Disappointing cars

  • Thread starter Mike Rotch
  • 31 comments
  • 1,058 views

Mike Rotch

Aluminium Overcast
Staff Emeritus
13,827
Australia
Down under
Which cars are the biggest let down? The ones that you think have so much potential, but after spending 100 G's on em, go like a tug boat? For me the TRD3000 is right up there. One of the most awesome looking cars in the game, but too heavy to mix it with a CTR2, and toasted by most cars up to 450hp. The Avenger and Intrepid are also tin cans in my book:D
 
The aston martin db7 was a disapointement, the v8 vantage I had already realized it was heavy but I was expecting the db7 to be a bit more nimble.
 
3000GT, Vipers, NSX's, and even some of the skylines.

I say some of the Skylines as the base models even when done up do not react anything like the real cars. They turn like pigs in the game and that is so untrue. I bit disapointing since the game is developed in Japan.
 
Yeah I might.
But seriously, if you´re complaining about the stability in the car just lower a lot the front/rear bound/rebound and max up the ascc. As simple as that just try it. If you dislike him for other reasons then...

Back on topic, 528i and 840ci. I was expecting more HP after tune up
 
Originally posted by bla
The aston martin db7 was a disapointement, the v8 vantage I had already realized it was heavy but I was expecting the db7 to be a bit more nimble.

100%. That vantage is the biggest lemon ever. After 500k out of the bank, my 71 charger flame grilled it :irked:
 
The Vantage, almost all the BMWs, the Ford Mustangs (except the SR Widebody), and the Spoon Civic.
 
The Impreza 22B leaps most readily to mind. Fifty Gs for that kind of understeer? No thanks. I'll buy a regular STi for thirty, put twenty into it and give you a far superior machine.
 
The FIAT Coupe, but don't tell ving I said that! I was expecting more power out of this FIAT when it was fully tuned. It was a little disappointing.
 
The MR2 is a little to heavy but I still play it because its freakin cool looking....The GT90 used to be my favorite car, it had a few stability problems and that is one of the reasons its just a nice car now. RX7s...well....they look cool and
The RX-7' s are kind of a let down.
do you mean by that¿ For the power they do have I think is used wisely...

Of course, just a little bit of personal oppinion:).
 
They didn't give my Neon ACR enough max power. Oh well, there's always hybrids...

I don't see how the RX-7s could be disappointing; many of them can kick the computer's JGTC GT500 cars into the weeds. And how can you hate an FC Infini III that can get dirt tires?

The GT90 is a lot of fun, it just needs a 6th gear.
 
yes:D --it's actually a cute mini car,also an RR one '69
;) and it can be tuned up to 145ps ,with a stage 2 turbo in it:cool:

but :odd: the most turbo-lagging one:dopey:
 
The problem is....the second ashtray makes the balance dodgy in the fast corners (20 MPH+)....

BTW...do you know why Fiats have heated rear windows?....

To keep your hands warm when you have to push these
 
Originally posted by lefrog
The problem is....the second ashtray makes the balance dodgy in the fast corners (20 MPH+)....

BTW...do you know why Fiats have heated rear windows?....

To keep your hands warm when you have to push these

:lol: To correct the balance, i usually put fuzzy dice on the rear view mirror
 
does upset the aerodynamics a bit. the cd goes from 0.88 to 0.92, so top speed goes down from about 31mph to around 25mph. But you buy this car for it handling, not its top speed:D
 
Back