Dumb Questions Thread

  • Thread starter Liquid
  • 822 comments
  • 57,727 views
I have been to three or four, but they were nothing like the raunch portrayed in the movies. Really just the guys getting together to drink, and promising the groom-to-be that his life is basically over. The ones I've been to ranged from a week prior to the day prior. Never heard of one after...
 
Last edited:
Never heard of one after...
I'm going on one, actually. My friend lives in an Orthodox Christian country and the girlfriend's parents are very conservative. In order to be allowed to continue go out long-term, the parents made them get married. They firmly believe in no sex before marriage and thought their daughter was still a virgin at 28.

So my friend is already legally married but hasn't had the big social ceremony nor the stag party, which is due to happen next year, Covid notwithstanding.
 
The best stag I've been at included guns and a tiger in the toilet. The 2nd best one involved off road buggies.
 
The best stag I've been at included guns and a tiger in the toilet. The 2nd best one involved off road buggies.
I thiiiiiiiiiiiiink we might have allowed a day or two of recovery between them.

It was enjoyable, but it include the attempt to give a bottle of victory champagne to a group of recovering alcoholics or a woman literally exiting the entire course stage right at an altitude of about 20 feet.
 
It was enjoyable, but it include the attempt to give a bottle of victory champagne to a group of recovering alcoholics or a woman literally exiting the entire course stage right at an altitude of about 20 feet.
Or the forbidden line at the last corner, which was attempted by the buggy that ended up upside down.

None of whom were in our group, I hasten to add.
 
How are artificial elements even a thing?

I understand finding previously undiscovered elements because they are so scarce or volatile but surely by definition, it shouldn't be possible to create elements?
 
How are artificial elements even a thing?

I understand finding previously undiscovered elements because they are so scarce or volatile but surely by definition, it shouldn't be possible to create elements?
They're considered artificial because they aren't created naturally, at least on Earth. If an atom of a particular element arises from natural processes, it's natural. If humans arranged the protons and neutrons to form the atom, it's artificial. Some artificial elements can form naturally, but all of them are radioactive so the vast majority of the atoms of these elements would have decayed eons ago (since stars are the source of heavy elements), because of that it makes sense to consider them artificial on Earth.
 
How are artificial elements even a thing?

I understand finding previously undiscovered elements because they are so scarce or volatile but surely by definition, it shouldn't be possible to create elements?
They're considered artificial because they aren't created naturally, at least on Earth. If an atom of a particular element arises from natural processes, it's natural. If humans arranged the protons and neutrons to form the atom, it's artificial. Some artificial elements can form naturally, but all of them are radioactive so the vast majority of the atoms of these elements would have decayed eons ago (since stars are the source of heavy elements), because of that it makes sense to consider them artificial on Earth.
It's "just" a case of smashing two very heavy nuclei together and hoping that most of them stick together and only a very small amount of protons and neutrons bounce off - or by blasting one very heavy nucleus with high energy protons to force them to stick to it.

If that sounds a bit like nuclear fusion... well, kinda. Some artificial elements do form in that environment, with decay products of uranium smashing into each other in intense temperatures.

They tend not to last long. There's no configuration of neutrons and protons we know of with more than 99 of them combined that doesn't fall apart under its own weight. We've not found the mythical "island of stability" - a configuration of around 115 protons and 280 neutrons which is stable, although some of the elements around that mark have half-lives in the range of tens of seconds rather than tens of milliseconds either side, and there might be more stable elements at considerably higher numbers.
 
They're considered artificial because they aren't created naturally, at least on Earth.
Thank you, I had not considered this point at all. By forcing the existance of these elements on earth artificially, we are discovering elements that could very well occur easily and naturally elsewhere in the universe. Is that fair to say?
 
Thank you, I had not considered this point at all. By forcing the existance of these elements on earth artificially, we are discovering elements that could very well occur easily and naturally elsewhere in the universe. Is that fair to say?
Elements that, yes, could be (and some definitely are like Technetium) formed elsewhere. Easily may or may not be an accurate term. Elements up to iron release energy when fusing because they are increasingly stable. These elements are relatively easy to make in star cores, some just require bigger stars. After iron though there are too many protons and repulsive forces increase in the nucleus. You start to need to put in extra energy to fuse up to heavier elements. By the time you approach the 100's of protons, nuclei are unstable and the time it takes for atoms to spontaneously split starts to become very small as @Famine mentioned.

Super heavy elements in nature basically require stellar explosions to form. I don't know how far up the periodic table the debris go exactly, but supernova and the like are extremely energetic, so I don't see why extremely small amount of very heavy elements couldn't form. Perhaps even some in the island of stability. I'm not an expert though.
 
Is there any particular reason that so many nations' national anthems are still Western military marches? In this post-colonial era, you would think that as part of forging their own national identity, or 'decolonising' if you will, more nations in Africa and Asia would have adopted national anthems incorporating indigenous musical styles. Half the African national anthems sound less like a homage to the national itself and more like a homage to whatever military dictator is running the joint. Japan was never officially colonised, but their national anthem is very unique and sounds completely Japanese through and through. Contrast that with the Chinese national anthem, again, never officially colonised, but does not sound in the slightest bit Chinese.
 
I suppose after the trope of national anthems being marches or hymns in nature was firmly established, it just became something that stuck around.

The content seems to be more important than the style; two of the anthems I know and happily sing on occasion, the Welsh and Slovak anthems, are more like poetic hymns than military marches.

You could have a pop song as a national anthem but it just wouldn't fit. Australia nearly passed having Waltzing Matilda as its anthem (the actual one being Advance, Australia Fair) but I'd like to think having something like Land Down Under would be too silly to have on a formal occasion such as an international event or a national day of acknowledgement or government business.
 
There's no configuration of neutrons and protons we know of with more than 99 of them combined that doesn't fall apart under its own weight.
Does that imply that silver with about 106 nucleons is radioactive, or did I misinterpret the term "fall apart under its own weight"?
 
I'd like to think having something like Land Down Under would be too silly to have on a formal occasion such as an international event or a national day of acknowledgement or government business.
No it wouldn't, it'd be perfect.
 
tom-waits.gif
 
No it wouldn't, it'd be perfect.
Yeah, it really would be.

Land Down Under for us and Dave Dobbyn's, "Slice of Heaven" as New Zealand anthem. Imagine those being played on the podium at the Olympics or another sporting event. I want to live in that reality.
 
Last edited:
Plastic eating bacteria have been proposed as one solution to plastic pollution. However ever since I've heard of the idea I've been concerned with chance of these bacteria getting into the wild. Wouldn't they pose a massive threat to plastic products? It would seem wise to me to prevent their ability to reproduce without human assistance, but I don't think I've heard this suggested anywhere. Perhaps the risk is lower than I think?
 
Plastic eating bacteria have been proposed as one solution to plastic pollution. However ever since I've heard of the idea I've been concerned with chance of these bacteria getting into the wild. Wouldn't they pose a massive threat to plastic products? It would seem wise to me to prevent their ability to reproduce without human assistance, but I don't think I've heard this suggested anywhere. Perhaps the risk is lower than I think?
Seems like the type of thinking that led to Cane toads, rabbits & foxes being introduced to Australia. All went on to be completely out of control pests.

If they can make it so the bacteria only reproduces in a lab, or only survives in sea water, awesome.

But I agree, this could open a can of worms… Or countless plastic containers of worms to be more accurate.
 
Thank you, I had not considered this point at all. By forcing the existance of these elements on earth artificially, we are discovering elements that could very well occur easily and naturally elsewhere in the universe. Is that fair to say?
IIRC Iron is the heaviest element that can be made in a Star, and everything from Cobalt to Uranium has to be made in Supernovae. Anything above Uranium (so Neptunium onwards) cannot be made by natural processes and has to be done by artificial, human designed methods. Plutonium can occasionally form in a bunch of specific-isotope Uranium that decays and reforms in the right way. These artificial elements usually have a very short half-life and emit alpha particles as the Strong Nuclear force begins to weaken as the number of protons and neutrons build up. All these new ones like Dubnium, Oganesson and Tennessine have really short half-lives of fractions of seconds for this exact reason. They've reached a point where creating new elements is more for fun than actual usage.
 
Plastic eating bacteria have been proposed as one solution to plastic pollution. However ever since I've heard of the idea I've been concerned with chance of these bacteria getting into the wild. Wouldn't they pose a massive threat to plastic products? It would seem wise to me to prevent their ability to reproduce without human assistance, but I don't think I've heard this suggested anywhere. Perhaps the risk is lower than I think?

If they can make it so the bacteria only reproduces in a lab, or only survives in sea water, awesome.
Evolve Jurassic Park GIF
 
Since it was brought up elsewhere, is it a particular type of water used in nuclear reactors? I'd imagine softened would actually be preferable to distilled because of its increased ability to absorb heat.
 
Since it was brought up elsewhere, is it a particular type of water used in nuclear reactors? I'd imagine softened would actually be preferable to distilled because of its increased ability to absorb heat.
I don't know too much about nuclear reactor coolant but I do know there are two general types used; heavy water (deuterium oxide - a particular isotope of hydrogen) and borated water (water with boron).

Heavy water coolant is prone to combustion under leakage.
Borated water is more likely to become radioactive.

Because... science.
 
Last edited:
I suppose after the trope of national anthems being marches or hymns in nature was firmly established, it just became something that stuck around.

The content seems to be more important than the style; two of the anthems I know and happily sing on occasion, the Welsh and Slovak anthems, are more like poetic hymns than military marches.

You could have a pop song as a national anthem but it just wouldn't fit. Australia nearly passed having Waltzing Matilda as its anthem (the actual one being Advance, Australia Fair) but I'd like to think having something like Land Down Under would be too silly to have on a formal occasion such as an international event or a national day of acknowledgement or government business.
I believe Waltzing Matilda is the anthem for the US Marines though.
 

Latest Posts

Back