Assetto Corsa PC Mods General DiscussionPC 

  • Thread starter daan
  • 139,016 comments
  • 38,175,336 views
Dude, 49 is ancient. Stable yes.. but trust me, the latest is perfect, plus you get updated shaders, sparks etc.etc. And its perfectly stable and good.
Just click the fat box, one click and you're done.

904n0i.png

No offense , but I'm pretty sure I'll go by what the actual tester's are rating the version's at. It may be great for what you're driving , but overall they are still having issue's with it , otherwise it would be listed as " Stable ". And it isn't. As soon as CM themselve's list it as being stable , then I'd be more than happy to run it. The version I'm using right now has been flawless , and I doubt very much the issue I posted about has anything to do with the shader version I'm using. And going through the discord channel , it seems a lot of people are still using the exact same version as I am.
 
No offense , but I'm pretty sure I'll go by what the actual tester's are rating the version's at. It may be great for what you're driving , but overall they are still having issue's with it , otherwise it would be listed as " Stable ". And it isn't. As soon as CM themselve's list it as being stable , then I'd be more than happy to run it. The version I'm using right now has been flawless , and I doubt very much the issue I posted about has anything to do with the shader version I'm using. And going through the discord channel , it seems a lot of people are still using the exact same version as I am.

The ONLY thing that you need preview 74 to use is the latest version of SOL on RD. Otherwise 49 is the way to go as far as I understand.
 
Well the king of paid mods, RSS, is working on two new cars, from the NGT series. So if you're waiting for something cool, really cool, keep waiting :banghead::D
The two? Porsche and Ferrari. :ouch:

2hp51f8.jpg

rj4feo.jpg
Aren't there already Kunos equivalents of those two cars? The 458 GT2 and 911 GT3 CUP 2017?
 
I'm sure they'll be nice mods, but I'm also sure they will use a lot of copypasta from Kunos cars and charge money for it.
 
I'm sure they'll be nice mods, but I'm also sure they will use a lot of copypasta from Kunos cars and charge money for it.

Thats pretty gutless for you to say, obviously you don't know jack ****. A few of their cars they've put over 3,000 man hours into a single car. Maybe you should get your facts straight before running your mouth hole.
 
Thats pretty gutless for you to say, obviously you don't know jack ****. A few of their cars they've put over 3,000 man hours into a single car. Maybe you should get your facts straight before running your mouth hole.
Triggered. Technically I'm not running my moth hole, I'm running my fingers.

But honestly, it makes logical sense to reuse assets that are already there. It's not about getting facts straight it's about making logical deductions based on my own experience with how mod communities--especially those that insist on charging money--operate. Anyone can throw numbers around as if they're important but that doesn't automatically guarantee they're free from any amount of copypasta.

You seem to have an obvious bias toward this group which causes shortsightedness.
 
Last edited:
Triggered? 2015 called, they want their adjective back, try again.
It only makes "logical sense" in your narrow mind because you obviously don't know who are what RSS is so you've come to you're own conclusion in your small head.

And you're mod community experience obviously isn't playing with a full deck. And you're copypasta stupid phrase really shows what a follower you are.

Its not biased, perhaps you should look up the definition of the word before trying to act as though you have more than 5 firing synapses at work.
 
Triggered? 2015 called, they want their adjective back, try again.
It only makes "logical sense" in your narrow mind because you obviously don't know who are what RSS is so you've come to you're own conclusion in your small head.

And you're mod community experience obviously isn't playing with a full deck. And you're copypasta stupid phrase really shows what a follower you are.

Its not biased, perhaps you should look up the definition of the word before trying to act as though you have more than 5 firing synapses at work.
Right. Instead of coming up with an intelligent response the only thing you can do is call me a follower despite having showed obvious bias yourself? Well I'll tell you what, when the mod comes out you are free to waste your time trying to prove me wrong that not a single piece of their content wasn't copied from another source. I don't care to know the history of all these mod groups that insist on charging me money for content. Wrongfully (and illegally) charging money makes me less likely to care and less likely to praise them for their '3,000' hours of work.
 
Right. Instead of coming up with an intelligent response the only thing you can do is call me a follower despite having showed obvious bias yourself? Well I'll tell you what, when the mod comes out you are free to waste your time trying to prove me wrong that not a single piece of their content wasn't copied from another source. I don't care to know the history of all these mod groups that insist on charging me money for content. Wrongfully (and illegally) charging money makes me less likely to care and less likely to praise them for their '3,000' hours of work.

I did come up with an intelligent response, you're just to inept to understand it. Again, look up the definition of biased. "I don't care to know the history of all these mod groups that insist on charging me money for content.". Then you fail to understand that there are only a few, pure scratch built modders out there, because you fail to do you're research. And instead of doing so, you lump them all into the same category.

Biased you say? Maybe you should understand that you, are being that, based on your own admittance of " not caring to know the history of these mod groups".

Illegally? Strong words. Care to back that up with RSS mods? Here's your platform and time to shine. Let's see if you can. But you wont and you'll just resort to being extorted by having to pay for something that you know nothing about.
 
And let me tell YOU pal. YOU were the one that made the claim of it being illegal and them stealing data from Kunos, and for me to prove you wrong.
It doesn't work that way kiddo. You made the claim, you back up you're statement. Its not my job to prove your claim wrong.
 
you'll just resort to being extorted by having to pay for something that you know nothing about.
Who's gutless now? I don't pay **** for pay mods. I pirate them and I'm not afraid to say that. And if I ever were in the future going to spend money on such an illegal practice I'd do so to share the paid content with others for free. Again, I have no shame for this. The shame should be on mod creators for charging money for content that requires the use of other legally registered works of a game developer (Kunos in this case), said legal works that they [the mod creators] don't legally own themselves.

You want to make money for a mesh you created? Sell it on turbosquid or another site where you can legally do so as you're then only selling the mesh that is independent from requiring others legal works.

The only people that should be allowed to legally sell content for the game are Kunos themselves.
 
Last edited:
Hey harvee, since you say RSS steals Kunos data etc. You probably don't know but those modders that steal from others to create their own, usually steal interiors, engine sounds etc. You tell me where this RSS interior was stolen from.

You made the claim, lets see you find a match, because you won't. And if you know what you're doing, go analyze the geometry data and see if its a Kunos match, because it will tell you. I bet you can't or won't, you'll just come back to running your mouth.

Tell everyone where they stole this from, especially from Kunos.

4i0v9w.png

wv1z86.png
 
Triggered. Technically I'm not running my moth hole, I'm running my fingers.

But honestly, it makes logical sense to reuse assets that are already there. It's not about getting facts straight it's about making logical deductions based on my own experience with how mod communities--especially those that insist on charging money--operate. Anyone can throw numbers around as if they're important but that doesn't automatically guarantee they're free from any amount of copypasta.

You seem to have an obvious bias toward this group which causes shortsightedness.
Before stating what you mentioned you may want to check first.
All It would take for you to do so is included in Content Manager.

RSS is actually very well known in the modding community as one of the premium modding groups that create absolute first rate 100 % scratch made content and have in their mods in many ways pushed the envelope when It comes to exceeding quality and ingenious solutions of details in their mods.
None of their mods uses "copy paste" Kunos content. Every one of their mod group is a highly skilled and regarded specialist in their own field.

The comments you made may be done in a loose fashion but as of their inaccuracy can come over very insulting to these people who have worked very hard to make mosts such as the RSS GT1 mods or the NGT extension of that mod happen.

Who's gutless now? I don't pay **** for pay mods. I pirate them and I'm not afraid to say that. And if I ever were in the future going to spend money on such an illegal practice I'd do so to share the paid content with others for free. Again, I have no shame for this. The shame should be on mod creators for charging money for content that requires the use of other legally registered works of a game developer (Kunos in this case), said legal works that they [the mod creators] don't legally own themselves.
This is a very, very unfortunate attitude.
You clearly do not seem to understand the difference between actual professional content creators at a high degree such as RSS and simple steal, grab, copy + paste operations who repackage other peoples content and con people into paying money for stolen content.

It is arguable ethical free game to share freely stolen content, ESPECIALLY from "steal + repackage + sell" rip off artists It surely is absolutely not ok to pirate content from the good people who work hard to create content from scratch and as of the very high effort this takes at the level sims as AC demand these days ask a modest price for these mods.

I will always support modding groups such as RSS or the DRM Revival guys buy buying their content. Pirating it is in no way different than robbing hand bags or stealing cars.
 
RSS is actually very well known in the modding community as one of the premium modding groups that create absolute first rate 100 % scratch made content and have in their mods in many ways pushed the envelope when It comes to exceeding quality and ingenious solutions of details in their mods.

None of their mods uses "copy paste" Kunos content. Every one of their mod group is a highly skilled and regarded specialist in their own field.

Well thanks for the clarification. Now I'm educated. It still doesn't change my stance on them being paid content.

The comments you made may be done in a loose fashion but as of their inaccuracy can come over very insulting to these people who have worked very hard to make mosts such as the RSS GT1 mods or the NGT extension of that mod happen.

I don't care. It isn't my responsibility to please people.


This is a very, very unfortunate attitude.
You clearly do not seem to understand the difference between actual professional content creators at a high degree such as RSS and simple steal, grab, copy + paste operations who repackage other peoples content and con people into paying money for stolen content.
I'm against paid mods regardless of their quality or the amount of work put into them. I consider paid mods a plague that otherwise hurts modding communities. I don't care if it's professional work or steal+grab+copy+paste as you put it.

I'm not saying others should claim the content as theirs, but I don't see any harm in sharing it for free if credits are given to the original authors.

It is arguable ethical free game to share freely stolen content, ESPECIALLY from "steal + repackage + sell" rip off artists It surely is absolutely not ok to pirate content from the good people who work hard to create content from scratch and as of the very high effort this takes at the level sims as AC demand these days ask a modest price for these mods.

I will always support modding groups such as RSS or the DRM Revival guys buy buying their content. Pirating it is in no way different than robbing hand bags or stealing cars.
Well I guess work under unethical conditions. To woe is me.
 
Attention:
I do NOT have the RTM F1 Espace mod, which is probably utter guff anyway, if it actually exists.
PLEASE stop PMing me for it. All future PMs about the Espace will be deleted without reply.
My 'check your PMs' message was aimed at a first-post mod beggar, the worst kind of non-contributors.

:lol:
 
Attention:
I do NOT have the RTM F1 Espace mod, which is probably utter guff anyway, if it actually exists.
PLEASE stop PMing me for it. All future PMs about the Espace will be deleted without reply.

Even though I've never posted here before, I've been following this thread for about a year and if I took a shot for every time I heard someone talk about that damn espace mod...
 
Attention:
I do NOT have the RTM F1 Espace mod, which is probably utter guff anyway, if it actually exists.
PLEASE stop PMing me for it. All future PMs about the Espace will be deleted without reply.
My 'check your PMs' message was aimed at a first-post mod beggar, the worst kind of non-contributors.

:lol:


BRB.
*silently deletes PM draft asking for the RTM F1 Espace*
 
Sharing a mod? Host it on GTPlanet Downloads. Free, public hosting for files up to 10GB in size.
Back