COVID-19/Coronavirus Information and Support Thread (see OP for useful links)

  • Thread starter baldgye
  • 13,285 comments
  • 647,266 views
I'm at the beginning of a career as a professional bassoonist, so naturally the reports of people being left with permanent lung damage is a cause for concern for me. Is there much data on the percentage of recovered patients who've been left with long-term lung problems?

I'd imagine permanent lung damage is a concern for pretty much anyone that enjoys breathing!

Especially concerning for someone who is attempting to make a living dependent on their lungs being able to supply air to an instrument.
 
Especially concerning for someone who is attempting to make a living dependent on their lungs being able to supply air to an instrument.
A musician can always switch to a different instrument.
 
Especially concerning for someone who is attempting to make a living dependent on their lungs being able to supply air to an instrument.

Obviously it depends on the extent of the damage, but I went 2-3 days with a severe and painful shortness of breath last year and I was pretty much totally incapacitated - simple stuff like talking or moving about left me unable to catch my breath, and then of course there's the accompanying panic attacks from thinking you're about to die, which were unpleasant to say the least. I'm pretty sure it would be bad news for people in many, many, jobs.

Seriously, breathing unaided without pain is something everybody should give thanks for everyday!
 
A musician can always switch to a different instrument.

Most professionals would not be able to perform at a professional level on another instrument, which is what @PeterJB set out to achieve. It takes years of practice to play at a professional level and it is not necessarily something that translates to another instrument.

It would also be devastating to play an instrument, amateurly or professionally, for years and have that torn away because of disease/virus complications.

EDIT: I completely forgot to mention the investment side of playing an instrument. Higher quality bassoons cost over five figures! I would imagine other instruments are similar.

TB
As the father of a son with genetic lung issues and also plays bassoon, you can't get much more insensitive than a comment like that. :rolleyes:

Incredibly insensitive!

Obviously it depends on the extent of the damage, but I went 2-3 days with a severe and painful shortness of breath last year and I was pretty much totally incapacitated - simple stuff like talking or moving about left me unable to catch my breath, and then of course there's the accompanying panic attacks from thinking you're about to die, which were unpleasant to say the least. I'm pretty sure it would be bad news for people in many, many, jobs.

Seriously, breathing unaided without pain is something everybody should give thanks for everyday!

I agree with that. It is especially concerning for someone who is attempting to make their living partially off how their lungs can perform.
 
A musician can always switch to a different instrument.

Wow, that’s pretty thoughtless.

But let me take a guess. It was easy for you to transition from playing the bongos with Timothy Leary while trippin’ balls to mastering the rain stick with Ghandi.
Can’t wait for the pan flute story with Zanfere :rolleyes:
 
A musician can always switch to a different instrument.

Some instruments are "interchangeable" so to speak. Tripling is a common career path where people learn flute, clarinet, and saxophone and play them in pit bands. The bassoon itself is not intelligible with any other instruments (other than its sole auxiliary, the contrabassoon). I used to play cello but had to give that up cause of injury, but for anyone else, playing say, a woodwind instrument professionally gives you no advantages when starting a string or brass instrument from scratch other than already being able to read music.

Case in point, here's me and my best friend swapping instruments for fun at college: :D



Most professionals would not be able to perform at a professional level on another instrument, which is what @PeterJB set out to achieve. It takes years of practice to play at a professional level and it is not necessarily something that translates to another instrument.

It would also be devastating to play an instrument, amateurly or professionally, for years and have that torn away because of disease/virus complications.

EDIT: I completely forgot to mention the investment side of playing an instrument. Higher quality bassoons cost over five figures! I would imagine other instruments are similar.

I agree with that. It is especially concerning for someone who is attempting to make their living partially off how their lungs can perform.

My bassoon cost £9,500. I ever decided to get a contrabassoon that would set me back £25,000. Ever wonder why there are so few bassoonists? :lol:

I haven't seen much discussions from other musicians online about the side effects of COVID-19, though I'm sure they share my concerns. Coughs and colds are giant nuisance already, especially for singers, and there's always fears of injuries to your hands or fingers. If the worst happens and I have to stop my backup is arranging and orchestration, which I've already got a bit of a reputation for, but I'd still rather play the music than write it.

At the moment most musicians are concerned about surviving this thing financially. Your average professional orchestra makes around £4 million in revenue per year which comes almost entirely from ticket sales, and once furlough ends funds will dry out quickly and they won't be able to pay their players. Most countries have had to stop doing live concerts, some have started up again recently, but due to social distancing rules they tend to be small-scale ensembles because trying to fit a 90-piece orchestra on stage while keeping all players two metres apart (three metres in the UK) is not feasible. The three-metre rule applies mostly to wind and brass players because the government is worried about the instruments acting as droplet projectiles, even though organologists have looked into this and concluded that instruments with narrows bores and bends in the tube like the bassoon or trumpet actually filter droplets out of the air channel. Unfortunately this doesn't work so well in straight-bored instruments like the flute, clarinet and oboe, though the latter two have their bells pointed at the ground and the flutes point at the flautist next to you so they can just pass it around themselves :lol:
 
My bassoon cost £9,500.
Off topic but the one we bought on ebay had the serial number indicating it was made in the early 20's and is in very good condition. We weren't going to pass it up for $1k. :)

Thing 2 was supposed to have a band concert that was going to be performed on the football field but that was cancelled.

Unfortunately this doesn't work so well in straight-bored instruments like the flute, clarinet and oboe, though the latter two have their bells pointed at the ground and the flutes point at the flautist next to you so they can just pass it around themselves
Just put a mask on the end like a trumpet mute! :dopey:
 
TB
Off topic but the one we bought on ebay had the serial number indicating it was made in the early 20's and is in very good condition. We weren't going to pass it up for $1k. :)

Thing 2 was supposed to have a band concert that was going to be performed on the football field but that was cancelled.

That's most likely an Adler or a Mollenhauer, good instruments for beginners. Most professionals play on fairly new instruments, though pre-war Heckels are popular, but insanely expensive. My last gig was in February.

Just put a mask on the end like a trumpet mute! :dopey:

Believe it or not this has become a thing:

3070013-2T.jpg
 
Last edited:
That's most likely an Adler or a Mollenhauer. Most professionals play on fairly new instruments, though pre-war Heckels are popular, but insanely expensive. My last gig was in February.
C.G. Conn. :)

Believe it or not this has become a thing:

3070013-2T.jpg
Well that's something. If it gets people back on stage and playing, it's definitely worth it!
 
This is interesting, imo. Doesn't seem like they know how exactly the dog detects it, but that's super fascinating to me. Had no idea dogs can even identify cancer & diabetes.
Four Covid-19 sniffer dogs have begun work at Helsinki airport in a state-funded pilot scheme that Finnish researchers hope will provide a cheap, fast and effective alternative method of testing people for the virus.

A dog is capable of detecting the presence of the coronavirus within 10 seconds and the entire process takes less than a minute to complete, according to Anna Hielm-Björkman of the University of Helsinki, who is overseeing the trial.

“It’s very promising,” said Hielm-Björkman. “If it works, it could prove a good screening method in other places” such as hospitals, care homes and at sporting and cultural events.

In the university’s preliminary tests, dogs – which have been successfully used to detect diseases such as cancer and diabetes – were able to identify the virus with nearly 100% accuracy, even days before before a patient developed symptoms.

Scientists are not yet sure what exactly it is that the dogs sniff when they detect the virus. A French study published in June concluded that there was “very high evidence” that the sweat odour of Covid-positive people was different to that of those who did not have the virus, and that dogs could detect that difference.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...ort-enlists-sniffer-dogs-to-test-for-covid-19
 
How can they be sure it's not a false positive (or negative)? :confused:

Typically with these kinds of things, the dogs undergo some pretty intensive training and have to pass a pretty lengthy test designed to throw them off so they're probably fairly accurate if they're being used. But I'd imagine if the dog picks someone out, then they are required to be tested before leaving the airport. There are rapid tests now, so it could be just a 15-minute test instead of making the person camp out at the airport for days.

As for false positives or negatives, the dogs are probably more accurate than the tests. Currently, COVID tests are only about as accurate as influenza tests, which range from 80-98% accurate depending on a whole host of variables with those in the 80-95% range typically being administered at city-wide drive through testing sides and those above 95% typically being used on inpatients. I will say the last time I looked at the testing accuracy though was in early August, so they might be onto the next generation of tests now that are most accurate. But you'll never get 100% accuracy with any of these tests.
 
Since the beginning of Fresher's Week last Monday, there has been more confirmed coronavirus cases in Glasgow University's halls of residences than in the whole of China over the same time period....

I wonder what, if anything, universities across the country are doing to monitor private halls of residence, and what they can do to enforce quarantine rules in what are not legally anything to do with them. For the record, most newly built apartment blocks in my area over the last decade are private student accommodation... there's at least eight separate complexes in my area alone, housing thousands of students that are not operated or controlled by the uni... at then there's privately rented accommodation on top of that.

Meanwhile, yesterday, in a masterpiece of comic timing, some scientific advisers have suggested that student accommodation should only be operating at 1/3rd capacity... 10 days after the first day of the new academic year (last Monday)...
 
Meanwhile, yesterday, in a masterpiece of comic timing
My local version of comic timing (small sample size) is that after two weeks of school (excluding university) in my city, there has been 1 COVID case in the in-person student population and 2 amongst those who opted for full remote learning.
 
I wonder what, if anything, universities across the country are doing to monitor private halls of residence, and what they can do to enforce quarantine rules in what are not legally anything to do with them. For the record, most newly built apartment blocks in my area over the last decade are private student accommodation... there's at least eight separate complexes in my area alone, housing thousands of students that are not operated or controlled by the uni... at then there's privately rented accommodation on top of that.

Here in Utah, we're monitoring sewage to see what the potential outbreak at campuses could be. I don't envy the grad student that presumably has to go down into the sewers and scoop up the poop, then presumably carry that poop of their peers to a lab and run tests on it. Talk about a 🤬 way to earn your doctorate.

As for what universities are actually doing? Apparently not much. At Brigham Young (Mormon U) there's a massive outbreak and contributing significantly to our overall caseload. Where I work, we've just gone ahead and move all classes to virtual learning for two weeks while they disinfect campus. I'm not sure what that's going to do since people are partying hard since they don't have to get up and go to class. Football is also starting back up soon and the U's tailgates are insane, so I suspect there will be a huge influx in cases after that.
 
Edit: My bad thought I quoted you Joey.

Does disinfecting the campus make a difference when you have probably 1000+ drunk kids who can't remember where their beer is much less their mask?
 
Edit: My bad thought I quoted you Joey.

Does disinfecting the campus make a difference when you have probably 1000+ drunk kids who can't remember where their beer is much less their mask?

Not in the slightest. It just makes someone, somewhere feel good about doing something.
 
New York Times had an interesting piece about the PCR tests
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html

But yes-no isn’t good enough, he added. It’s the amount of virus that should dictate the infected patient’s next steps. “It’s really irresponsible, I think, to forgo the recognition that this is a quantitative issue,” Dr. Mina said.

The PCR test amplifies genetic matter from the virus in cycles; the fewer cycles required, the greater the amount of virus, or viral load, in the sample. The greater the viral load, the more likely the patient is to be contagious.

This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients, although it could tell them how infectious the patients are.

In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.

On Thursday, the United States recorded 45,604 new coronavirus cases, according to a database maintained by The Times. If the rates of contagiousness in Massachusetts and New York were to apply nationwide, then perhaps only 4,500 of those people may actually need to isolate and submit to contact tracing.
 
Last edited:
While some people may be more or less infective than others, not all routes of transmission are equal and it also assumes that everyone sheds the virus at the same rate. For a person to pass the virus to another by leaving some of it on a hard surface they will need to be carrying a higher load than they would to pass it on by kissing or sharing a drink bottle.
Then we have the question of where do you draw the line on who has to isolate? There are also various factors that need to be accounted for in the PCR process. Some of them don't matter much in terms of a Yes/No result but make a huge difference in a quantitative result.
 
Scotland expecting a second wave ?

https://www.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=SEP395267

Probably not.

The appointment of a Lead Advisor consultant to support the decommissioning of the NHS Louisa Jordan temporary field hospital at the Scottish Events Campus (SEC) in Glasgow

Though they could be getting their appointment in early for when they do decommission.

I've posted this because governments, and people for that matter, should not be judged by their words, but by their deeds.

NEWSFLASH - Huffington Post must be following this thread . https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/en...irus_uk_5f686da4c5b6de79b677e909?guccounter=1
 
Last edited:
Back