- 940
- United Kingdom
Whatever
Last edited:
Stellar response.Whatever!
Having said that, since the Monte Carlo only entered one race, that would make it the MasterCard Lola of International Formula 3000.The Monte Carlo 001-Cosworth
Or the Life L190 of International Formula 3000. In the hands of Fulvio Ballabio, the car's sole outing at Imola in the 1986 F3000 Season saw it not only fail to qualify but it was also bog last of the 36 entrants. Its fastest time? 3 minutes, 4.8 seconds! 1 minute, 25 seconds off the pace of the March of pole-sitter (and eventual Champion) Ivan Capelli, 1 minute, 11.5 seconds off the pace of the Dollop Racing Marches (i.e. a team that only made the F3000 grid once in two years of trying, and on this occasion, were slower than everyone else). The car is said to have suffered from gearbox problems but still, similar things could be said about the Life at the same circuit four years later! Not surprisingly, Ballabio and the Monte Carlo made no further appearances, though it has been said that the team's transporter crashed down a ravine and caught fire on the journey home from Imola, thus ruling out further appearances anyway.
Though having said all of the above, the car's performance (or lack thereof) can be explained by the stories behind it. For one, some stories claim it was originally intended to race in the 1985 F3000 Season so it was already a year old before its appearance at Imola. Also, the car had its origins in the unraced Dywa 010 F1 car, which was originally designed in 1983 (although some stories suggest it was 1980), which in turn, was the successor to the Dywa 008 that pulled out of the only race it ever entered after qualifying (The 1980 Gran Premio Della Lotteria at Monza) after Piercarlo Ghinzani's fastest time was 36.5 seconds off the pace of Emilio de Villota's RAM Racing Williams and nearly 21.5 seconds off the pace of a trio of Formula 2 Chevrons that were the next slowest qualifiers!
All in all, that's what you get for basing your car on a chassis that was already several years out of date but was also based on a car that was described as "a relic from an O-level metalwork class" and put together by a team that "lacked professionalism", according to their driver. After all, this is the same Piercarlo Ghinzani who felt it was better to be in F1 at the tail-end than not in F1 at all! To me, that's even worse than the "interesting flowerpot" that the FIRST F189 was described as before it was reborn as the Life L190!
Does Michael Andretti also fit? Sure, he has Indycar Championships, but his career at Indy and outside of IndyCar was largely a failed one.If we're going off that metric, you might as well throw Richard Childress and Zak Brown in there while you are at it. Pretty sure there are many others.
Definately wouldn't count Micheal either considering he's brought home major championships so far from a failure. At best, cursed at Indy (Like alot of drivers honestly).Does Michael Andretti also fit? Sure, he has Indycar Championships, but his career at Indy and outside of IndyCar was largely a failed one.
Christian Horner as a racing driver.
Christian Horner: how a failed racing career created a legendary Team Principal
FormulaNerds.com — Features — It will shock some, but Christian Horner originally intended to compete in F1 as a driver. He failed.www.formulanerds.com
I am prone to misinterpretation and misunderstanding as well as difficulties with articulation, explaining things, stringing sentences together and finding the right words as these are all part and parcel of my having a learning disability as I am on the Autism Spectrum. These difficulties are particularly prominent when I am excited or frustrated or both as was the case with watching Mikey Doble blow his first BTCC pole position before the race even started as mentioned earlier in the thread.What about Yamaha as an F1 engine supplier? Especially 1989 with Zakspeed, 2 DNFs, 30 DNPQs, one destroyed single seater career of a future DTM legend, one lost sponsor that doesn't reappear until 1997 thus precipitating in the team's demise despite briefly appearing in pre-season testing for 1990 and Yamaha taking a year out.
Anyone seen this article on the Osella FA1L from the 1988 F1 Season?
Strictly speaking, it should have been called the FA1J as their 1987 car was the FA1I.Well, that name was all a plan... FA1L/FAIL... Come on, they couldn't have thought of it!
Copy the URL of the post you want to embed. Then click the Media icon on a post and paste the address into the box.Side note - how on earth did you embed that post?
What a way to blow your first Pole Position
Team HARD lives but significantly (and sensibly) downsized.Does Team HARD in the BTCC count now that they've folded? Only 1 Win (In the wet and in a reverse-grid race) in over a decade of trying, at least this makes them not as bad as Peugeot in the Supertouring era in this respect, but not much better either.
I'm not sure, would it count for this though?Does USF1 count
Just wonderedI'm not sure, would it count for this though?
Commissioning Motori Moderni to build the engine in the first place was a bad move on Subaru's part. The turbo engines produced for Minardi from 1985 to 1987 (and briefly AGS in 1986) should have been proof enough of that. The engine never produced more than 800 horsepower (making it one of the least powerful engines on the grid) and reliability was so poor that Minardi racked up just 9 classified finishes (the best being a pair of 8th places) in three seasons (and none at all for AGS but then they only used the engine for 2 races as a toe-in-the-water exercise, and because all teams were required to run turbo engines in 1986, before entering full-time in 1987). The engine often struggled to beat the less-powerful normally aspirated Cosworth-powered cars (which produced less than 600 horsepower). The stillborn Ekstrom F1 team that tried to enter F1 in 1986 also intended to use Motori Moderni engines, specifically the 1985-spec version, so they kind of dodged a bullet there as a result of their entry failing to materialise. Even Zakspeed's own turbo engines were more powerful than the Motori Moderni.The "Subaru" 1235 flat-12
View attachment 496942
Entirely designed and built by Motori Moderni in 1990, this new flat-12 engine had the advantage of a low centre of gravity, as is the case with most Boxer engines. Sadly, it was also grossly overweight, underpowered and delicate. Nevertheless, Subaru were more than happy to plaster their name on it, as it would prove good business and show the advantages of their road cars which used horizontally opposed engine configurations as well. They were so confident in its abilities, they bought a sizeable chunk of the Coloni team and set about stuffing the engines in their cars. The C3B, which used the engine failed to make pre-qualifying once on practically every appearance. By the 8th attempt, Subaru decided it was a complete sham, and sold its share in Coloni back to their original owners.
The engine also saw use in the Alba AR20 Group C race car, which was also plagued with issues, and only qualified for one race at Spa, yet never made the start due to engine failure shortly after. The team replaced it with a 4.5 litre Buick V6 and started seeing some more positive results. A road legal variant of the engine was tweaked for use in the Jiotto Caspita supercar concept, but Subaru's abandonment meant it could never feasibly make it to production.
It's awful, but still kind of interesting.