- 285

- United Kingdom
Thanks for the reply, what i mean really is i use so many modded tracks and cars etc that i find Pure varies a lot more and shows off the 'bad' mod tracks far more than Ilija's default weather.If you use the "pure" ppfilter, you can tweak your preferred style in the Pure PP app "Script" tab.
Its hard to make a visual style that fits everybody's needs and tasts.
In the Pure PP app you have those 2 sliders, where you can bend the visuals to your taste.
View attachment 1417646
The main difference of the styles is mostly "photorealistic" camera look and eye-realistic look:
View attachment 1417647
photorealistic
View attachment 1417648
And its always the way how the much bigger real light dynamic is presented in a low dynamic picture.
For many people it is "realisitc" if bright things are shown in overblown tones. Thats the way they knew it from photos or videos.
But there are also many users who want to have the colors/dynamics adapted, so the low dynamic screen just represents a scaled dynamic and not a limited/cropped dynamic.
I can use Pure on say Mugello and it looks awesome, then drive on some mod track by a good modder, and the trees look too bright or whatever..
I amount i flit around in AC and fiddle i need consistent, so its not really a problem with Pure, more that i would rather a more consistent but a bit less fancy, than fancy but less consistent.
The mist effect is really cool though, but weirdly PCars 2 is the game that does that best and no one else aside from you has ever bothered again in any driving sim.
Great thing is there are choices in AC.
Last edited: