- 2,385
- Retired to a padded cell
- GTP_Padded_Cell
- Microsoft sucks..
I have wondered how good the calculators are and I have decided to test them when I get some time and motivation to do it. I will choose a car, apply different tunes and compare; both speed and feel.
I will test:
1. A close to stock setup
2. A "Generic" tune
3. default values tune
4. calculator built tunes
5. A hand built tune
Agreed, good idea - but some variables you need to consider:
1) Are you testing online or offline (if online - free run or race)
2) I'm sorry, but 1 car is not reflective, many of there "calculators" are sort of generic, they're desgined to help guys setup many cars "quicker" with a basic setup than norma tuning.
Judging these on one car is a little unfair - there's no way a "calculator" tune is going to beat "experience".
3) It's not just about lap time, it's about how a car feels, how well balanced it is generally, tyre wear too.
Here's an example:
Some friends were in a 6500p "GT" class, they were using their own setups, they then dialled in a setup using weight distribution.
They were about 1 sec per lap slower at first, but throughout the tyre "life" they were more consistent in their lap times and made less mistakes.
So, in fact, they ended up faster overall albiet being slower at the start.
Setups are very subjective and what's "good" about a setup can vary hugely, depending on many variables - i.e. the needs of wants of the driver, online (free run or race) /offline, what track, race distance, driving style, steering sensitivty settings etc etc etc
Either way, best of luck with your experiment 👍
Not knocking you, just trying to help you get some results that are valid and accurate and not ones that leave you open to getting shot to pieces, that's all.
Good luck and well done for trying / doing this 👍
H