From Velos Mods, an update to that gorgeous but undriveable Ferrari 512s:
RELEASE-UPDATE
Ferrari 512s by RTM
Update by VELO
New Ferrari V12 sound by Fonsecker.
Complete physics overhaul.
Some shader work, tyres. power lut, car UI.json, suspension, updated.......plus lots of other stuff.
Mac Ten resized car to correct length...(car was too long).
Enjoy.
https://mega.nz/#!wUNG3KYJ!rym7tGnmp9nr9pCSFF4FNBKDcGxb-kfMACuj_U9lnF8 (Edit: now a dead link. Did anyone nab this update and can send me a new link? The RTM version is awful so I was looking forward to driving this one).
Additional skins for Ferrari 512s with thanks to David H Fiallo, supplier to RTM.
https://mega.nz/#!kc1xRIgY!etpNOK491RP3X7tdTeVzjSHMN7EJjfslH4V7KxskDyY
Man...I was just coming here specifically to talk about this car!
I came across the Velos & Mac-Ten version of the car and seeing how I just downloaded the other 512 S two days ago, I'd like to do a comparison and see what's up between the two. The Velos 512S comes with Soft, Med, Hard & Vintage tires whereas the other 512S only comes with Vintage tires. Both cars are using the same exact Vintage tires. The Velos car happens to define an Explosion point for bursting a tire. I forget exactly what it was. I'm happy to finally see a modder using that parameter.
I continued to look for differences in the more obvious "important" areas. Suspension/Chassis, Transmission, Engine & Brakes.
There is a corrected wheelbase value for the Velos car, as you pointed out Masscot. The original wheelbase was 2.533 and the Velos wheelbase is 2.300. Center of Gravity in the same 0.45. The track value, front and back is also slightly different. The fuel tank locations are different, but I don't know anything about placing the tank...I just saw slightly different numbers so I know the position can't be exactly the same, especially with a shortening of the wheelbase.
The suspension is all setup exactly the same however there are slight difference in ARB & Wheel Rate values. Front/Rear ARB values for Velos mod: 22000/5750. ARB Values for the other 512 S: 24000/6000. Velos Front Springs: 35300 Other 512 S: 34270. Both cars are using the same Rear Springs: 48080.
There are some other slight differences in Rod Length (that's what she said!), Toe Out & Camber...very small differences not even worth worrying about.
Transmission Gear Box is the same -- Brakes are the same. I'm thinking about making an adjustment to the brakes of the Velos 512 S (I'm not keeping the other car on my SSD). It's easy to get the brakes into the red temperature wise before 2 laps of Goodwood finish if you go hard on them. I don't think racing brakes would do that. It's not like I'm driving with my left foot slightly on the brake the whole time. I was just being slightly more aggressive than I normally am. I'm either going to extend the Green Zone of the brake temperature by about 40-50 degrees or I'm going to decrease the cooling time slightly...to make them cool down faster. Not much.
Oh yeah, I wanted to point out something that made me laugh. When I opened up the tyres.ini file for the Velos car I immediately saw this at the top of the text file:
Code:
;Ferruccio 55 Car Mod
;File generated on 23/12/2017 17:18:43 CET
;Copyright & Proprietary Race Sim Studio
No honor among thieves!!!
So, now we know where they got the Soft, Med & Hard slicks...
It's a shame I don't have that GT1 pack from RSS so I can't look to see if it's been altered for the Ferrari 512 S. I would guess it has been adjusted. I don't think tires designed for a Ferrari GT1 are going to perfectly work for an old, very light Ferrari 512 S. I'm sure they'd be way too stiff...no flex...no camber gain...etc. Even if I'm wrong, the performance still couldn't be all that great.
Oh...one big difference is the sound. The Velos/Mac-Ten 512 S-MT sounds so much better. 👍 I figured I would post this information just in case someone wants to take both for a spin and test them. I can't tell you which vehicle would be faster overall, but my guess would be the Velos car. It feels much, much better on the track.