Look what I found! http://www.lifestyle-bugatti.com/en/bugatti-vision-gt.html/
€59 for a cap? Are they on crack?
Look what I found! http://www.lifestyle-bugatti.com/en/bugatti-vision-gt.html/
€59 for a cap? Are they on crack?
And you know the fashion brand rule: 5% Actual Production Cost, 95% Brand slap cost.It's Bugatti, they could charge €1 billion for a cap and the schmucks would still lap it up.
And you know the fashion brand rule: 5% Actual Production Cost, 95% Brand slap cost.
That's the point of exclusivity, it's meant to not be for everyone.I was flicking through their range and saw a leather jacket just like mine, just with the zip pockets at a slightly different angle.
The main difference is that mine only cost about 1/100th of the price. Ridiculous.
The bugatti VGT is a racecar chiron, not a veyron.I actually know how to drive a veyron. I used to open 'ring rooms where we would run across the track in supercars, and I almost always won because of its stupidly fast acceleration. Thing is, 90% of players don't know how to drive it.
Lastly, why should I drive a veyron in real life? The bugatti VGT is fictional isn't it?
1. I didn't mention the VGT at all in that postThe bugatti VGT is a racecar chiron, not a veyron.
Why exactly do you think no one should care?
Also, this isn't a "Racecar Veyron", its a Vision GT based on the upcoming Chiron.
1. I didn't mention the VGT at all in that post
2. I have already been told that.
Why does everyone care about it so much? The actual veyron is bad, and this is just a racecar veyron.
Case closed.
The Bugatti VGT isn't a Chiron at all, it just resembles one, kind of.The bugatti VGT is a racecar chiron, not a veyron.
It is a Chiron, it's just at the time the Chiron didn't officially "exist" so it was called a "preview of the company's future"The Bugatti VGT isn't a Chiron at all, it just resembles one, kind of.
I get it now. I just thought it resembled it and that was it.It is a Chiron, it's just at the time the Chiron didn't officially "exist" so it was called a "preview of the company's future"
I responded to tell @dinosaur202 that I had already been told that, sorry for any confusionI responded to this:
Which I then responded and explained it isn't (which has since been further confirmed). Considering this thread was about this car, what else were you reffering to? The time I made that post, I wasn't aware everyone else called you out on it so it wasn't as if I was intentionally pilling on unnecessary post. I don't even get why you're just now responding, I thought we were done with this.