Chevy Camaro SS '10 Challenge!

  • Thread starter KaroSVTR
  • 1,463 comments
  • 58,835 views
I've been on GTP for 2 years, been tuning since '07 if not longer
 
Gran Turismo never trusted me when I had GT4. It always broke the next 2-3 weeks everytime I got it. I stopped in 2008 when I had more fun in sports games and thought realistic sims were boring. Earlier in April I realized whatI was missing in a good simulation game: Realistic handling and awesomeness so I bought the game. I joined GTP on May 10 and it was up-and-down at the start if you know what I mean.
 
Try 5.8/5.9k 👍

You'll never get below 9.8 shifting that late

try 5.5 - 5.6 absolute latest

cuda-68-2.jpg


cuda-68-1.jpg

He must be doing something right. :lol: 👍
 
seanneedscar
Or giving out disinformation..

Festor has no need to lie. He has good morals. If you posted HERE more often you'd know that




Looking at the power band and how long my cudas gears are it makes sense between 5.75 and 5.95 (or 5.8-5.9 like feat said)
 
Festor has no need to lie. He has good morals. If you posted HERE more often you'd know that

No need to attack me. I never said he lied nor did I say anything about his morals.

But when the drag racing community gives out 'help' it is not always 100% best, for example, base tunes. And that is what I said he did.

Looking at the power band and how long my cudas gears are it makes sense between 5.75 and 5.95 (or 5.8-5.9 like feat said)

Now you are just falling into gray area! 300 rpm, big difference, thats hundredths!

Now I personally am claiming 5500-5700 to be the best. If his Cuda set that time, shifting at 5900, than festor himself can come in here, and prove me wrong. That makes it an A and B conversation, so... 👍
 
seanneedscar
No need to attack me. I never said he lied nor did I say anything about his morals.

But when the drag racing community gives out 'help' it is not always 100% best, for example, base tunes. And that is what I said he did.

Now you are just falling into gray area! 300 rpm, big difference, thats hundredths!

Now I personally am claiming 5500-5700 to be the best. If his Cuda set that time, shifting at 5900, than festor himself can come in here, and prove me wrong. That makes it an A and B conversation, so... 👍

Firstly it's 200 not 300
And it's almost impossible to get perfect on that nor is there a perfect spot between there.

And he wouldn't tell someone to shift that region to help them if he didn't do that himself.

It's not an attack but rather return of attitude
 
And it's almost impossible to get perfect on that nor is there a perfect spot between there.

Right, agreed.

Maybe this picture will better help understand where I'm coming from:

24x1mc0.jpg


I had no intent to exchange words with festor, you, or anyone else. If i gave attitude I apologize, it was not my intent. Moreover, if I'm wrong, I apologize for that too ahead of time. But as it stands I dont think I am.
 
seanneedscar
Right, agreed.

Maybe this picture will better help understand where I'm coming from:

I had no intent to exchange words with festor, you, or anyone else. If i gave attitude I apologize, it was not my intent. Moreover, if I'm wrong, I apologize for that too ahead of time. But as it stands I dont think I am.


No worries mate

2ed05908.jpg


Try in between. 👍

Give festor's shift point a go. Might work might not. But IMHO I'd be closer to festor's shift point

The only way to improve is to try new ideas :)
 
You'll never get below 9.8 shifting that late

try 5.5 - 5.6 absolute latest

Or giving out disinformation..

Well it appears to me that your theory has no more credibility than mine, or kennys!

So until festor sees this, its up in the air.

👍

No need to attack me. I never said he lied nor did I say anything about his morals.

But when the drag racing community gives out 'help' it is not always 100% best, for example, base tunes. And that is what I said he did.



Now you are just falling into gray area! 300 rpm, big difference, thats hundredths!

Now I personally am claiming 5500-5700 to be the best. If his Cuda set that time, shifting at 5900, than festor himself can come in here, and prove me wrong. That makes it an A and B conversation, so... 👍

I'm not even sure this accusation warrants a response, but just to clear things up, it was not "disinformation". I'm more than happy to concede it might not the best shift point and my shifting is poor at the best of times, but this seems to work with my tune. It was only a suggestion to try. Keeping in mind you initially said 5.5-5.6 then said 5500-5700 (which is it btw?) and I said 5800-5900 I can't believe I'm being accused of disinformation over 200 or 100 rpm smh

Thanks to everyone else for the support seeing it for what it is 👍

I don't really want to divert this great thread again so now I have cleared that up for you how about you make your submission Sean?
 
@sean- I didn't intend for this to turn into a whole topic lol. I was just pointing out the fact that with fest0rs advice the time you were claiming was not attainable was in fact possible. That is pretty much where I'm shifting at as well. Although my time isn't as fast as his, it is still in the 9.7's. Fest isn't the type of dude to steer folks wrong. In fact, if you read through this thread you'll see that most of the participants are the exact same way, offering advice-even setups to those struggling. With that being said - with all the possible combinations of settings it is very conceivable that you can achieve very similar/competitive times with different approaches. My comment wasnt meant as an attack. No hard feelings I hope. 👍

Also, there are a couple garages out there that offer top notch tunes. The setup is all there it is just for the user to fill in the blanks. This method encourages people to learn on their own while still providing an outline to build off of. 👍
 
it might not the best shift point, ... , It was only a suggestion to try

That's all I wanted to hear 👍

Keeping in mind you initially said 5.5-5.6 then said 5500-5700 (which is it btw?)

I had a moment of clarity after reading vipers post, with shifting errors 100rpm is too small a target, so I expanded it to 5.5-5.7. My mistake.

and I said 5800-5900 I can't believe I'm being accused of disinformation over 200 or 100 rpm smh

200 to 100 makes a big difference on the Cuda, atleast .010 .

I will admit I was being nitpicky, it basically came down to *Closer to 5.5* or *Closer to 6k* and I thought, 6k in a Cuda? No way. Also, my mistake.

I don't really want to divert this great thread again so now I have cleared that up for you how about you make your submission Sean?

After butchering my Indy tune for half an hour, I am retiring from this car:

I made this time, trying my best to shift at 5500 - 5700. YMMV!
 
Last edited:
So the event is over with. Just realized it... lol
Closest time i see is fest0rs. As always nice work fest!
Stay tuned guys for the next car in a cpl of days.
 
Thanks guys, but Karo still has the best time 👍

I don't mind what the new challenge car is, as long as it doesn't force me to adjust my medication like the Cuda :lol:

...and if I have it, so do all BMP members ;)
 
Nice job fest. I wanna see what car's next, like the Zonda, Camaro SS '10, or maybe the 07 premo Mustang.
 
Diahatsu Migdet Diahatsu Migdet Diahatsu Migdet Diahatsu Migdet Diahatsu Migdet Diahatsu Migdet Diahatsu Migdet
 
Back