Or did you USE to listen to bad music and now your taste has matured and you don't anymore?
Remember that "bad" music is your definition of bad music and that definition will differ from person to person. Just because you don't like it, doesn't make it bad.Just wondering how many people do, with Gungnam style reaching 1 B views
Be Honest
Maybe you just listen to it because your friends listen to it? Or did you USE to listen to bad music and now your taste has matured and you dont anymore?
Remember that "bad" music is your definition of bad music and that definition will differ from person to person. Just because you don't like it, doesn't make it bad.
No, I don't like bad music, because it's... Well it's bad.
Remember that "bad" music is your definition of bad music and that definition will differ from person to person. Just because you don't like it, doesn't make it bad.
Gangnam isn't actually, well... bad... just over-exposed. I mean, it's nowhere near as bad as "Call Me Maybe", or even "Rico Suave".
What constitutes bad music, if music isn't to your taste that doesn't mean it's bad.
I don't really get why I like dubstep. All it is, is noise. If you listen carefully to what it actually is you'll find yourself sitting there thinking???!!?!
Bad music is based on opinion and not fact. That said there is no such that as bad music. However, there is music that I find that does not submit to my tastes, therefore I think it's bad. Hwoever, someone else may like it and think the music I listen to is bad.
That said, if it doesn't appeal to me, then I won't listen to it. But at the same time, I listen to bad music if someone else tastes don't appeal to what I listen to.
So yes and no.
But what about music trhat is of bad musical quality? Poorly played instruments etc.
Some people might actually like poor instrumental skills...
What I mean is that you can say that music is objectively bad or good, from a musical standpoint. So it all really depends on what you mean by good or bad.
Most people mean what music they like, which can be bad sometimes. Like saying a group of amazing musicians are bad when really meaning they don't like them. I personally don't like using the word in that sense.
I think it's better to say that you like/don't like the music instead.
And this.
She repeats the chorus line 50+ times in that song. No more evidence needed to prove that money doesn't buy talent. If we followed Earth's criteria of poor rhythm, lyrics, & vocals, this is a perfect example of bad music, of which I agree.
This type of thinking doesn't apply to every song like you think it does. If your chorus only consists of 1 line, & then gets repeated 16 times in 3 different points in a 3 minute-long song, that is not musical talent. Any idiot can write "music" like that by repeating 1 line throughout a song as long as you have a beat. But, even with such a simplistic line, some critics still said her vocals were still heavily tuned.Just because it doesn't mesh the way you think it should doesn't mean it's "bad" music. Someone may like it. If it doesn't fit your criteria or appeal to you it still doesn't mean it's bad, that's just what we refer to it as if for some reason it doesn't appeal to us.