- 28,470
- Windsor, Ontario, Canada
- Johnnypenso
When is the next vote scheduled and how was this brought about by random comments on GTP?No it isn't.
When is the next vote scheduled and how was this brought about by random comments on GTP?No it isn't.
What constitutes welfare?
Who said the opinions of the people who voted on the losing side are irrelevant? You should be quoting the person that said that instead of me.
Fortunately your opinion is completely irrelevant since the votes have been cast and the decision made. It's all just crying in your beer now.
No one said it had anything to do with random comments on GTP. It has more to do with being a citizen of the UK.When is the next vote scheduled and how was this brought about by random comments on GTP?
Incapacity, disability & injury benefits
Unemployment benefits
Housing benefits
Family benefits, income support & tax credits
Personal social services and other benefits
and confusingly, Pensions.
View attachment 738026
What are you talking about?When is the next vote scheduled and how was this brought about by random comments on GTP?
People might have other opinions
Generally people like me that receive none of this benefit, but have to help fund it, might have other opinions
Incapacity, disability & injury benefits
Unemployment benefits
Housing benefits
Family benefits, income support & tax credits
Personal social services and other benefits
and confusingly, Pensions.
View attachment 738026
Not in the slightest.These two statements are at odds with each other.
So only citizens opinions count here on GTP? Do all the other non-citizens commenting on this topic know this? Are you the official arbiter of opinions here or is it just my opinion you're trying to marginalize?No one said it had anything to do with random comments on GTP. It has more to do with being a citizen of the UK.
I don't think opinions expressed here on GTP have had anything to do with that but I could be wrong.What are you talking about?
Since when are any decisions made in Parliament final and never to be argued for or against afterward?
I don't think opinions expressed here on GTP have had anything to do with that but I could be wrong.
I'm one that doesn't get the benefit and pays for it through taxes.
I don't have a single issue with it.
I do have a friend with ms who was very lucky she has these options and even then struggle to make ends meat from time to time.
And a friend who didn't get the benefit having epp and thus beeing ****ed up lucky his mother can pay for his treatment that's way to expensive which now finally after 8 years is going to payed back mostly from now on.
My friends wouldn't have a descent standard of living if it weren't for the net. So why is it bad to do with a little less as to make sure people we care about can have a descent living standard?
One thing to look forward too, by the time the next generation is pension age, they won't be getting one from the state!
Depressingly, the likelihood of a second Scottish independence referendum seems very high, though that is largely thanks to the Brexit vote.When is the next vote scheduled and how was this brought about by random comments on GTP?
Not in the slightest.
You perhaps need to read the link again where they discuss voters on both sides' reaction to the outcome of the vote and their misgivings towards the future. It was posted in response to your question. I've no idea what this has to do with being an official arbiter of opinions. All I've said is that if voters' opinions don't count, then non voters' opinions count even less with regard to Brexit.So only citizens opinions count here on GTP? Do all the other non-citizens commenting on this topic know this? Are you the official arbiter of opinions here or is it just my opinion you're trying to marginalize?
That's not even funny. It's too likely for that. There will be a general election first though. The government has to have a customs deal with the EU for NI to have a seamless border, the right wing won't tolerate that so they'll lose the Unionists.Depressingly, the likelihood of a second Scottish independence referendum seems very high, though that is largely thanks to the Brexit vote.
Funnily enough, however, I would hazard a guess that the SNP (Scottish Nationalists, currently in power in Scotland) will press ahead with a second independence referendum even if there were to be a second EU referendum that reverses Brexit. So we could end up with a bizarre situation where both referendums are held twice, producing all four potential outcomes (NO and YES to Scottish independence, LEAVE and REMAIN in the EU) and where the potentially redundant first EU referendum result (Leave) was used as a pretext to overturn the first Scottish independence referendum result, which could have the ridiculously self-defeating outcome of forcing Scotland out of the EU (while the rest of the UK stays in), which was the very reason given by the SNP for a second independence referendum!
Mark my words - you heard it here first! I think if both referendums were re-run and both produce a new result, then surely the universal 'Best Of Three' law should apply...That's not even funny. It's too likely for that.
That's not even funny. It's too likely for that. There will be a general election first though.
Mark my words - you heard it here first! I think if both referendums were re-run and both produce a new result, then surely the universal 'Best Of Three' law should apply...
For me, the best possible outcome for the UK now looks extremely remote - full single market access, membership of the customs union, no hard border in Ireland, no border (hard or otherwise) between England and Scotland, a common UK currency (the pound), non-adoption of the Euro and no Eurozone membership... it's ridiculous to think how hard all of this would be to agree to and implement if it didn't already exist!
I made a bet with my mum (who voted to leave) that if we did leave, within the following 10 years not only would we be back within the EU, but we'd have been forced to adopt the Euro.
No. But has there been much of that this century?Jeremy Corbyn commits to abolishing House of Lords - The Independent https://apple.news/AXWJ4pdlxSvy1yhSMx9dIeQ
Is there now no logic and reason allowed in the commons now?!
I don’t know... there has been stupidity and then there has been the current Labour Party... they could dominate the Tories who are basically the worst party in power that I know off... and they do what? That’s right implode, run by a man who’s clueless and who continues to only further highlight just how clueless he is...No. But has there been much of that this century?
The Lords does fulfill an important role. Because it is not elected it shouldn't bow to public opinion.
As long as the Commons always has the final say then nothing is wrong with it. As long as you fill it with worthy people and not a bunch of ancient duffers with a nice house and extensive gardens that is.
The stance ‘I might be a racist, but I’m no druggie’ is something I wouldn’t have put money on seeing as someone so public’s defence!So the ever charming Katie Hopkins has won her press complaint agains the Daily Mirror for saying she was arrested in South Africa for taking ketamine.
The retraction they published pretty much explains the rest (and my own deep joy at the whole thing).
"A previous version of this article suggested that Katie Hopkins was stopped from leaving South Africa because of the consumption of Ketamine. We are happy to clarify that Ms Hopkins was detained for spreading racial hatred, which took place after the Ketamine incident."
https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/katie-hopkins-detained-south-africa-11977548
While I feel bad that Hopkins's epilepsy is serious enough to warrant her ingesting horse tranquilizer to combat the symptoms, but that was a hilarious update.So the ever charming Katie Hopkins has won her press complaint agains the Daily Mirror for saying she was arrested in South Africa for taking ketamine.
The retraction they published pretty much explains the rest (and my own deep joy at the whole thing).
"A previous version of this article suggested that Katie Hopkins was stopped from leaving South Africa because of the consumption of Ketamine. We are happy to clarify that Ms Hopkins was detained for spreading racial hatred, which took place after the Ketamine incident."
https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/katie-hopkins-detained-south-africa-11977548
The Ketamine was for a shoulder injury not the epilepsy, which I believe she had surgery to resolve a few years ago.While I feel bad that Hopkins's epilepsy is serious enough to warrant her ingesting horse tranquilizer to combat the symptoms, but that was a hilarious update.
While I feel bad that Hopkins's epilepsy is serious enough to warrant her ingesting horse tranquilizer to combat the symptoms, but that was a hilarious update.
While I feel bad that Hopkins's epilepsy is serious enough to warrant her ingesting horse tranquilizer to combat the symptoms, but that was a hilarious update.
An injury she sustained after falling at the 5th at Aintree...The Ketamine was for a shoulder injury not the epilepsy, which I believe she had surgery to resolve a few years ago.
Epilepsy was recorded as saying: "The surgery was a huge success and we can now live our lives free from this blight."The Ketamine was for a shoulder injury not the epilepsy, which I believe she had surgery to resolve a few years ago.