On the F40 the middle pipe was used for the turbo. As the F458 dosn't have a turbo it's a bit 'gimmicky'
Slightly off topic, but why do Ferrari continually jump about with their naming conventions?
308 - 3 litre 8 cylinder
328 - 3.2 litre 8 cylinder
348 - Yep, you guessed it
355 - Errr, what? 3.5 litre 5 cylinder?
360 - 3.6 litre. 0 what?
430 - 4.3 litre. Still 0 somethings.
458 - 4.5 litre 8 cyclinder? Yes? Woohoo.
On topic. I like the look of it. 👍
This should explain it a little bit daan.Slightly off topic, but why do Ferrari continually jump about with their naming conventions?
308 - 3 litre 8 cylinder
328 - 3.2 litre 8 cylinder
348 - Yep, you guessed it
355 - Errr, what? 3.5 litre 5 cylinder?
360 - 3.6 litre. 0 what?
430 - 4.3 litre. Still 0 somethings.
458 - 4.5 litre 8 cyclinder? Yes? Woohoo.
On topic. I like the look of it. 👍
It's like Ferrari's take on the Lotus Evora.
Yeah, I do know all that.This should explain it a little bit daan.
http://www.caroverload.com/blog/2009/07/12/ferrari-naming-conventions-the-numbers/
It's pretty meh, design wise. Where's the gills, vents and all the rest of supercar madness? It's too sedate for a Ferrari.
Wow, that's a stunning car. It'll take a little while to see one moving to understand what's going on with the graphics in the front, but that is a gorgeous car. I love the way the bonnet folds over the lights and similarly in the back, where its sensual lines break over the rear glass. It's very reminiscent of a beautiful woman in a designer dress.
This blows the 430 out of the water, which to me was a poorly facelifted 360. Finally, we're back to coherent, attractive and lustful Ferraris. There was a good 3 models that totally missed the mark, but the ball is definitely back in their court. Lamborghini, step the hell up!
If you're classing the 360 in models that missed the mark I'd have to disagree with you though! In my view the 360 was the last genuinely pretty Ferrari.
IMO it's the least sedate Ferrari since the Enzo, which in turn was the least sedate Ferrari since the F40. How un-sedate do you want them?
Agree with all of this but especially the bit in bold 👍 If you're classing the 360 in models that missed the mark I'd have to disagree with you though! In my view the 360 was the last genuinely pretty Ferrari.
Regarding the sound in the video further up, I have to say that it's the one aspect so far I'm a little disappointed with if that's genuinely what it sounds like - the gearchange sounds odd (very quick by the sounds of things - do we know if it's twin clutch? - but odd), and the sound is a bit sedate compared to something like the old 360CS:
I like the 430 better.
homeforsummerthe gearchange sounds odd (very quick by the sounds of things - do we know if it's twin clutch?]
The dual-clutch unit from the California has been modified with different ratios and now shifts even faster than the 430 Scuderia’s 0.06sec. The gearbox’s shift style is likely to be slightly more aggressive than the California’s.