- 2,577
- East Sussex
- P1K3Y_M1K3Y
Test the success HP penalty system?Could you guys test 2 of the other cars minus 10 or 20 hp to see how they perform ?
It could be argued that some cars might perform better than others with the penalties.
Test the success HP penalty system?Could you guys test 2 of the other cars minus 10 or 20 hp to see how they perform ?
It could be argued that some cars might perform better than others with the penalties.
Test the success HP penalty system?
OK we will get that done before we release the final report 👍Yes , for example test the rx7 at maximum penalty with your specs and test it with the specs before and the same with any other 2 cars
8.4.2.1. Track limits.Question about track boundaries. Is it two on the tarmac or two on the rumbles or 4 on the tarmac/rumbles?
Is there a maximum penalty? Or you just meant the maximum per one race? @SkengD
So at the entrance to ascari at monza can you cut the green concrete as long as your right side wheels stay on track or do your left side wheels have to stay on track?8.4.2.1. Track limits.
Track limits are always defined by the white if you can not see a white line then 2 wheels should always stay in contact with the racing surface. This does not include the red and white kerbs, only the tarmac.
May i ask . apart from speed , is the tyre wear being taken into any consideration with this ? as its endurance a car that is fast but with tyres that last only 5 laps has no advantage - likewise a car that is fast that handles so badly a crash is impossible to avoid having over the time endurance race - just wondered if these things will be calculated ?FGTA CAR TESTINGAs the car testing is dragging out a little (I'm sure you appreciate we are busy and do have lives away from Gran Turismo, so is taking a little while) we are going to release this provisional report on the cars now, so you all know what will be happening on Monday, and once all the testing data is complete, we will release a final report after Monday's race.
PROVISIONAL REPORT
You can view all our testing times and data so far here
Plase note, all lap times are entered in second's format to allow the spreadsheet to calculate the averages for each car on each track, and then also over every track (bottom table)
so:
A lap time of 1.00.000 would read as 60.000, 1.30.000 = 90.000 etc.
As you can see the RX7 is faster at every track with the smallest split time to the next car being .4 and on average is .3 faster over all the tracks.
You will also see we have tested it after dropping 10bhp (to 285bhp) and it is still in no way uncompetetive and will result in closer racing.
On this basis we are advising a 10bhp reduction to the RX7 ahead of Monday's race.
As you might have noticed the Subaru Impreza isn't too far off the RX7 (before power reduction) so we are doing a little more testing on that and will release our recommendation on that in our final report.
It would be good if all drivers could PM me after Monday's race with their thoughts on how the cars performed against each other.
I don't want to get into it again. It's above my head now.Why you changed your post , lol .
I saw it anyway
May i ask . apart from speed , is the tyre wear being taken into any consideration with this ? as its endurance a car that is fast but with tyres that last only 5 laps has no advantage - likewise a car that is fast that handles so badly a crash is impossible to avoid having over the time endurance race - just wondered if these things will be calculated ?
Yes. Both of us race in the STCC series (see @Scaniabebe for more). Harsk races with Humberside Racing along with Scania, whilst I race for Audi-Muttonfudge Racing as an independent team.Are you related to harsk?
Yes. Both of us race in the STCC series (see @Scaniabebe for more). Harsk races with Humberside Racing along with Scania, whilst I race for Audi-Muttonfudge Racing as an independent team.
Yes. Both of us race in the STCC series (see @Scaniabebe for more). Harsk races with Humberside Racing along with Scania, whilst I race for Audi-Muttonfudge Racing as an independent team.
I don't want to get into it again. It's above my head now.
Oh. Why would you NOT hire Harsk when you'e not on drugs?Excuse me? Harsk does not race for Humberside Racing... @SkengD does though!
I think people would have been wondering what drugs I'd been taking to have Harsk in the team
Oh. Why would you NOT hire Harsk when you'e not on drugs?
53? no, really? 53?1:53.6 is my fastest with any of the cars at current specs
53? no, really? 53?
Yes it was considered, RX7 seemed no worse (over all 4 drivers) than any of the others for tyre and fuel life and is the only thing that has stopped us pulling the Impreza back too as that does seem to really suffer with its tyres.May i ask . apart from speed , is the tyre wear being taken into any consideration with this ? as its endurance a car that is fast but with tyres that last only 5 laps has no advantage - likewise a car that is fast that handles so badly a crash is impossible to avoid having over the time endurance race - just wondered if these things will be calculated ?
I would assume that they do, since they still have the points from the finishes. Also I raced skeng last night and his minus 30hp was faster than my minus 20hp.Question about the 10hp off the rx7's. Do the current drivers with penalties now have to take another 10 off?
I would assume that they do, since they still have the points from the finishes. Also I raced skeng last night and his minus 30hp was faster than my minus 20hp.
I said 15hp, they said 10hp. They averaged a couple of drivers lap times so I'm assuming that's the difference.You recommended 20 less hp right ?
FGTA recommended 10 less hp
I am still waiting to see the FGTA's final test data then I will give my comments.
Thats the RX-753? no, really? 53?