- 29,952
- Bratvegas
- GTP_Liquid
Chaos with Ed Milliband.She’s a froot loop for sure.
At this point I’m thinking we may be better off of Diane Abbott was running the country.
Chaos with Ed Milliband.She’s a froot loop for sure.
At this point I’m thinking we may be better off of Diane Abbott was running the country.
If the average income household is paying anything like double their monthly income for energy this winter, then your government should indeed be faced with sharp rebuke and earnest protest.Granted, it was a Sun headline, but I saw something about "Lord" Frost being made head of the cabinet if Truss gets in.
All I'm going to say, is that in between scrolling cat videos and thinking "awwwwwwww", I saw this and thought, "I wonder if anyone will start executing politicians anytime soon...", or at least, that's the closest AUP friendly version.
Anyhow...
Kittens.
Sharp rebuke? I was wondering if anyone would use a 50 cal., personally. There is no earnest, good faith, above the board protest that will stop this systemic rot.your government should indeed be faced with sharp rebuke and earnest protest.
Think it’s about time we use this as our motto in the UKFrost is the same unelected boofhead who wants to exterminate Wales and Scotland by abolishing devolution in Cardiff and Edinburgh, and confirming thatthe United KingdomEngland is a unitary state.
The island is ****ed.
You will go meekly, like lambs to the slaughter. But, as always, you will be tasteful, witty and amusing as you go along.Sharp rebuke? I was wondering if anyone would use a 50 cal., personally. There is no earnest, good faith, above the board protest that will stop this systemic rot.
Please stop with your nonsense.You will go meekly, like lambs to the slaughter. But, as always, you will be tasteful, witty and amusing as you go along.
Since when has the character of your people changed? Haven't you always believed government is better than the alternative, and that more government, not less, is the only thing that can solve your problems?Please stop with your nonsense.
It was vaguely amusing in its inaccuracy the first few thousand times, now it's just embarrassingly moronic ********.
It adds nothing to the discussion past re-enforcing your lack of knowledge and understanding, note this is not moderation (being consistently wrong isn't an AUP violation), more care in the community. Can we have more consideration and less peak-Boomer in your posts, please?
Doubling down doesn't suddenly make you right.Since when has the character of your people changed? Haven't you always believed government is better than the alternative, and that more government, not less, is the only thing that can solve your problems?
Haven't you always believed government is better than the alternative, and that more government, not less, is the only thing that can solve your problems?
Tell me you know nothing about the UK without telling me you know nothing about the UK.Since when has the character of your people changed? Haven't you always believed government is better than the alternative, and that more government, not less, is the only thing that can solve your problems?
Current industrial actionsDotini - I've always thought that the British people and nation were the greatest on Earth, probably since the time of Edward. It seems entirely unlikely that violence and other antisocial and antidemocratic activity is your destiny. Probably the worst thing you shackle yourselves with is a blind slavery to US policy
Once again spouting nonsense based on some bizarre, and utterly unrealistic view of the UK that you seem to have.I've always thought that the British people and nation were the greatest on Earth, probably since the time of Edward. It seems entirely unlikely that violence and other antisocial and antidemocratic activity is your destiny. Probably the worst thing you shackle yourselves with is a blind slavery to US policy.
The Edward I referred to was of course Edward Longshanks. I've studied the "Peasant's" Revolt in some detail, and admire it greatly.Once again spouting nonsense based on some bizarre, and utterly unrealistic view of the UK that you seem to have.
Being wrong about it initially is understandable, being told you are wrong repeatedly and continuing to try and argue it, is wilful ignorance of the highest order.
The concept of civil disobedience as a form of protest is both well ingrained within the UK (and a wider Europe) and arguably something that was imported to the US from Europe, not the other way around.
After all it's not as if the Sacheverell riots of 1710 and similar events lead to the introduction of the Riot act in the UK in 1715, sixty years before the US even existed. Or do I need to point out the Civil war we had a good 200 years before the US one, or the Glorious Revolution of 1688, or maybe the Peasant's Revolt of 1381 is far enough back for you (the first time a Poll tax was attempted in the UK, the second time had much the same result, in 1990)?
What exactly will it require for you to stop this continued line of inane ********?
I mean the line "since the time of Edward" further illustrates this, which Edward is that exactly? The son of Alfred, Edward the Martyr, the Confessor, what about Longshanks, or maybe it's Balliol the pretender to the crown of Scotland in the 14thC, or then we have numbers 2, 3 or 4, not to forget the black Prince? That by the way is far from a complete list of notable Edwards from the history of the UK, you may of well have said "since the time of Dave" it would have had about as much actual accuracy and relevance. Quit trying to look smart, it's backfiring spectacularly, and start to actually research and cite your future musings.
Sacheverell riots - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgGlorious Revolution - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgEnglish Civil War - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgPeasants' Revolt - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgEdward - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
So you now acknowledge you were talking nonsense, odd, you're flipflopping now.The Edward I referred to was of course Edward Longshanks. I've studied the "Peasant's" Revolt in some detail, and admire it greatly.
Which bit of US policy does the UK have to adhere to exactly?And I reiterate the problems you face today are exacerbated by your excessive adherence to US policy.
I admire Edward mostly because he was the least mentally, emotionally and physically damaged English King that I know of. Wikipedia has a long list of his achievements. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_I_of_EnglandSo you now acknowledge you were talking nonsense, odd, you're flipflopping now.
Oh and it was anything but obvious, but I guess adding in 'the First' or 'Longshanks' is beneath you and we should , of course, be able to read your mind. Out of interest what exactly was it about Edward the First that drives the admiration?
Which bit of US policy does the UK have to adhere to exactly?
You really, really didn't read that did you.I admire Edward mostly because he was the least mentally, emotionally and physically damaged English King that I know of. Wikipedia has a long list of his achievements. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_I_of_England
Doesn't answer the question, try again, this time without a strawman or quote mining.The US policy you should be most wary of is foreign policy. It's costing you way too much
Yep, old Ed made a great omelette. But he broke a few eggs. Old Abe Lincoln had to do a few nasty things in his time, too.You really, really didn't read that did you.
So to be clear you admire a man who:
That's who you admire, rather you than me.
- Subjugated Scotland, causing it to side with England enemy, stole the Stone of Destiny stone leading to English and Scottish animosity that continued late into the last century. Imprisoned its leaders and massacred it's people.
- Ditto Wales (minus the Stone)
- Consolidated power on himself
- Engaged in countless military actions that raised taxes and bankrupted the country
- Executed 300 Jews (who he personally 'owned') as they were no longer financially useful
- Banned Jews from lending money, attempted forced conversions and when that didn't work expelled all Jews from English lands (which included Scotland and Wales, which he'd stolen).
Doesn't answer the question, try again, this time without a strawman or quote mining.
And we are back to avoidance.Yep, old Ed made a great omelette. But he broke a few eggs. Old Abe Lincoln had to do a few nasty things in his time, too.
Well he does admire an anti-Semite...Equating the execution of marginalized people to "breaking a few eggs" is frankly despicable.
Maybe he'll bother the Aussies instead. /freestylinIf I have to ban a user from a third thread...
My man, you need to stop the smug, condescending, "aren't they adorable trying to figure things out for themselves", wise old all-knowing American cosplay attitude. With immediate effect. You sound like a moron.Since when has the character of your people changed? Haven't you always believed government is better than the alternative, and that more government, not less, is the only thing that can solve your problems?
Okay. Perhaps the character of your people has changed for the better, and you should move toward less government, more freedom and individual responsibility. Welcome to reality, it feels great!My man, you need to stop the smug, condescending, "aren't they adorable trying to figure things out for themselves", wise old all-knowing American cosplay attitude. With immediate effect. You sound like a moron.
And that makes the triple.Okay. Perhaps the character of your people has changed for the better, and you should move toward less government, more freedom and individual responsibility. Welcome to reality, it feels great!