You need to take the
4 from the end of that address for it to work for all users
The article seems quite flawed and makes some poor translations. For example, they translate " يَا مَعْشَرَ الْجِنِّ وَالْإِنسِ إِنِ اسْتَطَعْتُمْ أَن تَنفُذُوا مِنْ أَقْطَارِ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ فَانفُذُوا ۚ لَا تَنفُذُونَ إِلَّا بِسُلْطَانٍ " as "O You jinn and men, if you can penetrate zones of the heavens and the Earth, then penetrate! You will never penetrate them except with (the) power (of science)."
Except that there doesn't seem to be a mention of science in there; the word used is " بِسُلْطَانٍ " which, at least to my poor Arabic, translates as "power" or "higher authority" (or applies to a thing/person that has been given such blessing). There's no translation that relates to science that I can see.
Then there are the honey-bee facts;
In Verses 68-69, we are told that it is the female bee that makes honey, a very recent bit of knowledge for humans. We know now that male bees die after mating with the queen and live only for about 90 days. Only female bees survive to be the workers, which gather nectar and make honey. This bit of knowledge could never be known to humans before the invention and use of microscopes. It is another piece of evidence that the author of the Holy Quran could never be a human being about 1428 years ago. Rather, He is the All Knowledgeable One.
It's slightly factually incorrect as it leads one to believe that drones are only female; that isn't true although it's true that male drones don't survive mating. They drone away up until that point though. We're then told that you need a microscope to understand these things. Fortunately the Egyptian honey-farmers didn't need them 4500 years ago, they managed perfectly well to understand. And they were definitely human, no divine intervention required.
The ant fact (a female ant speaks in the Qu'uran therefore it was known that all ant workers are female) is just too much of a leap of credibility, I'm afraid, definitely nothing to see there and notably the Qu'uranic passage itself makes no claim similar to the article's author.
Then we move through the facts that plants can reproduce, that water comes from clouds, and that it's dark underwater.
It's an article that tries very hard to make something from nothing, at least that's how it seems to me.