From what I've read on F1.com and heard on TV, the cars have to use the same tires used for both qualifying laps and cannot refuel before the race after Sunday qualifying. If the race steward deems the track as "wet", the teams will be allowed to change tires. More info can be found here - http://www.formula1.com/insight/rulesandregs/13/995.htmlExigeExcelCan comeone enlighten me as to whether the drivers keep the same tyres for Sat and Sun, or just Sun, or just the race?
Another thing I noticed was they said the tyres couldn't be changed unless there was either a puncture or a serious safety concern. Will slicks in standing water count as a severe safety concern?
Either way the qualifying was entertaining, but massa being the most![]()
Saturday qualifying order is determined by the finishing positions of the last race.ExigeExcelThere is a friday session that determines who goes out first/last on Saturday just like last season.
daanObviously, they've never heard of ctrl C and ctrl V
Tyres
Drivers will have access to far fewer tyres in 2005 and will have to make a single set last through both qualifying sessions and the entire race. A tyre can only be changed during this time if it is punctured or damaged.
Here we go... not. Ralphie has engine trouble? Maybe is was just a little bit too much oil built up during the start. Great, a start on cold tires and hot engines. It's going to be an interesting start to the new season.FatAssBRThe race will start in a few minutes, I´m off to my room now. Gotta watch it.![]()
That could be debated, the McLarens pace was better but Fisi was qualified very well. Alonso did put in a very impressive drive though. It should also be noted that Montoya has HORRIBLE tire wearVashTheStampedeThe McLarens looked good, but nowhere near as good as the Renaults.
This weather was horrible, it would be very unlikely if a session was messed up that much again this season. But I think it made for a very good race. 👍 I also think it's a bit early to think about changing the rules, what happened yesterday is not a ood indication of how the rules "should" work, I think in most other races they'll be just fine - but when mixups like this do happen it certainly makes it a very entertaining race.VashTheStampedeI'd have to agree about the results of this race and how they probably won't happen often. Though I could see them happening again if similar circumstances come up, ie rain in qualifying.
Yes, the stops are basically foolproof but when you think of how much the teams drill pit-stops they were always basically foolproof. There was alot that could go wrong but it rarely did.VashTheStampedeYes there was "a lot" going on in the pits. But the stops were very boring. Now the stops are basically foolproof and don't require a whole lot of work.
Yes, that's what I was thinking, it would be kind of stupid if the engine rule was in "sets" of races. And it's really kind of dissapointing that Ferrari could do what they did and change an engine for qualifying and incure a penalty that really had no impact on their race. They were just taking advantage of the rules but maybe they should implement some sort of rule that would make changing an engine like that a bigger dissadvantage.VashTheStampedeI would say that if they did like Schumacher, then I would think it would have to go to Bahrain also. I don't see how they could go ahead and get to use a new engine after having just put in a new one and not having it last two races, even though it would normally have to. Unless there is some kind of loophole and the engine rule goes in sets of two races, ie Australia and Malaysia are a set.