Assetto Corsa PC Mods General DiscussionPC
- Thread starter daan
- 138,968 comments
- 38,115,770 views
- 1,362
This might be an issue of one of the extra control buttons being hit or activated that's set up to open the trunk. However, after seeing this, I'm going to have to drive it again. During really hard braking, I swear I kept seeing something happening in the rear view mirror, like a wing or something was lifting.
- 39
- France
Just a quick dirty rainfx and grassfx extension + a reworked cam (won't overwrite the existing one) for a nice little track :
Athens-Megara Circuit v0.6
https://www.racedepartment.com/downloads/athens-megara-circuit-greece.47602/
Athens-Megara Circuit v0.6
https://www.racedepartment.com/downloads/athens-megara-circuit-greece.47602/
- 783
- South Africa
Nothing to activate. CM looks (when you first click the button) for the licensed EXE and prompts you if it can't find SimplyGon.exe.
But that happens after your problem, if I understand you correctly.
You don't see a "Generate LODs" button at the bottom of the car details page, right?
Silly Q, but is developer mode on? Lots of stuff hides, if it's not.
Last edited:
- 799
- Italy
- 158
- Germany
Cool. Any idea, why? Known issue or individual problem?
- 1,001
- Montserrat
- 65
- Greece
Hello to everyone and a happy new year!
Noob question here.
In the power graph section of the cars there are three options. The two of them are "recalculate curves...". Which one should i use (what's the purpose of these options) and does it actually change the performance of the car? (i.e. tranmission loss).
Thank you in advance.
Noob question here.
In the power graph section of the cars there are three options. The two of them are "recalculate curves...". Which one should i use (what's the purpose of these options) and does it actually change the performance of the car? (i.e. tranmission loss).
Thank you in advance.
- 783
- South Africa
Last first.
No, none of these change the car's performance.
They only draw the curves on the graph (and one changes the displayed values for BHP and Torque)
Performance depends on the data in the engine.ini and power.lut files (which might be packed in data.acd)
The only one I use, is "recalculate curves using data only".
This option uses the data in the files, which represent torque at the wheels, and the transmission loss you choose (generally accepted as 15%) to calculate power and torque values at the crankshaft (so working backwards), plots those values on the UI graph, and sets the resulting values for BHP and Torque which are displayed in the UI (and saved/stored in car_ui.json).
The upshot of using this is a real view of what the modder has done in the physics. If the real car had 100 bhp at the crank, and that feels too sluggish, the modder may have gee'd it up some, to drive better. This will show that.
The other two options take a more ... "fairy-tale" view of the whole exercise, either simply vertically stretching/compressing the graphs (scaling) to match the displayed peak BHP and Torque values, ie. "It had 100 BHP at the crank, fake the graphs look like that", or using an undisclosed formula to use the data in the files, AND the displayed UI values, and somehow draw the curves from both those data sources, to match the displayed UI values. I guess these options are for folks who don't care what the modder has done, they'd like the UI to reflect what the car really had (or whatever they chose to enter in the BHP and Torque UI values).
Again, NONE of these change the actual data, or car performance, ONLY what you see in the UI.
Hope that helps.
- 1
- Argentina
hello happy new year, do you still have those mods?
- 695
- Canada
- evilgloomy
Happy New Year everyone! Hopefully these are new to some of you!
GT Sport Alpine A110
Updated Ferrari SF90 Stradale
GT Sport Alpine A110
Updated Ferrari SF90 Stradale
Last edited:
- 506
- Braunschweig, Germany
- 2
- Finland
Hi Guys,
is there a fix for vhe_hockenheim 1.2 or 1.3 for the pitproblem with overspeeding a little bit on some areas in the pitlane? i tried frankalexandre´s meshupdate but unfortunally the problem occurs again. Any help is very appreciated. thank you.
is there a fix for vhe_hockenheim 1.2 or 1.3 for the pitproblem with overspeeding a little bit on some areas in the pitlane? i tried frankalexandre´s meshupdate but unfortunally the problem occurs again. Any help is very appreciated. thank you.
- 33
- Algeria
Hello everyone and happy new year!
Does anyone know how to make the newly released 205 Rallye (msc_peugeot_205_rallye) a bit better physics wise?
The mod is so good it's a shame the car doesn't know any kind of lift off oversteer, like the rear is glued to the tarmac, you really have to try hard or with the handbrake to make it loose, when in fact the 205 (any version, some more than others) is quite known for its precise driving requirements when attacking. Thanks !
Edit :
Same thing for the Alpine A110 2017 posted a few posts above mine, it's so planted even with max toe out in rear, the A110 being a stable but nimble and tricky car (seeing the reviews), I would expect it more "lively"
Does anyone know how to make the newly released 205 Rallye (msc_peugeot_205_rallye) a bit better physics wise?
The mod is so good it's a shame the car doesn't know any kind of lift off oversteer, like the rear is glued to the tarmac, you really have to try hard or with the handbrake to make it loose, when in fact the 205 (any version, some more than others) is quite known for its precise driving requirements when attacking. Thanks !
Edit :
Same thing for the Alpine A110 2017 posted a few posts above mine, it's so planted even with max toe out in rear, the A110 being a stable but nimble and tricky car (seeing the reviews), I would expect it more "lively"
Last edited:
- 300
- Brazil
Camtool for Hockenheim
GP Layout
GP Layout
Last edited:
- 300
- Brazil
It's back again https://assettoland10.wixsite.com/assettoland/cars
CSP 0.1.77-preview1 and Pure 0.58
Can someone explain this weird bug? Probably happening with all cars. The Senna is rwd by the way.
Tire marks not coming from the correct tires and changes place. Barely noticeable with regular track cameras
First shot is camtool, second take is from a track camera (F3)
Second shot is to make sure it's not marks from the front tires while braking. It wasn't the case.
CSP 0.1.77-preview1 and Pure 0.58
Can someone explain this weird bug? Probably happening with all cars. The Senna is rwd by the way.
Tire marks not coming from the correct tires and changes place. Barely noticeable with regular track cameras
First shot is camtool, second take is from a track camera (F3)
Second shot is to make sure it's not marks from the front tires while braking. It wasn't the case.
Last edited by a moderator:
- 6,688
- The Bunker
Thanks for the heads up about the A110, it's nice to see this beautiful car finally get the respect it deserves in AC. Lucac26 really did do a fantastic job with the conversion. The cockpit is a wonderful place to occupy in VR.GT Sport Alpine A110
Here's a promo video that he made for the launch in case anyone needs convincing further.
- 259
- Turkey
- 209
- Alberta
- ThunderTHR
- ThunderTHRx
- 1,201
- Arrakis
And not being able to adjust the steering assist setting in the config file upsets my driving experience too!
Oh well. In the trash it goes.
And I might as well be the first person to say it in 2022: For these reasons, I hate encryption. 😁 What a waste of an otherwise very nice mod.
- 2,186
- Helsinki
re: encrypted previews
I have an idea on how to possibly overcome this if you are desperate...
1. copy desired showroom to ./tracks
2. add an AC_PIT_0 to the showroom-track at position 0,0,0 with Blender/3dsimed
3. launch track
4. take screenshot
5. copy screenshot to skin folder as preview.png
cheers!
I have an idea on how to possibly overcome this if you are desperate...
1. copy desired showroom to ./tracks
2. add an AC_PIT_0 to the showroom-track at position 0,0,0 with Blender/3dsimed
3. launch track
4. take screenshot
5. copy screenshot to skin folder as preview.png
cheers!
Similar threads
