- 393
- Germany
- RaceFace85
Congratulations for this achievment.
Last edited by a moderator:
In what way is he calling for the status quo to be maintained? Treating women and men differently is what put those barriers up in the first place.No, he's not, he's calling for the status quo to be maintained, one that has held a very low glass ceiling in place for women in racing for decades.
If you're seeking to make something normal, it never will be if you forever draw attention to it every time it happens. The point I was making is that eventually you need to stop. The disagreement here is where that point lies and whether it has been reached yet. I personally don't think it has, for the record.That's got it arse about face, you don't get to a point of equality of opportunity by refusing to acknowledge that a problem exists and not talking about it, all that does is perpetuate the issue.
And doing nothing different is keeping those barriers firmly entrenched.In what way is he calling for the status quo to be maintained? Treating women and men differently is what put those barriers up in the first place.
Strawman, as that's not what I have advocated, nor is it what has happened here.Let me try rephrasing my point as a question: Do you think it is helpful to put a massive spotlight on every woman who breaks into racing? Some will like it no doubt, but others will be put off by it and that doesn't help if you're seeking to make the ratio of men and women taking part closer to 1:1.
You missed the part about them being discouraged by being treated differently in a negative manner, positive re-enforcement and publicly acknowledge role-models will help women into the sport, not discourage them.It's like when you hear about women who get discouraged from taking part in online games with voice chat because people treat them differently. That's the angle I'm coming from. Not making a fuss provides them the environment they're looking for.
This is literally the first time it's happened and the first interview of its type the site has run, how the **** is that 'forever drawing attention to it', christ on a bike, your own insecurity is shining through here. That you (and a thankfully small number of others) are focusing on the fact that her gender was pointed out, rather than her actually accomplishments says a massive amount about your own views on the subject of gender and equality.If you're seeking to make something normal, it never will be if you forever draw attention to it every time it happens. The point I was making is that eventually you need to stop. The disagreement here is where that point lies and whether it has been reached yet. I personally don't think it has, for the record.
“Women can do anything a man can do, there is no difference. That’s why we must put on a pedestal and treat as a goddess every woman who accomplishes ¼ of what a man does”
And doing nothing different is keeping those barriers firmly entrenched.
I was referring to things in general. Of course Emily wouldn't have done the interview if she wasn't comfortable with it.Strawman, as that's not what I have advocated, nor is it what has happened here.
You also miss the point that is not as I'm Emily was forced to do the interview, she seems quite happy to have the spotlight put on her for this purpose, the one who is making the massive issue about her gender is you.
I thought the example of voice chat would have made it clear I was referring to the unwanted attention that plagues a lot of female gamers, and how not making a fuss whenever a woman appears in a environment that's predominantly filled with men can encourage more participation from women.You missed the part about them being discouraged by being treated differently in a negative manner, positive re-enforcement and publicly acknowledge role-models will help women into the sport, not discourage them.
Dismissing the achievements they have made as "That’s why we must put on a pedestal and treat as a goddess every woman who accomplishes ¼ of what a man does" discourages women, not interviews and article like this one.
I'm not worked up, and I don't have any insecurities here. You seem to think I'm against the article, I'm not. I opened my first post with congratulations for Emily and you even quoted me saying that I agree with celebrating her achievement.This is literally the first time it's happened and the first interview of its type the site has run, how the **** is that 'forever drawing attention to it', christ on a bike, your own insecurity is shining through here. That you (and a thankfully small number of others) are focusing on the fact that her gender was pointed out, rather than her actually accomplishments says a massive amount about your own views on the subject of gender and equality.
Do you get similarly worked up when interviews are phrased as the oldest/youngest/first from country x are published around esport or sports in general? I'm going to hazard a guess that you never have (feel free to counter with evidence), those would be seen as perfectly acceptable, additional pieces of information, yet this one deserves to be critiqued. Maybe ask yourself why that is?
And yet you defended a member that quite clearly is attempting to maintain a status quo in which women are limited in what they can achieve and went on to post what can only be described as a misogynistic myth.I was referring to things in general. Of course Emily wouldn't have done the interview if she wasn't comfortable with it.
I haven't made a massive issue about her gender either. I started my first post in this thread with congratulations for her, as I would for anyone who got an article/interview asking how they feel about qualifying for the finals for the first time. I was simply trying to bridge a gap after seeing things take a very antagonistic jolt. That'll teach me to try to calm things down.
I thought the example of voice chat would have made it clear I was referring to the unwanted attention that plagues a lot of female gamers, and how not making a fuss whenever a woman appears in a environment that's predominantly filled with men can encourage more participation from women.
I'm not worked up, and I don't have any insecurities here. You seem to think I'm against the article, I'm not. I opened my first post with congratulations for Emily and you even quoted me saying that I agree with celebrating her achievement.
"If you're seeking to make something normal, it never will be if you forever draw attention to it every time it happens. The point I was making is that eventually you need to stop. The disagreement here is where that point lies and whether it has been reached yet. I personally don't think it has, for the record."
I was simply making the point that eventually to make something normal you need to stop bringing attention to it, and everyone's going to have their own perspective on when the right time is. That doesn't mean they should get piled on for adopting a stance that's in-line with when it has become normal. You may think they've stopped too soon, but they're not working against you.
Unfortunately no, they are not. The majority are, but some are not, and that's without the posts that have had to be deleted from here, Facebook and YouTube!Everyone in this thread is on the same side here.
Here we have a right-wing conservative who thinks only men can race - and that a women's involvement doesn't deserve to be celebrated.
If you don't get why then it says far more about you than those that can see the rather clear newsworthiness of it.
Oh and it quite clearly matters to you, or you wouldn't have bothered posting about it.
There's always one of these comments in threads regarding women and minorities,it's kind of a cliche at this point.
I should make bingo about it
No. Not even close.Is this what the kids today call "simping"?
No, it's what the kids today call 'not being a dick'!Is this what the kids today call "simping"?
Good word.temerity
Jesus Christ, the internet really has turned a funny meme about over-obsessing dudes and just applied it to any man arguing in favor of a woman.Is this what the kids today call "simping"?
LOL, imagine being so triggered by an article about a woman that you feel the need to post comments discouraging the authors from posting articles about women. And then convincing yourself that what you're doing is a good thing....for women. So much smart.