Doesn't it seem profoundly apocalyptic that a nation, society and economy leant against the notion of perpetual economic growth should result in a situation where normal people should have to scale back their energy use for the sake of pocket-lining executives taking the world on a speculative ride in order to profit from tragedy?
Personally I would find the suggestion too cruel to leave my mouth. Our money laundering economy constantly grows - energy use grows over time, in step with the progress of technology, everything in theory should tick away and work and even if the monetary value of our bills go up we are supposed to make more money to cover that.
Again, this is not the hill I would die on, but there's an element of responsibility that falls on us as individuals to make sure our lifestyles are sustainable to a given degree. Sure, whilst energy is cheap and plentiful we enjoy the good times, but it's now clear - energy profits aside - that as a society the basis of cheap and plentiful energy hasn't evolved in a sustainable way. This should be a wake-up call not only to us as individuals that what we consider the basic standard, is actually a comfortable standard, but also to our government to make sure that we're in control of such fundamental infrastructure if we aim to be a nation able to stand alone.
Our collective need for power as a society may have grown in step with the progress of technology, but that's a house built on sand if our own domestically controlled power generation capability hasn't also grown - I'd go so far as to suggest it should be fairly well decentralised too. For something that has become so fundamental to our way of life, anything other than generation surplus and grid redundancy seems bonkers, and yet here we are.
Nationalised nuclear plants in the shape of the Union flag NOW
Hence, I agree with this. A surplus of energy will drive prices down, and redundant generation and infrastructure will cost money... it's not going to be done by corporations. The government has to step up.
But at the same time.... we as individuals need to accept that what we actually need in order to live reasonably well, is not necessarily as comfortable as what we're used to.
Maybe I am being unsympathetic, living a life in desperate misery (i.e. working) in order to pay a massive amount for certain basic needs (i.e. renting shelter) has been normalised in our modern society, perhaps I'm just surprised people are quibbling about another basic need that's relatively a lot more accessible, much cheaper, and easier to control the cost of, when the average house price these days is
two-hundred and eight five thousand effing pounds.