Dumb Questions Thread

[Joey D]

What is the most cost effective way to access journals if you aren't a student/don't work for a university?

The best thing to do is e-mail one of the authors of the paper you're interested in. They worked incredibly hard on their paper and most of the time will be willing to share it with you. They don't see money from the publications so they're probably not going to tell you that you need to buy the journal.

Plenty of libraries carry various journals. You might need to poke around to find the one you're looking for, but chance are libraries in major cities should have them.

CORE is another good place to look: https://core.ac.uk/

 

[HenrySwanson]

I'm not sure how feasible that is as I want to do a semi-literature review.

My friend's OpenAthens login gets me access to BMJ Best Practice and Uptodate....but I don't think it unlocks any articles that aren't already free to view that I've found through PubMed.

 

[Imari]

I'm not sure how feasible that is as I want to do a semi-literature review.

My friend's OpenAthens login gets me access to BMJ Best Practice and Uptodate....but I don't think it unlocks any articles that aren't already free to view that I've found through PubMed.

arXiv is an option, it has a lot of stuff but often not the really big papers.

As far as I know Alexandra Elbakyan's little website is still going. If you're going to use the stuff for any sort of commercial purpose that's probably not a good idea, but if it's just for personal research it's very convenient.

Depending on what your subject matter area is sometimes you can find forums or the like which will have archives of material and/or people with access who can help.

Googling by DOI or the exact title + "pdf" sometimes gets you results, but you'd probably have to do it with something other than actual Google these days. And have all your adblockers and stuff on for whatever website you get sent to.

As others have said, email the author is really the only surefire way. You can build a list of papers you want from abstracts and references, and you'll often find that the same half dozen or so people have probably done 80% of the research you're interested in.

 

[Liquid]

Guess which country sits at the top of UK exports, with almost double that of the next place? If you went for the US at circa $72 billion per year you would be correct.

[...]

the delta to second place (Germany) has grown from circa $10B prior to Brexit to over $30B last year, making the UK far more reliant on exports to the US than pre-Brexit.

I understand what is trying to be said here and I understand it's a pretty funny motorsports reference but once again, I do genuinely trip up on numbers.

Does it mean that the gap between UK's number one export destination (USA) and number two (Germany) has grown by 20 billion? That is to say, Germany was only 10 billion behind the USA but is now 30 billion behind?

 

[Scaff]

I understand what is trying to be said here and I understand it's a pretty funny motorsports reference but once again, I do genuinely trip up on numbers.

Does it mean that the gap between UK's number one export destination (USA) and number two (Germany) has grown by 20 billion? That is to say, Germany was only 10 billion behind the USA but is now 30 billion behind?

Yep, it's a rather large increase

 

[Liquid]

Are Americans generally aware of how poor their chocolate is perceived outside of North America?

Obviously many US firms are well-established as global leaders, Mars alone is significant enough, and what they make in other markets and for other markets is different but if you generally talk about "American chocolate" in Europe, many people who know it or have tried it will wretch in repulsion.

 

[Meythia]

many people who know it or have tried it will wretch in repulsion.

But doesnt that apply to many things that should have a taste + that is more complicated than "sweet"?

 

[TheCracker]

Are Americans generally aware of how poor their chocolate is perceived outside of North America?

Obviously many US firms are well-established as global leaders, Mars alone is significant enough, and what they make in other markets and for other markets is different but if you generally talk about "American chocolate" in Europe, many people who know it or have tried it will wretch in repulsion.

US chocolate is made with slightly turned milk, hence anyone from outside of the US thinks its tastes like sick, or worse.

If you've grown up with it, it won't have that nasty aftertaste because your just used to chocolate tasting that way.

 

[Liquid]

US chocolate is made with slightly turned milk, hence anyone from outside of the US thinks its tastes like sick, or worse.

If you've grown up with it, it won't have that nasty aftertaste because your just used to chocolate tasting that way.

I know the reason why, it has butric acid in it, I was just wondering if this perception was known in the US itself.

 

[UKMikey]

Butyric acid?

I did ask this on a US forum once and the answer was "... well we won more wars than the Belgians and Swiss so shut tf up ya goddam limey".

I guess Nestlé technically counts as Swiss chocolate so it probably negates the Lindt advantage somewhat.