble with forced boosting.
 
I'd just like to point out that only 2 people have actually been on topic here.

Did any of you actually read the OP - or did you just read the title?

@OP - Unfortunately I can't help you as don't dabble with forced boosting.

Upon further review, this thread is actually 10 months old, and HKS revived it with non related rambles...
 
I'd just like to point out that only 2 people have actually been on topic here.

Did any of you actually read the OP - or did you just read the title?

I read seanneedscar acting like his usual self towards someone, so I felt fit to point out to him that he's about as on point with his snide comments as he usually is.
 
Upon further review, this thread is actually 10 months old, and HKS revived it with non related rambles...

Well shoot..

I thought I had learned my lesson on this long ago :lol: I normally make a habit of checking the dates.

I read seanneedscar acting like his usual self towards someone, so I felt fit to point out to him that he's about as on point with his snide comments as he usually is.

No sweat :lol: it wasn't really aimed at anyone in particular, just an observation.
 
Have anybody got the turbo kit taken away from the lambo aventador? A friend of mine had an issue with it. His horsepower was at 917hp then it went to 889. So if you had the same issue post it here.

No Lambo has the option to add a Turbo... Unless your friend was into hybriding before everybody else...
 
Please tell me more about how PD being a multimillion dollar developer means they are above making modeling errors.

HKS said the Aventador was, and I quote, "way off proportions". Which it obviously isn't. Are PD "way off" in their executions? Certainly not.

And how he said that he was an expert in 3D modeling because he pointed out that he felt the car wasn't modeled correctly after seeing one in real life.

I was, in typical fashion, pointing out his error in an acrimonious way. If you perhaps spent more time deciphering my sarcasm, than you do coding up your extravagant fecal-brown text, we wouldn't have these misunderstandings.

I mean, I really loved the year or so that GT5 was on the market where the Audi R8 V10 very obviously had a V8 in the engine bay:

Sounds like quite the arduous existence you have.

Unfortunately for you, the topic at hand is proportion errors. Therefore this part of your post is completely irrelevant, and does nothing to bolster your position.

But since you have all the answers maybe you can provide explanations for the above.

Sure. In an effort to save time, PD copypasta'd the V10 Audi out of the V8. The end result being expedited delivery of goods to the customer. Was the situation resolved? Certainly was. In proper, multi-million dollar developer fashion. What more can you ask for?

I read seanneedscar acting like his usual self towards someone,

"Someone" who has exhumed a nearly-year old thread with a pointless and erroneous observation. Befitting of a mocking, in my opinion.

so I felt fit to point out to him that he's about as on point with his snide comments as he usually is.

Conjecture.
 
HKS said the Aventador was, and I quote, "way off proportions". Which it obviously isn't. Are PD "way off" in their executions? Certainly not.
And what was the reasoning you gave for why he was wrong? Oh, right. Because PD is a multimillion dollar developer, which means they don't make mistakes so he should shut up because he's not an expert like them.

I was, in typical fashion, pointing out his error in an acrimonious way. If you perhaps spent more time deciphering my sarcasm, than you do coding up your extravagant fecal-brown text, we wouldn't have these misunderstandings.
No, I understood the sarcasm. Don't give yourself too much credit, now. It's just that it was unwarranted because it's hard to be a smartass when your justification for doing so is a load of nonsense (or feces, if you're so inclined). Maybe if you wouldn't constantly talk down to people over stuff that you clearly have no clue about, and perhaps spent more time looking up information about the things that you like to think you know about so you can act like an ass (or, using your 5 dollar words, "in an acrimonious way") to people over them, we probably wouldn't even talk to each other at all.


Alas, you clearly can't help yourself.


Sounds like quite the arduous existence you have.
You better believe it. Stuff like this just makes my day, though.

Unfortunately for you, the topic at hand is proportion errors. Therefore this part of your post is completely irrelevant, and does nothing to bolster your position.
Unfortunately for you, when you make the claim that the model in question is correct because PD made it and they are a multimillion dollar developer and HKS racer is not so it obviously must be, you open the door for any example that shows how patently absurd the statement is. You said nothing about proportions. You made the claim that it couldn't be wrong because of who made it. The Audi was just the easiest to find the picture of, but it's not the only one.

Sure. In an effort to save time, PD copypasta'd the V10 Audi out of the V8. The end result being expedited delivery of goods to the customer. Was the situation resolved? Certainly was. In proper, multi-million dollar developer fashion. What more can you ask for?
Them doing it right in the first place would be nice.


Also just want to make sure: You're saying that in real life the V10 version of the car also came with a V8, because that would be the only way you could stick to your earlier statement for why HSK racer is so obviously wrong.


"Someone" who has exhumed a nearly-year old thread with a pointless and erroneous observation. Befitting of a mocking, in my opinion.
No. Someone saying something like "cars with short wheelbases automatically handle better than ones with longer wheelbases" in a confrontational and condescending way is something worth mocking. Someone saying something like "car sounds are completely relative; and since I think the sounds in GT5 are perfectly fine your argument is invalid" is something worth mocking. Someone who goes into a thread discussing a physics issue to mock people for bringing it up because they shouldn't care about physics issues in a simulator is something worth mocking.


Someone pointing out in a thread that was named "problems with the Lambo Aventador" that they feel the car was modeled incorrectly based on what it looked like when they pretty recently saw one in real life sounds much more like something worth checking out.


Conjecture.
It's kinda cute how you think it's hard to look up your posting history; especially after you just admitted that your behavior in this thread was typical.
 
Last edited:
Back