- 1,336
- United States
Then he needs to do the same. The reviewers he attacked criticized his work, not his person. He came back with personal attacks. So who is the one guilty of criticizing someone's person? Seems pretty obvious to me who it is. And as I said, if he wants to make it personal, then I can't defend the guy when he gets attacked personally. He is the one who opened the door...Or we could just criticise the work and not the person. Why does everything have to be ad hominem attacks these days? I blame Trump. But obviously, I'm not criticising him. Just his hairdo.
Last edited: