Fair Critique of GT7?

  • Thread starter dabz343
  • 74 comments
  • 5,345 views
To save everyone time
Screenshot_20240201-123624_YouTube.jpg
Screenshot_20240201-123629_YouTube.jpg
 
If what I post isn't for you, then why not just move on quietly?
all you did was post a video with zero comment on what it was about... how are you supposed to determine who the post is for then?
Why would I engage with this topic of the thread and/or watch the video if all you've done is posted the link to it...
So Yes a quality post from you
 
Last edited:
all you did was post a video with zero comment on what it was about... how are you supposed to determine who the post is for then?
So Yes a quality post from you
Zero comment?

Did I not ask if you thought this was a fair critique of GT7 in the title?
 
Fair Critique of GT7?
I would say yes, but that's because I agree with most of the points :D
What I don't like is comparing the added cars of gt7 vs the paid dlc cars in iRacing. The added cars in iracing have a "context" (eg lmp3 ligier and the different gt3 cars for "imsa style" endurance races or old nascar cars for certain oval racing series), in gt7 it seems more randomly ._.
 
Zero comment?

Did I not ask if you thought this was a fair critique of GT7 in the title?
I wont watch a video for something that could be done in around 10 written words.
Less time spend, more efficiency, better.

My opinion of the game is, that it still has lots of issues, but as someone sticking around only in the singleplayer part for the most time, I dont feel the impact of the majority of them.
But other things are still "wth is this not yet fixed or changed"?
Though the game makes fun, so it definitly is worth its money.

Would this require 15 minutes of blahblah?
 
Zero comment?

Did I not ask if you thought this was a fair critique of GT7 in the title?
That's the title of the thread, how's that going giving your comment on it? how is that getting engagment and discussion going? I'll tell you what it makes people less likely to watch,
So when you want to start a thread with no direction and then tell someone to move on, what are you actually looking for? surely you're smarter than this. be better
 
Funny, when I called out someone posting a video with a clickbait thumbnail I was the bad guy, nice to see double standards apply here
 
Funny, when I called out someone posting a video with a clickbait thumbnail I was the bad guy, nice to see double standards apply here
do you see a lot of posters above approving the initial post of the thread ?
 
My point is that when I called someone out everyone accused me of stuff. Suddenly, in this thread, it's fine.
Yeah but Tidgney didn't just post someone else's random video, he posted a video of his own with the comment "I've created a Preview video for those interested" hardly the same thing mate
 
Last edited:
I

If you say so, I call double standards.
If you are desperatly looking for someone agreeing to you, you should make some good point about basically anything on topic.
Your current search for EGO+ definitly isnt helping the thread at all, and it is quite ridiculous continuing.
 
If you are desperatly looking for someone agreeing to you, you should make some good point about basically anything on topic.
Your current search for EGO+ definitly isnt helping the thread at all, and it is quite ridiculous continuing.
Nah, not seeking anything, just pointing out double standards. Have a nice day 🙂
 
I could, but me moving on quietly won't change your "hey I got this idea, better make a thread of it" habit.
Stop trying to change people by telllig them what they should post, it's not a good look.
 
Nice try pops, I ain't involved, don't start trying to make anything in this specific post about me.
nice try? I've just shown you a literal definition of what double standards is, I guess English isn't your first language or strong suit then...
 

Latest Posts

Back