Again to a degree I would agree with regard to loose surfaces, but not with sealed surfaces. In those cases sideways, with the exception of hairpins, is not the norm for speed and hasn't been for a long time.
Loeb again is a poor example to use, given that he was one of the first of the modern drivers to move away from the 'always sideways' method of driving to a more precise and tidy approach. Sideways has not been the norm (with the exception of a few drivers and events) for a long time, which is why rally fans have been moaning about it's demise for a long time. Now loose surface events will always have more sideways than any sealed surface, but it's a myth that modern cars are as sideways as the cars I grew up watching in the 70s and 80s. Drivetrain and suspension developments have seen to that since the mid 90s or so.
Describing the amount of lateral g on track as 'as little as possible' would also be misleading wording. You want to generate the maximum lateral g you can up to the slip limit of the tyre and track interface. The only way to generate the lowest g you can and still get around a corner would be to drive it as slowly as you can.
Serves me right for picking an argument with Scaff. I will never win these kinds of semantic arguments
As you can probably guess English isn't my native language, so I tend to use words loosely (when better words are available) and the true meaning might not come across perfectly to a native speaker.
Having said that, I agree wholeheartedly with your post there. When I mention "rally" I meant loose surfaces (gravel, dirt, snow, ice). I know tarmac rallies exist and going sideways (except in hairpins) is definitely not the fastest way.
I have also noticed rally cars are getting less and less sideways nowadays, compared to clips from the 70s and 80s for example. Now I don't profess to follow WRC that closely to know all the ins and outs of the rule changes over the years, but the cars' improvement in aerodynamic and mechanical grip might be the reason. You do agree though that loose surface events will always have more sideways moments than fully sealed surfaces. If in the future we can create magic tyres that grips as well on dirt as on tarmac, maybe we'll see rally drivers taking tarmac lines exactly as F1 drivers
For my lateral g comment, I should've said as little steering angle as possible. If you take a road driving line (mid-mid-mid) vs racing line (out-in-out) you're using much less steering angle with a racing line. My brain equates that to less lateral g, but I realize now that is not correct because your speed is also higher
Comparing to rally, my main argument is the car's orientation is always "straighter" in circuit racing than in rally racing, though as you pointed out the difference is not as big today as in the past, which we have agreed above 👍
I hope that clears up the misunderstanding