- 3,867
- Saltash
- Dolhaus
Madness!
Madness!
Okey starting to type my notes..
There was small 80's vibes on the air while driving, some cars went on 80's one hit wonder TT-tune section, with this remarks:
And this:
And then there was some cars what I could use on online races without losing my name/face due collisions and those tunes give something else from 80's, like this:
@Bowtie-muscle I might lap constant laps, but I'm not fast on results here, there might be that similar treatment to all tunes, driving on race pace and bit above. Bit hating this scoring system, coz there is those one lap wonder times around, inch side and dead driver way driven. My laps are driven realistic way, and driver leaves alive from track
My DC points will be mostly coming from idea "would I like to drive this one hour on online against other live persons and leave race with unwrecked car and without losing my name as a clean driver", so it consist is car capable of taking other lines than optimal, handling well when small mistakes happen etc, overall car handling and balance.
Okey starting to type my notes..
There was small 80's vibes on the air while driving, some cars went on 80's one hit wonder TT-tune section, with this remarks:
And this:
And then there was some cars what I could use on online races without losing my name/face due collisions and those tunes give something else from 80's, like this:
@Bowtie-muscle I might lap constant laps, but I'm not fast on results here, there might be that similar treatment to all tunes, driving on race pace and bit above. Bit hating this scoring system, coz there is those one lap wonder times around, inch side and dead driver way driven. My laps are driven realistic way, and driver leaves alive from track
My DC points will be mostly coming from idea "would I like to drive this one hour on online against other live persons and leave race with unwrecked car and without losing my name as a clean driver", so it consist is car capable of taking other lines than optimal, handling well when small mistakes happen etc, overall car handling and balance.
Just got done with two more cars. One could have been a serious contender but one setting held it back a lot. More then 2 seconds back...
Edit added video of test lap.
So that would be 👍Turned in a bit early on turn 1, ran super deep on 2, 4-5-6 were spot on but you ran deep on 7 and missed the apex, 8 seemed a little slow but the line looked fine. 👍 Keep pushing
Was just theory testing a tune, wasn't trying for a perfect lap 👍 the fact it was that sloppy and was two seconds faster shows how much camber kills cars in GT6 right now.Turned in a bit early on turn 1, ran super deep on 2, 4-5-6 were spot on but you ran deep on 7 and missed the apex, 8 seemed a little slow but the line looked fine. 👍 Keep pushing
Oh.. no... I see a debate on camber coming along. I will go and hide behind the nearest stone till this is all overWas just theory testing a tune, wasn't trying for a perfect lap 👍 the fact it was that sloppy and was two seconds faster shows how much camber kills cars in GT6 right now.
Yep.Oh.. no... I see a debate on camber coming along. I will go and hide behind the nearest stone till this is all over
If you'd had a camera on my face then that would have been pretty much how it'd goneSo that would be 👍
Fair enough, meant no harm 👍Was just theory testing a tune, wasn't trying for a perfect lap 👍 the fact it was that sloppy and was two seconds faster shows how much camber kills cars in GT6 right now.
Oh.. no... I see a debate on camber coming along. I will go and hide behind the nearest stone till this is all over
The grand canyon might be big enough for a few of us to hide in. Lots of big stones there.
Save room for me, better be a big stone as others may want to join us
Or stone hengeThe grand canyon might be big enough for a few of us to hide in. Lots of big stones there.
How about Dartmoor, that place is basically made of big rocksThe grand canyon might be big enough for a few of us to hide in. Lots of big stones there.
For some reason, people get funny when you stand too close to the stones at this site. I have no idea why, its only stones on top of stones in a circle. Very bizarre really.Or stone henge
First was Straw henge, then wood henge, then Stone henge.Or stone henge
True, big rocks on Dartmoor but its in the middle of nowhere and it is quite close to where the Beast of Bodmin lives too.How about Dartmoor, that place is basically made of big rocks
What you haven't found the camera yet?If you'd had a camera on my face then that would have been pretty much how it'd gone
Fair enough, meant no harm 👍
I find small amounts of camber useful for taking the edge off cars (try mine at 0.0 ) and adjusting the balance where you need certain settings for high speed corners but those settings cause twitchyness in slow speed sections. Also if you've got an otherwise grippy car that can't help but overwhelm the tyres on slow corner exit a small bit of rear camber makes it easier to transition between wheel spin and hook up, you get a predictable slide rather than a sudden twitch. Apart from that it can be a little bit of a false reward, the car will feel great but just loses speed compared to 0.0 in 95% of circumstances
Haven't heard anything about the beast of bodmin in a long time but the hairy hand of cadover bridge is a constant threatTrue, big rocks on Dartmoor but its in the middle of nowhere and it is quite close to where the Beast of Bodmin lives too.
This I haven't heard of. What on earth is the hairy hand of cadover bridge? it sort of sounds like a very bad adult movie.Haven't heard anything about the beast of bodmin in a long time but the hairy hand of cadover bridge is a constant threat
I would rather hide in Kings Canyon if I'm being honest. There are more caves around that part of the outback and a few waterfalls for the eyes.What you haven't found the camera yet?
You guys can use Stonehenge, Dartmoor or the Grand Canyon. I'm using Ayers Rock. That's huge!
If you'd had a camera on my face then that would have been pretty much how it'd gone
Fair enough, meant no harm 👍
I find small amounts of camber useful for taking the edge off cars (try mine at 0.0 ) and adjusting the balance where you need certain settings for high speed corners but those settings cause twitchyness in slow speed sections. Also if you've got an otherwise grippy car that can't help but overwhelm the tyres on slow corner exit a small bit of rear camber makes it easier to transition between wheel spin and hook up, you get a predictable slide rather than a sudden twitch. Apart from that it can be a little bit of a false reward, the car will feel great but just loses speed compared to 0.0 in 95% of circumstances
That's is a very solid branch you're standing on there. The tuner in question knows about this test and is grateful for the extra laps I did in the car.There is one tune posted with camber at 3.5 and another tune with camber from someone who has been pretty vocal on the forums, even vocal enough to say that zero camber doesn't often finish high in FITT events. I would guess that one of these tunes were tried with zero camber.
Yeah.... you win the big rock contestWhat you haven't found the camera yet?
You guys can use Stonehenge, Dartmoor or the Grand Canyon. I'm using Ayers Rock. That's huge!
http://www.legendarydartmoor.co.uk/hairy_hands.htmThis I haven't heard of. What on earth is the hairy hand of cadover bridge? it sort of sounds like a very bad adult movie.
Yeah I know its not mine, the point was to merely illustrate how I use it in tuningI highly doubt that your tune is the one he tested with zero camber. Going from 0.1 to zero isn't going to make a two second difference. If you truly supported that camber works in GT6, you would be willing to venture much deeper into that pool.
There is one tune posted with camber at 3.5 and another tune with camber from someone who has been pretty vocal on the forums, even vocal enough to say that zero camber doesn't often finish high in FITT events. I would guess that one of these tunes were tried with zero camber.
Yeah I know its not mine, the point was to merely illustrate how I use it in tuning
Lets not go starting fires, the same argument gets boring after the 5th or 6th time
Was just theory testing a tune, wasn't trying for a perfect lap 👍 the fact it was that sloppy and was two seconds faster shows how much camber kills cars in GT6 right now.