- 4,543
- Bay Area, CA
- Zenith113
snip
I agree, it's not the most heroic justice, but it's the correct one.
snip
Jalopnik[\url]The original Camaro Z/28 was designed as a race car first and a road car second. The 2014 Camaro Z/28 is a road car, but it will be hitting the track. And its first race is Friday.
Chevrolet says that the Camaro Z/28.R is almost totally production based, running the same LS7 V8 as in the Z/28 road car along with aero bits like the front splitter, rear spoiler, hood extractor, belly pan, and the rockers and front tire deflectors.
Chevy Camaro Z/28.R: The Pony Car Racer Is Back And It's Badass
This is a real stock car as far as Chevy is concerned, with numerous components shared with the stock, road-going Z/28. The only changes are to an endurance spec suspension and series-mandated safety equipment. Not that it's a miracle that cars like this exist, Porsche has been doing it for ages. It's just great to have the Z/28 name back on track.
Chevy Camaro Z/28.R: The Pony Car Racer Is Back And It's Badass
The Z/28.R will run in the GS class of the IMSA Continental Tire SportsCar Challenge, which has its first race this Friday at Daytona.
EDIT: Plus, since I'm a fan of modifying my cars, the GT-R has an enormous amount of aftermarket support. Especially high-end Japanese brands which develop race-oriented parts for the car.
Bro do you even LS?
If 4/10 of a second is really that important to you, put R-comps on your GT-R and murk that Z/28. I know which car I'd rather have.
@YSSMAN Honestly, as impressive as the Z/28 is, I still can't think of anyone besides collectors who would want to buy it.
People who want a track monster aren't going to want to deal with the insane weight and dated Zeta chassis.
People who want a Z/28 or special Camaro to drive around won't be happy with losing so many luxuries and the race suspension.
This is the closest I've seen a Camaro get to that special kind of supercar that only exists to make a company look good, but in reality is pretty much useless to the owner. A sort of super-halo car.
It's on my list for the RX7! Nonetheless, the fact that this would probably be a hardcore Camaro guy's first response goes to show that they still think the engine is the most important piece of technology. Murica.Bro do you even LS?
It's on my list for the RX7! Nonetheless, the fact that this would probably be a hardcore Camaro guy's first response goes to show that they still think the engine is the most important piece of technology. Murica.
Hiding a car's shortcomings with stickier tires is commonplace in the world of amateur sports driving, whether it be canyon roads or track days, often autocross. Any sort of sporty driving that doesn't require the car to be at the limit all the time through lack of competition and skill leaves a gap where drivers don't actually know how the car performs at the limit. All they know is the R-comps make it stick really hard and it feels pretty damn fast. The phrase, "It's on rails" is your first clue that somebody is compensating.
EDIT: Just wait til they start comparing the new GT500 to the Z/28. OMG the Z/28 is two seconds a lap faster than the GT500! Ford sucks! Yeah except that it's a fully fledged road car, even more composed and acceptable than the GT-R, and no more expensive than a Z/28.
You're right actually, the ZL1 would be a better comparison because it has cupholders, a stereo, and is actually desirable to anybody who might be looking at a GT-R or GT500. Comparing the Z/28 to a GT-R doesn't prove anything except that GM tried really hard to make a hella badass Camaro for the track and still barely beat a pure street car, despite tires you can barely use in the rain.Also I don't see why they would make a serious comparison between the GT500 and Z/28 since they really aren't in the same class package
>lolmuricancarscantturnI quite like the Z/28. It doesn't exactly make sense...but it would be hard to deny that it doesn't do it's job well, and it's pretty cool. A Camaro that's faster than a 911 Turbo around a track.. Pretty remarkable.
You're right actually, the ZL1 would be a better comparison because it has cupholders, a stereo, and is actually desirable to anybody who might be looking at a GT-R or GT500. Comparing the Z/28 to a GT-R doesn't prove anything except that GM tried really hard to make a hella badass Camaro for the track and still barely beat a pure street car, despite tires you can barely use in the rain.
GM did a good job at making a top tier Camaro in line with the Z/28 tradition at least the original first gen and second gen way.
Well, let's be honest here. They had to start with a platform that was nowhere near a GT-R competitor to begin with & wasn't ever meant to be; that was the big daddy 'Vette's job. The GT-R isn't something I'd call a pure street car either considering it took what, a whole decade or close to of Nurburgring testing & what not to get to the point where it was a lightning fast track car that laughed in the face of weight saving as well as a daily driver.You're right actually, the ZL1 would be a better comparison because it has cupholders, a stereo, and is actually desirable to anybody who might be looking at a GT-R or GT500. Comparing the Z/28 to a GT-R doesn't prove anything except that GM tried really hard to make a hella badass Camaro for the track and still barely beat a pure street car, despite tires you can barely use in the rain.
Depends on how you want to look at that, I think. Although the Z/28 had traditionally been the track-focused car, it was never outrageously fast nor prohibitively expensive. Thing is, when you have 45 years of marketing to worry about, the names are going to get crazy. To some extent, I wish Chevrolet would have tried a different combination of letters and numbers on this one. They've already thrown the SS/RS badges to the wind, and I think you could make an argument that they did the same with ZL1. If anything, I'd have liked the Z/28 better as the 1LE, and vice-versa. Meh.