buick 62 special set up

  • Thread starter 747 wagon
  • 9 comments
  • 4,609 views
this set up was tuned and tested on infineon stock car course my best time is a 1.04.743

'62 buick special
Power: 809hp


Parts to buy:

standard exhuast
Sports ECU
supercharger
racind suspension
full tansmission
triple clutch
racing clutch
carbon firber tailshaft
racing supersoft
racind brakes
balance controller
nitrous (50)

Settings:

Spring rate: 15.0/15.0
Ride height: 78/78
Shock bound: 10/10
Shock rebound: 10/10
Camber angle: 3.0/1.8
Toe angle: 0.0/0.0
Stabilizers: 7/7

LSD Setting:
default

Brake ballance: 24/20

TCS: 8
Both ASM: 10

Downforce: Na

Ballast:
weight: 102
front/back: 20

GEARBOX:manual

1ST:3.177
2ND:2.028
3RD:1.434
4TH:1.064
5TH:0.837
6TH:0.690
FINAL:3.445
AUTO:18

all comments are welcome it's a pretty good setup may need a few tweeks to suit your driving.
 
*coughs*

Ahem, aids my friend? Stock tires any you're adding in power to a 500hp car?

Bet a car with stock power will beat this aids off V. aids off. (Heck, I'll let this one have the TCS and ASM. Especially ASM so that it's so deplorably slow through corners that a VEE-TEK can beat it.
 
*coughs*

Ahem, aids my friend? Stock tires any you're adding in power to a 500hp car?

Bet a car with stock power will beat this aids off V. aids off. (Heck, I'll let this one have the TCS and ASM. Especially ASM so that it's so deplorably slow through corners that a VEE-TEK can beat it.

*coughs*
*coughs*

what r u going on about stock tires well i never said u had to do everything it said

if it makes u happy turn the aids off and it makes u feel big keep bagging the **** out of it (HECK, I DON'T CARE)
 
Oh, now I see it : "racing supersoft"

In that case, WHY DO YOU HAVE AIDS ON?

Aids are never a good thing. The only aid I will ever use is traction control, and I've been doing my best to stay away from it. (Let's just say that my 787B doesn't need it)

y r u typin liek dis?

It is a violation of the AUP.

Still bet I can beat this with a stick. I'll use a Vette Z06 with R5s and nothing else. You keep this as is.

Track should be something small with a few long corners. Autumn Ring full sounds good. That way I can gain about 2 full seconds per corner on you.

ATM, I can't do this, as I just started over and am redoing the licenses. However, I think my point is clear.

I'd suggest to at least TRY to improve your driving (turn the effing aids off already!), then your tuning.

Just from the way that you responded to that, I'm going to assume that you gamesharked all golds on the licenses, full $$, and bash the AI out of your way. Since you do every race with a completely overkill car you consider yourself a good driver because you win every time.

But hey, you might actually take this seriously. I don't see it.
 
Oh, now I see it : "racing supersoft"

In that case, WHY DO YOU HAVE AIDS ON?

Aids are never a good thing. The only aid I will ever use is traction control, and I've been doing my best to stay away from it. (Let's just say that my 787B doesn't need it)

y r u typin liek dis?

It is a violation of the AUP.

Still bet I can beat this with a stick. I'll use a Vette Z06 with R5s and nothing else. You keep this as is.

Track should be something small with a few long corners. Autumn Ring full sounds good. That way I can gain about 2 full seconds per corner on you.

ATM, I can't do this, as I just started over and am redoing the licenses. However, I think my point is clear.

I'd suggest to at least TRY to improve your driving (turn the effing aids off already!), then your tuning.

Just from the way that you responded to that, I'm going to assume that you gamesharked all golds on the licenses, full $$, and bash the AI out of your way. Since you do every race with a completely overkill car you consider yourself a good driver because you win every time.

But hey, you might actually take this seriously. I don't see it.

just 2 let u know i'm 16 and ur proberly a person in there late 20's that has no life but 2 sit on a ps2 all day but i can't judge u through a website and a couple of comments
 
If you do not start typing properly, you will receive an infraction or a warning from the moderating staff. You are violating the terms you agreed to when signing up for these forums, most specifically, this part of them:
Acceptable Use Policy
No slang words that promote laziness, ie; "r", "u", "plz", etc. will be tolerated. Decent grammar is expected, including proper usage of capital letters. Repeated violations will be grounds for suspension and/or permanent removal from the forums.

I think this part applies to the whole thread:
Acceptable Use Policy
You will not behave in an abusive and/or hateful manner, and will not harrass, threaten, nor attack anyone or any group. There will be no racially, sexually or physically abusive or inciteful language tolerated. Any abusive comments made by members will be removed by the Moderating staff and the user issued with a warning or banned, as deemed appropriate by the Moderating staff. No personal attacks on other members will be tolerated. If you question someone, it must be done in a reasonable and semi-friendly manner. Violating this rule will be grounds for suspension and/or permanent removal from the board.
Both of you, cool it. Rotary, you're being quite aggressive and provocative as well in my opinion.

This is probably the friendliest warning you're going to get, 747 wagon, and it comes from someone younger than yourself.

DE
 
747: I can safely say that I am younger than you by two years. And, no, I have no life. I feed off others. :lol:

I'm utterly hostile to people with "New Member" tags who are typing like that, resurrecting threads, etc.

Harsh welcomes are the norm from me. Just because everyone is guilty until proven innocent.

DE: I am aggressive and provocative. I really do need to try to keep it in check.

But I wouldn't doubt that 747 (who is viewing this thread ATM) is going to flame me by saying something to the effect of "OMG, u hav no life!", but, hry, you never know, I could be wrong.

I really don't care about what other people think of me, so flaming falls on mostly deaf ears.

EDIT: Must've scared him off. Whoops.
 
747: I can safely say that I am younger than you by two years. And, no, I have no life. I feed off others. :lol:

I'm utterly hostile to people with "New Member" tags who are typing like that, resurrecting threads, etc.

Harsh welcomes are the norm from me. Just because everyone is guilty until proven innocent.

DE: I am aggressive and provocative. I really do need to try to keep it in check.

But I wouldn't doubt that 747 (who is viewing this thread ATM) is going to flame me by saying something to the effect of "OMG, u hav no life!", but, hry, you never know, I could be wrong.

I really don't care about what other people think of me, so flaming falls on mostly deaf ears.

EDIT: Must've scared him off. Whoops.


well i don't talk 2 wankers so you win HAPPY:D
 
Oh, tossing insults?

O_o, I'm SOOO scared.

Shaking in my boots.

I love it when people start flaming when they get told something that goes against their "I > ALLL!!!!!11oneeleventyone" mindset.

As I can clearly see that you do not plan on being a contributing member of this society, I'd prefer that you left. For good.

Sorry, but again I don't see you as a contributing member. I give the same speech on aids every time I see them, you took objection and are now pissed off that someone doesn't love your setup. Wouldn't be the first time someone got spooked away from the site. Or simply didn't follow the rules. Look at the ban log for reference.

I'm really truly sorry that you have decided to flame others rather than listen to advice.
 
Both of you would be well-advised to listen to what Dark Elite said.

I’ll be nice and not issue any infractions, on the condition that you leave each other alone. And 747 wagon, please use proper grammar and spelling, and calling someone a “wanker” isn’t appropriate here.
 
Back