- 5,051
- Netherlands
Yea, this was my point. It's worse than flu, but not by so much that it needs to cause widespread panic.
In this case some panic is good. Fear is a great catalyst for awareness.
Yea, this was my point. It's worse than flu, but not by so much that it needs to cause widespread panic.
No, I'm not suggesting incubation persists for months. How did you ever get that idea? I'm suggesting incubation can take up to 14 days, that cold and flu like symptoms can present for a week or more, and that a final struggle for life with pneumonia can take weeks or even months.You're suggesting that it incubates/persists for months? The only statements from scientists I've seen suggest an average of 6 days incubation followed by 7 days of symptomatic suffering. By the end of that time patients are alive (98% so far) or dead (2% so far, all elderly or with preexisting respiratory conditions).
You seem keen to stew the figures to get a much higher death rate but the evidence is apparently against that.
You are accusing me of fear mongering, and I resent it. Just stop it.
If the Republicans are corruptly seizing power and influencing the next election, would it not be a sound idea to fight them to the very maximum in the courts, in the media, in Congress, and ultimately on the streets in acts of defiance, boycott, sabotage and finally armed rebellion?
I'm suggesting the Republicans may not be generally corrupt and trying to illegally gain power and illegally influence the next election. If you sincerely think they are, then wouldn't you have a moral obligation to take up arms if necessary to keep America free and democratic?How do you post this roughly within 20 minutes of posting this?
I'm suggesting the Republicans may not be generally corrupt and trying to illegally gain power and illegally influence the next election. If you sincerely think they are, then wouldn't you have a moral obligation to take up arms if necessary to keep America free and democratic?
When I was protesting the Vietnam war, I took part in riots in which streets were barricaded, things were broken and/or set on fire, and some people including cops got roughed up. I had clear and firm beliefs, and I acted upon them, despite some risk. I don't really believe you think Republicans are mostly corrupt.I know what you're suggesting. You're attempting to use fear of violence to argue against my point.
When I was protesting the Vietnam war, I took part in riots in which streets were barricaded, things were broken and/or set on fire, and some people including cops got roughed up. I had clear and firm beliefs, and I acted upon them, despite some risk. I don't really believe you think Republicans are mostly corrupt.
I've got the lurgey!
The "lurgey"? So you've got an imaginary disease? What do you mean to do about it?
Whatever, no worries. In any case 98% chance you'll be well again in 6 days.Whisky. Works on anything. Lurgey isn't imaginary though, it can refer to any unidentified or non-specific illness. Mine is probably a version of manfluenza.
If people have any concerns about their health in relation to suspected coronavirus, we ask that they follow current PHE advice and contact NHS 111.”
So this is an interesting article I found.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/he...eadlier-more-widespread/ar-BBZyqgm?li=BBnba9O
Coronavirus is scary but it's not as deadly as the flu.
From the article "So far, there have been an estimated 19 million cases of flu, 180,000 hospitalizations and 10,000 deaths in the U.S. this influenza season"
So every year we should announce the Flu being a national emergency here in the US if that's the case?
Another confirmed case in the US in Mass.
Putting the US now at 8 confirmed cases.
You need to be careful to be specific here and not try to compare a single virus (e.g. novel coronavirus 2019) to an entire family of viruses ('influenza') which comprises many different strains, each one with different properties. As such, comparisons between current 'flu' deaths and the outbreak of a new strain of coronavirus will only tell you so much - it is probably better to simply focus on the facts that pertain to the current outbreak rather than getting too hung up on comparisons that may not mean much.
@Dennisch and @Touring Mars
This is straight from CDC
"Coronaviruses are a large family of viruses that are common in many different species of animals, including camels, cattle, cats, and bats."
So technically it is a "virus" but it's made up from other viruses. (Example like Influenza is also made up of other viruses but it's called the flu)
Edit: From the WHO
"Coronaviruses (CoV) are a large family of viruses that cause illness ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS-CoV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV). A novel coronavirus (nCoV) is a new strain that has not been previously identified in humans. "
As for whether flu should be treated as an emergency every year... well, it is. But - there are vaccines and treatments available for known/existing viruses, which makes them much less deadly in terms of how many people who get infected die as a result of that infection.
nCoV is less deadly than Influenza.
Just to further Mars point a touch further, all of the stats in the media right now are specifically about nCov, not SARS, not MERS, not the whole of the coronavirus family. The influenza stats on the other hand are tracking no less that 4 flu strains. The two main strains this year for influenza A are (N1H1)pdm09 amd H3N2 while influenza b is tracking that Yamagata lineage and the Voctoria lineage.@Dennisch and @Touring Mars
This is straight from CDC
"Coronaviruses are a large family of viruses that are common in many different species of animals, including camels, cattle, cats, and bats."
So technically it is a "virus" but it's made up from other viruses. (Example like Influenza is also made up of other viruses but it's called the flu)
Edit: From the WHO
"Coronaviruses (CoV) are a large family of viruses that cause illness ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS-CoV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV). A novel coronavirus (nCoV) is a new strain that has not been previously identified in humans. "
Indeed.
But you are making the same mistake as @Dotini when you said "Coronavirus is scary but it is not as deadly as flu" (although I believe Dotini was actually making the opposite point).
You can't/should not compare a single strain of one virus family to an entire other family of viruses.
You can, however, compare specific strains of viruses to each other, and even compare one virus family to another, but not the above.
-
As for whether flu should be treated as an emergency every year... well, it is. But - there are vaccines and treatments available for known/existing viruses, which makes them much less deadly in terms of how many people who get infected die as a result of that infection.
But new strains of viruses appear all the time - and this is why flu remains such a major killer, and also why flu outbreaks are still very dangerous and unpredictable - as different strains have different properties, and existing vaccines may or may not be very effective against new strains.
In any case, I don't think there is much merit (at this point in time anyway) in comparing one family of viruses to another - it would be better to focus on how to deal with the current outbreak rather than trying to pretend like it is no big deal. It is.
Ahemmmmmm.I honestly do not understand what mistake I am making. Could you specifically clarify, please? I want to stop making mistakes, and delete those I have already made.
Also, you say comparison of one family of viruses with another lacks merit, but focus on dealing with this outbreak has merit. Could you please give a good (model) example of a post that focuses on dealing with the outbreak, the kind of post you think we should be making? Thank you.
Just to further Mars point a touch further, all of the stats in the media right now are specifically about nCov, not SARS, not MERS, not the whole of the coronavirus family. The influenza stats on the other hand are tracking no less that 4 flu strains. The two main strains this year for influenza A are (N1H1)pdm09 amd H3N2 while influenza b is tracking that Yamagata lineage and the Voctoria lineage.
So you see the issue. Using influenza number alone, you are comparing probably more than 6 influenza strains with only 1 coronavirus strain.
Influenza numbers source
I will delete all my posts in which both novel coronavirus and flu appear. Okay?Ahemmmmmm.
Use the family to measure the family, or use a strain to measure a strain. Measuring the single nCov strain top the entire influenza family paints a terribly inaccurate picture
I thought we had already resolved it, but for the sake of clarity:I honestly do not understand what mistake I am making. Could you specifically clarify, please? I want to stop making mistakes, and delete those I have already made.
No. I said:DotiniAlso, you say comparison of one family of viruses with another lacks merit
I don't think there is much merit (at this point in time anyway) in comparing one family of viruses to another
Holy moly.I will delete all my posts in which both novel coronavirus and flu appear. Okay?
Should I also delete all my posts in which nCoV and SARS are both charted?
I am going to assume that it would be okay to compare the nCoV with SARS. Okay?The take-home message is that comparing a single strain to an entire family of viruses is going to give you misleading or meaningless results.
A more useful thing to do would be to ask which virus strains and specific outbreaks of specific strains have similar properties to the current outbreak.
Of course it will be important and useful to compare key features of this outbreak to others, but the main issue at the moment is in dealing with how to contain this outbreak rather than wondering which set of viruses is worse than the other set.