- 11,832
- Marin County
That would be a pretty funny deal
The point of bringing those up is they are low production cars on purpose, just like the BT62 is and they came from investment ventures. I wouldn't compare Brabham to Pagani or Koenigsegg, because it's not established. I name that was associated with Formula 1 nearly 30 years ago isn't enough, especially when there probably isn't too many in the market that know or care about that. They want to know the car is well built, will do the job it claims, and do so better than others to a point that it will resale based on it.
Right now Brabham is on the same level as most of those I named, and really my point in naming those was to show that many groups start with the use of a sourced mainstream engine. So it wouldn't surprise me if Brabham did as well. But again I feel it is still early days and a lot could go wrong with this outing. Lotus too thought they could sale off a former F1 name even bigger than Brabham.
I agree with your assessment. My take from Brabham being cagey about the engine is to avoid the fate of those others and strive for something more. They had me at 700hp n/a V8 with velocity stacks, so I'm rooting for their success. It's actually quite clever...they can be cagey about the engine and claim it's bespoke, but not have to worry about the sort of issues wheeler-era TVR or Esprit V8-era Lotus did.