- 5,657
- Ohio
Lap time: 1:22:882
Pretty fast there, Petey. Nice lap.
Lap time: 1:22:882
Thanks for the review. Sounds like there is a lot of speed in this tune if a perfect lap was achieved. Glad you enjoyed the ride so much and could push through the quick corners as much as you could. You did an amazing time in my tune too so well doneHey guys, it's review time
All testing was conducted using the buttons on a DS3 with manual transmission & gear changes made at the redline on the tachometer . I did 5 clean laps as a 'getting to know you session' and that was followed by 10 clean laps that were timed. The results are as follows:
@shaunm80
Lap time: 1:23:692 DC: 9.3
Impression of the tune:
Good stability in all corners although it's a little edgy on the brakes into turns 2 & 4 and then you have to work hard for clean power down traction. It's easy flat at turn 5, if you kiss the kerbs at turns 6 & 7 it won't throw you off, has a good spread of ratios in the 'box and if you attack turn 9 with a little too much gusto, you can feel the rear end do a little steering for you. Splits over the timed lap were 17.1, 11.7, 13.5, 19.6 & 21.5. The best sector times I managed were
16.8, 11.6, 13.4, 19.6 & 21.5 so dipping down to a 1:22:9xx isn't dreaming.
Pretty fast there, Petey. Nice lap.
Thanks guys Great cars on a great track = a whole lot of fun.Thanks for the review. Sounds like there is a lot of speed in this tune if a perfect lap was achieved. Glad you enjoyed the ride so much and could push through the quick corners as much as you could. You did an amazing time in my tune too so well done
Thank you for testing and for the review, I'm glad you enjoyed the car Bit of a dark horse Pete, never realised you were of the extraterrestrial varietyHey guys, it's review time
All testing was conducted using the buttons on a DS3 with manual transmission & gear changes made at the redline on the tachometer . I did 5 clean laps as a 'getting to know you session' and that was followed by 10 clean laps that were timed. The results are as follows:
@Motor City Hami
Lap time: 1:22:882 DC: 10.0
Impression of the tune:
It's almost as if this tune is in another world it's so damn fast. My first timed lap was a 1:23:256! It has excellent power down traction out of turn 2, is solid, stable, inspires confidence and invites you to push harder. You can really trust the front end but the rear will let go if you get too brave & try cornering over the limit. Although it's a little short on the gearing, I'm not paying for the engines so send the bills to the guy with the sweaty brow
The timed lap had sector splits of 16.7, 11.5, 13.5, 19.5 & 21.6. The best sector times I managed were 16.6, 11.4, 13.3, 19.4 & 21.5.
@Pete05
Lap time: 1:23:151 DC: 9.0
Impression of the tune:
A lot faster than I thought it would be. As I've said, it's as good as I could make it with the limited tuning experience I have.
The timed lap had sectors splits of 16.8, 11.6, 13.4, 19.7 & 21.6. The only sector I had a better time on was sector 2 at a 11.5.
@DolHaus
Lap time: 1:23:589 DC: 9.4
Impression of the tune:
This one's fast but a bit more on the edge. If you step over that edge it's hard to bring it back. I had to work hard to get a smooth run out of turn 2 and I felt the gear change points to be very similar to my tune.
The timed lap had sector splits of 16.9, 11.6, 13.6, 19.6 & 21.7. The best sector times I managed were
16.9, 11.6, 13.4, 19.5 & 21.5 so it has the potential to go faster if you can pull it all together.
@Otaliema
Lap time: 1:23:665 DC: 9.5
Impression of the tune:
I felt this one was fast considering the downforce levels you have to work with. It's got very good high speed stability, good power down traction out of turns 2 & 4 and I liked the spacing of the gear ratios.
The timed lap had sector splits of
16.9, 11.6, 13.3, 19.7 & 21.8. The best sector times I managed were
16.9, 11.5, 13.3, 19.7 & 21.6 so again, potentially faster times are there for the taking.
@shaunm80
Lap time: 1:23:692 DC: 9.3
Impression of the tune:
Good stability in all corners although it's a little edgy on the brakes into turns 2 & 4 and then you have to work hard for clean power down traction. It's easy flat at turn 5, if you kiss the kerbs at turns 6 & 7 it won't throw you off, has a good spread of ratios in the 'box and if you attack turn 9 with a little too much gusto, you can feel the rear end do a little steering for you. Splits over the timed lap were 17.1, 11.7, 13.5, 19.6 & 21.5. The best sector times I managed were
16.8, 11.6, 13.4, 19.6 & 21.5 so dipping down to a 1:22:9xx isn't dreaming.
@Bowtie-muscle
Lap time: 1:23:846 DC: 9.2
Impression of the tune:
This is a tune with a trustworthy front end & crazy good turn-in but if you stray onto an outside kerb, you're going for a wild ride. It's got very good power down out of turn 2 and is solid everywhere else. As I've mentioned previously, the final two ratios in the gearbox are too long & that has cost it time in a field as closely stacked as this.
Split times over the timed lap were
17.1, 11.7, 13.4, 19.8 & 21.6. The best sector times I managed were 16.9, 11.6, 13.3, 19.6 & 21.6.
@MrGrado
Lap time: 1:24:321 DC: 8.9
Impression of the tune:
I found this tune to be the edgiest of the whole field. It has a front end so endowed with grip the rear can't keep up. When it oversteers it's very hard to catch the slide. I had turn-in oversteer at turns 1, 5 & 9. A little more grip in the rear & it would be almost perfect. Like Motor City Hami's tune, it's got short gearing that had the tachometer in the red into turns 1 & 5. The timed lap had sector times of 17.0, 11.8, 13.6, 20.0 & 21.8. The best sector times I managed were 16.8, 11.6, 13.5, 19.5 & 21.6 so it's potential is much better than I could produce over one lap.
@fordracer
Lap time: 1:24:739 DC: 8.5
Impression of the tune:
This tune has a rear end that's more planted than an old growth forest! Unfortunately the front is too prone to understeer with the front tyres cherry red in the turns. As someone who doesn't play well with a vague front end, this had an effect on my times. It puts it's power down really well at turn 2 but the understeer meant I had to wait at turn 9 before I could get back to the throttle. The same can be said about turn 4 which ultimately affected speed down the long straight towards turn 5. Sector times from the timed lap were 17.1, 11.7, 13.7, 20.0 & 22.1 with my best sectors being 17.0, 11.6, 13.5, 19.9 & 21.9.
@Ridox2JZGTE
Lap time: 1:24:921 DC: 8.8
Impression of the tune:
I can only describe this tune as a case of what could've been. I tried really hard to stitch together a quick lap but when this one gets away from you it's gone forever. The front end is good in slow to medium speed corners but falls into understeer in the high speed stuff. I had to be really patient with the power down out of turn 2 & I feel it's hurt by the low downforce levels meaning it can't carry a high corner speed. The timed lap produced sectors of 17.3, 11.7, 13.6, 20.1 & 22.0. The best sector times I managed were
17.0, 11.6, 13.4, 19.9 & 21.8.
@xande1959
Lap time: 1:24:940 DC: 7.9
Impression of the tune:
This tune, more than any other here, was hurt by the choice of gear ratios. It was hard to decide wether to use 2nd or 3rd at turn 2 and 3rd or 4th at turns 4 & 8. Adding to the woes was the fact 5th gear was too long for this track. On the positive side was it's power down traction out of turn 2, it's consistency, the ability to save a slide and the way it is unaffected by riding the kerbs. The timed lap had sector split times of 17.2, 11.8, 13.5, 19.9 & 22.3. The best sectors I managed were 17.2, 11.7, 13.5, 19.9 & 22.0.
@sinof1337
Lap time: 1:25:427 DC: 8.0
Impression of the tune:
This tune has the lowest combined downforce of all the tunes. If it understeers, it's of the terminal variety & lifting off the power won't rescue the situation. That made it very hard to commit & trust the front end and be consistent. The timed lap had sector split times of 17.4, 11.7, 13.7, 20.2 & 22.2. The best sector times I managed were 17.2, 11.7, 13.4, 19.9 & 22.0.
Hey guys, it's review time
All testing was conducted using the buttons on a DS3 with manual transmission & gear changes made at the redline on the tachometer . I did 5 clean laps as a 'getting to know you session' and that was followed by 10 clean laps that were timed. The results are as follows:
@Motor City Hami
Lap time: 1:22:882 DC: 10.0
Impression of the tune:
It's almost as if this tune is in another world it's so damn fast. My first timed lap was a 1:23:256! It has excellent power down traction out of turn 2, is solid, stable, inspires confidence and invites you to push harder. You can really trust the front end but the rear will let go if you get too brave & try cornering over the limit. Although it's a little short on the gearing, I'm not paying for the engines so send the bills to the guy with the sweaty brow
The timed lap had sector splits of 16.7, 11.5, 13.5, 19.5 & 21.6. The best sector times I managed were 16.6, 11.4, 13.3, 19.4 & 21.5.
Great reviews. :wow: to the times.Impression of the tune:
I felt this one was fast considering the downforce levels you have to work with. It's got very good high speed stability, good power down traction out of turns 2 & 4 and I liked the spacing of the gear ratios.
The timed lap had sector splits of
16.9, 11.6, 13.3, 19.7 & 21.8. The best sector times I managed were
16.9, 11.5, 13.3, 19.7 & 21.6 so again, potentially faster times are there for the taking.
Anyone want to test it?
Thanks for the review, and for hosting this great event. Feedback always appreciated.Hey guys, it's review time
All testing was conducted using the buttons on a DS3 with manual transmission & gear changes made at the redline on the tachometer . I did 5 clean laps as a 'getting to know you session' and that was followed by 10 clean laps that were timed. The results are as follows:
@Motor City Hami
Lap time: 1:22:882 DC: 10.0
Impression of the tune:
It's almost as if this tune is in another world it's so damn fast. My first timed lap was a 1:23:256! It has excellent power down traction out of turn 2, is solid, stable, inspires confidence and invites you to push harder. You can really trust the front end but the rear will let go if you get too brave & try cornering over the limit. Although it's a little short on the gearing, I'm not paying for the engines so send the bills to the guy with the sweaty brow
The timed lap had sector splits of 16.7, 11.5, 13.5, 19.5 & 21.6. The best sector times I managed were 16.6, 11.4, 13.3, 19.4 & 21.5.
@Pete05
Lap time: 1:23:151 DC: 9.0
Impression of the tune:
A lot faster than I thought it would be. As I've said, it's as good as I could make it with the limited tuning experience I have.
The timed lap had sectors splits of 16.8, 11.6, 13.4, 19.7 & 21.6. The only sector I had a better time on was sector 2 at a 11.5.
@DolHaus
Lap time: 1:23:589 DC: 9.4
Impression of the tune:
This one's fast but a bit more on the edge. If you step over that edge it's hard to bring it back. I had to work hard to get a smooth run out of turn 2 and I felt the gear change points to be very similar to my tune.
The timed lap had sector splits of 16.9, 11.6, 13.6, 19.6 & 21.7. The best sector times I managed were
16.9, 11.6, 13.4, 19.5 & 21.5 so it has the potential to go faster if you can pull it all together.
@Otaliema
Lap time: 1:23:665 DC: 9.5
Impression of the tune:
I felt this one was fast considering the downforce levels you have to work with. It's got very good high speed stability, good power down traction out of turns 2 & 4 and I liked the spacing of the gear ratios.
The timed lap had sector splits of
16.9, 11.6, 13.3, 19.7 & 21.8. The best sector times I managed were
16.9, 11.5, 13.3, 19.7 & 21.6 so again, potentially faster times are there for the taking.
@shaunm80
Lap time: 1:23:692 DC: 9.3
Impression of the tune:
Good stability in all corners although it's a little edgy on the brakes into turns 2 & 4 and then you have to work hard for clean power down traction. It's easy flat at turn 5, if you kiss the kerbs at turns 6 & 7 it won't throw you off, has a good spread of ratios in the 'box and if you attack turn 9 with a little too much gusto, you can feel the rear end do a little steering for you. Splits over the timed lap were 17.1, 11.7, 13.5, 19.6 & 21.5. The best sector times I managed were
16.8, 11.6, 13.4, 19.6 & 21.5 so dipping down to a 1:22:9xx isn't dreaming.
@Bowtie-muscle
Lap time: 1:23:846 DC: 9.2
Impression of the tune:
This is a tune with a trustworthy front end & crazy good turn-in but if you stray onto an outside kerb, you're going for a wild ride. It's got very good power down out of turn 2 and is solid everywhere else. As I've mentioned previously, the final two ratios in the gearbox are too long & that has cost it time in a field as closely stacked as this.
Split times over the timed lap were
17.1, 11.7, 13.4, 19.8 & 21.6. The best sector times I managed were 16.9, 11.6, 13.3, 19.6 & 21.6.
@MrGrado
Lap time: 1:24:321 DC: 8.9
Impression of the tune:
I found this tune to be the edgiest of the whole field. It has a front end so endowed with grip the rear can't keep up. When it oversteers it's very hard to catch the slide. I had turn-in oversteer at turns 1, 5 & 9. A little more grip in the rear & it would be almost perfect. Like Motor City Hami's tune, it's got short gearing that had the tachometer in the red into turns 1 & 5. The timed lap had sector times of 17.0, 11.8, 13.6, 20.0 & 21.8. The best sector times I managed were 16.8, 11.6, 13.5, 19.5 & 21.6 so it's potential is much better than I could produce over one lap.
@fordracer
Lap time: 1:24:739 DC: 8.5
Impression of the tune:
This tune has a rear end that's more planted than an old growth forest! Unfortunately the front is too prone to understeer with the front tyres cherry red in the turns. As someone who doesn't play well with a vague front end, this had an effect on my times. It puts it's power down really well at turn 2 but the understeer meant I had to wait at turn 9 before I could get back to the throttle. The same can be said about turn 4 which ultimately affected speed down the long straight towards turn 5. Sector times from the timed lap were 17.1, 11.7, 13.7, 20.0 & 22.1 with my best sectors being 17.0, 11.6, 13.5, 19.9 & 21.9.
@Ridox2JZGTE
Lap time: 1:24:921 DC: 8.8
Impression of the tune:
I can only describe this tune as a case of what could've been. I tried really hard to stitch together a quick lap but when this one gets away from you it's gone forever. The front end is good in slow to medium speed corners but falls into understeer in the high speed stuff. I had to be really patient with the power down out of turn 2 & I feel it's hurt by the low downforce levels meaning it can't carry a high corner speed. The timed lap produced sectors of 17.3, 11.7, 13.6, 20.1 & 22.0. The best sector times I managed were
17.0, 11.6, 13.4, 19.9 & 21.8.
@xande1959
Lap time: 1:24:940 DC: 7.9
Impression of the tune:
This tune, more than any other here, was hurt by the choice of gear ratios. It was hard to decide wether to use 2nd or 3rd at turn 2 and 3rd or 4th at turns 4 & 8. Adding to the woes was the fact 5th gear was too long for this track. On the positive side was it's power down traction out of turn 2, it's consistency, the ability to save a slide and the way it is unaffected by riding the kerbs. The timed lap had sector split times of 17.2, 11.8, 13.5, 19.9 & 22.3. The best sectors I managed were 17.2, 11.7, 13.5, 19.9 & 22.0.
@sinof1337
Lap time: 1:25:427 DC: 8.0
Impression of the tune:
This tune has the lowest combined downforce of all the tunes. If it understeers, it's of the terminal variety & lifting off the power won't rescue the situation. That made it very hard to commit & trust the front end and be consistent. The timed lap had sector split times of 17.4, 11.7, 13.7, 20.2 & 22.2. The best sector times I managed were 17.2, 11.7, 13.4, 19.9 & 22.0.
Exactly.I should also work up an averaged transmission, but the only way to do it would be to convert each gearbox to individual gear times the final drive, then reverse engineer it in the game.
Sounds like a challenge. I accept.I should also work up an averaged transmission, but the only way to do it would be to convert each gearbox to individual gear times the final drive, then reverse engineer it in the game.
Slowly copy pasting with tablet..Sounds like a challenge. I accept.
My numbers vary slightly.Slowly copy pasting with tablet..
1.358641378
0.91910881
0.703410516
0.558162386
0.460422376
2.83
First five.. Now reversing..
3.8449551
2.601077932
1.990651761
1.579599551
1.302995324
Final 2.83
Bout rounding, nothing else.My numbers vary slightly.
Average Gear box
Initial Final Gear 3.504
Top Speed 127.8(127 mph)
1st 3.845
2nd 2.601
3rd 1.991
4th 1.580
5th 1.303
Final 2.830
Google Sheet
good point. I must be hungry I didn't read your numbers right.Bout rounding, nothing else.
@xande1959 – lap time 125.861 – DC 8
Good turn in. Needs more front grip on exit when pushed to the limit. The gearbox cost a bunch of time as 5th gear is barely used.
@xande1959
Lap time: 1:24:940 DC: 7.9
Impression of the tune:
This tune, more than any other here, was hurt by the choice of gear ratios. It was hard to decide wether to use 2nd or 3rd at turn 2 and 3rd or 4th at turns 4 & 8. Adding to the woes was the fact 5th gear was too long for this track. On the positive side was it's power down traction out of turn 2, it's consistency, the ability to save a slide and the way it is unaffected by riding the kerbs. The timed lap had sector split times of 17.2, 11.8, 13.5, 19.9 & 22.3. The best sectors I managed were 17.2, 11.7, 13.5, 19.9 & 22.0.
Normally it works fairly well. @shaunm80 and I use it when building our combo cars. He builds one way I build another we combine them via average and then make final tweaks but a lot of times the average numbers are pretty close to the final product if not final for most items.Maybe if you took the suspension from one, diff from another, different trans etc. you might be able to build a good car but averages isn't going to provide the solution.
Too many sources and a stock car throwing off things like the alignment, if you took the cars that did the best individual sectors and then averaged it then it could perhaps work.Normally it works fairly well. @shaunm80 and I use it when building our combo cars. He builds one way I build another we combine them via average and then make final tweaks but a lot of times the average numbers are pretty close to the final product if not final for most items.
I think you would still have @Pete05 car in the mix even with that.Too many sources and a stock car throwing off things like the alignment, if you took the cars that did the best individual sectors and then averaged it then it could perhaps work.
I see all sorts of conflicting settings that are causing the issues, the settings are sliders to a degree but they are all connected and need to be manipulated together in order to compliment each other. A problem at the back of the car is partially caused by a problem with the front of the car, a problem with turn in can be caused by a problem with the diff that is as a result of a problem with the transmission* and so on, everything is connected. Its like throwing all your favourite foods in a blender and expecting the outcome to be betterI think you would still have @Pete05 car in the mix even with that.
Based on what @coryclifford said the back is too stiff, drop the rear compression damper by 2 and that would prolly solve the issue.
I don't think that would work too well...Makes me want to blend a steak, chicken and shrimp with a bunch of beer for a nice drink.
Not a problem Now, take me to your leaderThank you for testing and for the review, I'm glad you enjoyed the car Bit of a dark horse Pete, never realised you were of the extraterrestrial variety
Yes, X and square & my thumbs hate me for it Thanks for the offer of online racing & teaming up. I'd chew my toes off for the chance but my PS3 isn't onlineYou did that time with a DS3 using x and square? I was going to ask you to do some online racing after this competition was over. Maybe second thinking that decision.
Hey, if we do another race series where we pair up, I call @Pete05 as teammate!
And thanks for the test drive and awesome time.
I've got some very compromising pics of the local tyre dealer so tyre wear isn't an issue It's been an eye-opener & I couldn't have done it without you sharing your wisdom & experience. You're work on the google sheets & walking me through posting correctly has been invaluableGreat reviews. :wow: to the times.
1:22 do you have tires left?
Thank you for all the work you have put into this event. You're doing a great job your first time out 👍
It's been a pleasure & really well supported by you all 👍Thanks for the review, and for hosting this great event. Feedback always appreciated.
When you get the chance, try your settings with my gear ratios. I'm sure you'll go faster 👍as I told (HAMI) without current time, but transmission left to be desired. Thank you so much
Must be handyI've got some very compromising pics of the local tyre dealer so tyre wear isn't an issue It's been an eye-opener & I couldn't have done it without you sharing your wisdom & experience. You're work on the google sheets & walking me through posting correctly has been invaluable
A-1Do I use A-1 or cocktail sauce?
I laughed.