Mr_NubinzFor me I feel it depends on how the rest of the Chassis and footwork is set up. Also I'm curious how peoples toe settings influence the camber. For instance I run no toe front or rear, because when was the last time to saw a pro drift car all toe'd out. But with my miata I run no camber in the rear and 2.5 up front And it's so f'n balanced and fun and I have no issues with the lack of power. And my supra is .5R (which I never go above 1 in the rear) and 3 F because it will get so sideways. I feel anything above 3F and 1R is compensating for and unbalanced set up. BUT this is just my opinion, and just my tuning style.
This is a great topic cause I've been doing this myself when I go to drift events and talk to people about what toe and camber they are running and then try and apply it to gt5. So far so good.
If a car isn't perfectly balanced, which many are not, then you use varying levels of camber to compensate. I don't mean to put words into your mouth so please clarify, but for a moment it seemed as if you were saying that a car with more than 3F and 1R has a bad tune.
Sorry to bump the thread , but it's something I really want to discuss. Comfort Hards provide basically no grip and you're left sliding pretty much all the time, which is fun yet unrealistic, but hey.
However, Camber becomes important when the car leans, these poor tires provide so little grip the car isn't likely to lean much at all, especially with stiff drift cars, so, I would think high camber does just decrease grip, below 1 on front and close to 0 on the rear surely ?.
If we used better tires then camber would perhaps react better.