You sound like a reasonable guy but I have a feeling that capitalism has no one guiding force that would make it evolve in the way you're talking about. As I understand it it's just buying and selling, supply and demand. I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong, though.As an American, I think some things are already sort of socialist without being bad things, like various infrastructure, or Medicare. I think a lot of people who get spooked over socialism either don't know what it is, or get freaked out at nations that aren't doing well for reasons other than socialism, like how I hear Venezuela over-centralized its economy on oil. It also doesn't help the image of socialism (and to some extent, communism as well) that the CIA has usually been mucking about, like when they overthrew the Iranian government in '53. That said, I do identify as a capitalist - but I think capitalism needs to evolve if it wants to be favored by future generations of Americans.
That's about right.You sound like a reasonable guy but I have a feeling that capitalism has no one guiding force that would make it evolve in the way you're talking about. As I understand it it's just buying and selling, supply and demand. I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong, though.
That does make it quite flexible though. Nothing stops you from buying and selling for the good of other people. Capitalism itself might not be driven to evolve but the society around it can be. I think in the US at least there is a lot of room for improvement when it comes to allowing us to help one another.You sound like a reasonable guy but I have a feeling that capitalism has no one guiding force that would make it evolve in the way you're talking about. As I understand it it's just buying and selling, supply and demand. I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong, though.
You can try and make sure your buying and selling doesn't cause harm to other people but I think people buy and sell primarily becuase of the benefit it brings to themselves. Using their wealth to help other people is charity, not capitalism. As far as I know capitalism and socialism aren't mutually exclusive.Nothing stops you from buying and selling for the good of other people.
You can try and make sure your buying and selling doesn't cause harm to other people but I think people buy and sell primarily becuase of the benefit it brings to themselves.
Charity is not capitalism, but it can drive capitalism. I definitely plan to use my money for the good of other people, and it's nothing new to me at this point. It goes hand in hand with improving things for myself.Using their wealth to help other people is charity, not capitalism. As far as I know capitalism and socialism aren't mutually exclusive.
I didn't say wealth was limited to helping yourself. I said most people buy and sell to help themselves before they think of helping others. Charity begins at home.I'm sure that's true in a lot of cases, but there is a lot that you can do with wealth. It's certainly not limited to helping yourself. All you need is some motivation to be altruistic, which isn't hard to come by.
Sorry I didn't mean to make it sound like I wasn't acknowledging that.I didn't say wealth was limited to helping yourself. I said most people buy and sell to help themselves before they think of helping others. Charity begins at home.
@Shidapu
Here is a thread where you can enlighten us about Komrad Stalin.
So, why is he not a mass murdering dictator in your eyes?
Because he was friends with George Bush, of course.
Well maybe is it because I don't have mud in them.
Here's something easy for you to get started..
The request was that you explain it, not that you defer that to a 40 minute video.Here's something easy for you to get started..
Yeah, no.
You tell me what I asked for, I'm not going to watch a 40 minute video from some obscure special Youtuber.
You're right, you don't.nothing to say
The request was that you explain it, not that you defer that to a 40 minute video.
You need to be able to explain it and articulate why, it's unreasonable to expect the other party to watch a 40 minute video with zero explanation or justification.
And stop double posting.
Murderous dictatorships aren't communism. If the video title describes its contents accurately, it doesn't address the question asked of you.I think the title of the video is self explanatory.
Except that @Dennisch didn't ask you about "every Anti-Communist argument ever," he asked you to explain, in your own words, how Stalin wasn't a dictator who orchestrated the murder of hundreds-of-thousands of his own citizens. I myself would also be curious about that.He will find the answer he wants...I think the title of the video is self explanatory.
Murderous dictatorships aren't communism. If the video title describes its contents accurately, it doesn't address the question asked of you.
Communism is a [bad] economic model. Lots of things that aren't communism are frequently ascribed to communism. Murderous dictatorships may or may not also employ communist economic policies, but the two things are separate.
Well, this is already going about as well as I expected.
Except that @Dennisch didn't ask you about "every Anti-Communist argument ever," he asked you to explain, in your own words, how Stalin wasn't a dictator who orchestrated the murder of hundreds-of-thousands of his own citizens. I myself would also be curious about that.
Regardless, dropping a 40-minute long video with nothing to really go off of and using that as your "answer" is lazy.
Low effort ****posting of which @VBR is sure to approve.You both can also watch the video...grab a beer and enjoy.
You've given us zero reasons to do so.You both can also watch the video...grab a beer and enjoy.
Since this is the thread about socialism
Great mind and great lecture.
Why don't you summarize it as opposed to making everyone take ~2 hours from their life to watch it.