stupid rant......... Get off our backs!.............
ever notice how defensive you are? (i generally mean americans here, but for the sake of not painting everyone with the same brush i'll stick to you.) ever wonder why? you keep telling yourselves youre the best thing since cubed sugar and when the truth hits you you dont know how to handle it. well, grow up. truth doesnt taste so bad.
theres plenty of cars in american car folklore that were "great" cars. but look under the skin a little and most of them were cheaply made. get this frame, get that engine, put new body work, call it a whole new model. ford mustang. ford explorer, chevy impala, the list is endless. this is how cars are made for decades. the mustang just got replaced recently, and was based on a frame from a 78 fairlane or something. hell, the ford ranger is still on sale. since 93 withotu a major revision or update. and thats typical. there are few ground up new cars in american history. and this is really the downfall IMO.
corvair was ground up. focus too. C5 vette. GMT800 trucks. and a few more. more recently theres been a lot more models. but thats because the big two and half have been getting thier ass handed to them by superior product from the imports.
lets give an example here. did ford really think the ford windstar through when chrysler held 60% of the market? or GM and their dustbuster vans? even more recent ones? honda had a mistep with thier first gen odyssey and came out swinging with the second. same with toyota who first brought an asian market mid engined box/ panel van, then the previa, then and small first gen sienna before getting it right. the japanese refine and improve or get out. the americans dress it up and market it afresh. well, the emperor has been caught with his new clothes.
unfortunately the long held corporate culture of short term fat profits has become the achilles heel. just 20 years ago gm had a good 40% of the market. just 10, ford was the most profitable carmaker on the planet before jac nasser was appointed chief. chrysler had a $3billion war chest when they got bought out. yet history will show that the market turned on them. why? because the public was offered a better product.
do you think lexus didnt have a positive impact on toyota sales? taught mercedes a few things too. and mercedes had the market cornered on quality until they arrived. look up the first few JDPower and associates polls and results. you think honda just showed up out of nowhere? you think the bias is for japanese and against american cars?
tell that to isuzu who havent sold a car here in a decade. or to mitsubishi who are thinking of pulling out. perhaps you think the french pulled out of the american market to thumb their noses at us. or maybe vws dwindling sales arent due to the electrical gremlins theyve been seemingly plagued with the last decade or so.
open your eyes, read a little, stop being naive. in this car industry, product sells itself. i know "ford people" and "GM people" who own imports and are waiting for good product from thier respective car companies. but even they see the writing on the wall. whats so special about you?
you will find i think very poorly of mercedes products that were designed and engineered after the debut of lexus. i'll be the first person to tell you not to buy a benz made after 1995.
i think japanese cars are boring and dull appliances for the most part, a few cars aside. (NSX, skyline, 240Z, lancer, 22B, 2000GT etc)
the recent BMWs are an affront to all vision enabled people. an insult to our sense of vision.
so before you get on your high horse, try to see the forest before you ride into a tree. especially one that will back up its talk.